Results 1 to 15 of 15

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: GT Advanced Basically Blaming Apple for Bankruptcy

  1. #1
    What's Jailbreak? Michael Essany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana
    Posts
    4,376
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 1,491 Times in 577 Posts

    Default GT Advanced Basically Blaming Apple for Bankruptcy


    On Monday, Apple's sapphire partner GT Advanced Technologies announced it has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

    GT indicated in a news release that it is taking proactive steps to stop the bleeding, but only as the week progressed have we gained more insight as to what those steps would entail.

    While the company said it regrets the potential lost jobs, winding the facility down by the end of the year will help “stop its mounting losses.” The company said it would seek to close the plant during a court hearing Thursday.
    So what's behind the company's seemingly abrupt financial turn for the worse? According to GT, Apple is pretty much the catalyst for this economic calamity.

    “The cash burn at GTAT’s sapphire manufacturing operations for the benefit of Apple is not sustainable,” attorneys for GT Advanced are quoted today by the Wall Street Journal.

    Ouch.

    The WSJ says, "in seeking to reject the agreements with Apple, GT Advanced said it wants permission to assert further claims against Apple in the future." In filings with U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Hampshire, GT argued that "it has many claims against Apple arising out of its business relationship with Apple.”

    Not mincing words, GT Advanced called its sapphire-production related agreements with Apple “oppressive and burdensome.”

    Source: WSJ
    GT Advanced to Close Arizona, Massachusetts Sapphire Plants - WSJ

  2. #2
    It's a shame that Apple is so big, they can crush small companies with a bat of an eye. These companies ramp up infrastructure, lock in materials contracts, and hire employees in anticipation of Apple's business. Then Apple change their minds. Now the company is stuck with all the overhead and expenses. If Apple had a contract with them, shame on Apple. If GTAT ramped up production without a contract, they gambled and lost.

  3. #3
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Jaw'Ja
    Posts
    596
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 88 Times in 67 Posts

    Sounds like they made agreements with Apple based on expectations they then couldn't fullfill and are now seeking to blame deep pockets to get them ou

  4. #4
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Posts
    88
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 45 Times in 25 Posts

    Sometimes as a company you have to realize that some contracts are too big for you to fulfill.

    I was a Marketing Director at a IT sales company that had annual revenues of around $20M. One of the sales representatives had an "in" with a regional government that had an annual IT spend of... we'll just say more than that. In the $100M range.

    When the sales rep came to me, I told him we didn't want the business. Why? Because our company didn't have the cash flow to float the amount of credit that would be required to fulfill even a fraction of their spending, and because the customer had a local reputation of not paying for 90-180 days after they'd been invoiced, making the cash flow situation that much worse.

    It sounds great as a small company to think you can pull in a whale of an account like Apple - but if you don't have the business infrastructure and operational efficiency in place to manage the account, that while will swallow you whole and pull you under. Sometimes discretion is the better part of valor.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to PCYoda For This Useful Post:

    peacedog (2014-10-13)

  6. #5
    I would expect an announcement of further delays to Apple Watch to follow...

  7. #6
    Or if GTAT had to reach certain target goals, but failed, they also gambled and lost. Either way, it's sad. I was hoping the "S" in next year's 6S and 6S Plus would stand for sapphire. There's no way that's happening now, because nobody else out there has the production capacity. So everyone's going to be stuck with these curved glass screens where no screen protector can properly cover the whole surface :-(

    I mean really, is there ONE screen protector out there right now that truly offers edge-to-edge coverage? (No need to reply, it's a rhetorical question. No, really. Even iloome's new product misses the mark.)

  8. #7
    Livin the iPhone Life bigboyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    North East Coast
    Posts
    2,095
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 430 Times in 265 Posts

    Looks like the fish was too big for the boat. Rock the boat?? :]

  9. #8
    I wouldnt even release a statement and just let things go through court.
    GT was too dumb to realize that it couldnt produce millions and millions pieces of sapphire.

  10. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by edwilk55 View Post
    Sounds like they made agreements with Apple based on expectations they then couldn't fullfill and are now seeking to blame deep pockets to get them ou
    My thoughts exactly.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Raptor2213 For This Useful Post:

    SpiderManAPV (2014-10-10)

  12. #10
    Last time I checked it takes two to tango or sign a legal binding agreement. Can't hack it? Then don't sign. Otherwise learn how to run a company and stop whining about it.

    I think that's a very one sided take on this.
    Last edited by exNavy; 2014-10-11 at 03:21 AM.
    Hmm...

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to exNavy For This Useful Post:

    SpiderManAPV (2014-10-11)

  14. #11
    iPhone? More like MyPhone MPS3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Canada GTA
    Posts
    199
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts

    apple is known for pulling crap like this all the time
    cus they are so big they can always get away with this
    walmart is not any better

  15. #12
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Olympia, WA. USA
    Posts
    93
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by MPS3 View Post
    apple is known for pulling crap like this all the time
    cus they are so big they can always get away with this
    walmart is not any better
    Been doing my research on this for quite some time. Almost invested heavily in GT awhile ago until I discovered that they could not provide what they had said they could provide, bit off more then they could chew you might say. Apple fulfilled all of their obligations to GT even paying most of the investment up front to GT.
    GT screwed up, plain and simple. So I can't really understand how you can say Apple pulls this crap all the time.

  16. #13
    Livin the iPhone Life Carvensno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Butte, MT
    Posts
    2,199
    Thanks
    2,734
    Thanked 1,820 Times in 798 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by csglinux View Post
    Or if GTAT had to reach certain target goals, but failed, they also gambled and lost. Either way, it's sad. I was hoping the "S" in next year's 6S and 6S Plus would stand for sapphire. There's no way that's happening now, because nobody else out there has the production capacity. So everyone's going to be stuck with these curved glass screens where no screen protector can properly cover the whole surface :-(

    I mean really, is there ONE screen protector out there right now that truly offers edge-to-edge coverage? (No need to reply, it's a rhetorical question. No, really. Even iloome's new product misses the mark.)
    Correct if i'm wrong, but I believe Apple is doing business with 2-3 other Sapphire companies are they not? GT was just one of them.

  17. #14
    Is it confirmed that it was indeed GT's fault for not meeting a required number, or did Apple simply didn't want to spend the extra money thinking it wouldn't matter because a screen glass is not going to be a major deciding factor for consumers?

    If it was the later and if Apple said to GT "Go ahead with the preparations. We'll be back on xx date to sign the contract," then it would of totally been Apple's fault. Though it would be tough to prove in court...

  18. #15
    Sounds like GT couldn't keep their end of the contract. modmyi had an earlier article: GT Advanced Technologies Reportedly Looking to "Wind Down" Arizona Plant Operations

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •