+ Reply
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Candy Crush Developer Withdraws Trademark Filing for the word "Candy"

is a discussion within the

Mac News

forums, a part of the

General Apple/Mac

section;
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Akshay Masand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,783
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 118 Times in 104 Posts

    Default Candy Crush Developer Withdraws Trademark Filing for the word "Candy"


    The company behind the popular iOS game Candy Crush, King, has abandoned its controversial pursuit of ownership of the term “candy” in the US and has officially withdrawn its trademark application. The pulling of the application was first revealed by the folks over at Kotaku, which also received an official statement from King. The developer confirmed that the trademark filing was withdrawn after it obtained the rights to the name “Candy Crusher.” The company said the following regarding the matter:

    Each market that King operates in is different with regard to IP. We feel that having the rights to Candy Crusher is the best option for protecting Candy Crush in the U.S. market. This does not affect our E.U. trademark for Candy and we continue to take all appropriate steps to protect our IP.
    The popularity of Candy Crush and the perceived generic theme of King’s pursuit of the trademark for the word “candy” gained considerable attention earlier this year, with some expressing concern. King’s filing sought ownership of the word “candy” as it would relate to digital puzzle games and not necessarily other titles, such as the board game “Candy Land.” Following its purchase of the trademark for the word “candy” in Europe, King began sending cease-and-desist letters to smartphone game developers with apps using the word “candy,” as well as the word “saga,” which the company also owns the rights to. Among the games that received a letter was the developer of the game, Banner Saga, a popular viking-themed role playing game.

    In protest, independent game developers held a “game jam” creating candy-related games to bring attention to their concerns over King’s efforts. The so-called “candy jam” was held with the belief that “trademarking common words is ridiculous.” The theme of the event probably contributed some weight to King’s decision to withdraw the trademark filing which the company has withdrawn.

    Source: Kotaku

    Twitter: @AkshayMasand

  2. #2
    iPhone? More like MyPhone ThatOneProfile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    282
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts

    I'm going to patent that word now. Thanks for the heads up.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ThatOneProfile For This Useful Post:

    lilrican21 (02-25-2014), mmaboi21 (02-25-2014)

  4. #3
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    294
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

    I patent the English words
    "Hello" and "Goodbye"

  5. #4
    Theme Creator Jahooba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,914
    Thanks
    1,425
    Thanked 1,696 Times in 839 Posts

    Oh, thank goodness. What a bunch of jerks - It's so easy to make up words. Juhsparkle. There, a name for a new game. Bangoline. Churple. Those took less than ten seconds - there's no good excuse for taking 'candy' or 'crush'.

  6. #5
    *T*
    *T* is offline
    Grumpy *T*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Turn around slowly...
    Posts
    670
    Thanks
    122
    Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts

    Kluse, Zblam, Trocxr, Splith, Baflok, Shonqs, Viddix. 7 world class names for apps.

  7. #6
    Livin the iPhone Life exNavy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,042
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 169 Times in 124 Posts

    I don't know who started this but can the owners of Bejeweled sue candy crush for just using different icons in their game?

  8. #7
    Green Apple saleen_GT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    95
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by exNavy View Post
    I don't know who started this but can the owners of Bejeweled sue candy crush for just using different icons in their game?
    U 100000000000% rite

    U r 100000000000% rite

  9. #8
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    316
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 32 Times in 21 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by exNavy View Post
    I don't know who started this but can the owners of Bejeweled sue candy crush for just using different icons in their game?
    That would be a patent based suit, not a trademark based suit, but I don't think so, because I believe Candy Crush makes enough changes in the game that it would be difficult to consider it a clone, but it could be considered a derivative work and depending on how long ago Bejweled was patented (if ever), this may be allowed under the law. Remember the whole point of patents is to provide a reasonable time that others can't profit from your work, so that you can recoup the investment you made and make a little profit. After that, the patents allow others to make derivative works based on your patents, this is done to encourage innovation to continue. At least this was the original premise of patents and what we should be aiming to continue doing.

    Trademarks register titles, words, etc. that might confuse people if another similar product started using them.

    Patents cover the actual inventions themselves.

  10. #9
    iPhoneaholic patoons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    351
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts

    people have a problem with them trademarking the word candy meanwhile the devices we all love and use is from a company that trademarked the word apple...

  11. #10
    iPhone? More like MyPhone WithinTemptationFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    "Anywhere But Home"...
    Posts
    169
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 36 Times in 20 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by patoons View Post
    people have a problem with them trademarking the word candy meanwhile the devices we all love and use is from a company that trademarked the word apple...
    lol

  12. #11
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    220
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts

    I am going to patent the word "patent".

    I am going to make millions!!!!

  13. #12
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 42 Times in 31 Posts

    I'm going to trademark "sue," "court," and "legal."

  14. #13
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    That was a bad move from the developers of Candy Crush. Patenting words like these that are very commonly used will only bring resentment among the people. I am not against patenting, but trade name registrations and patenting should be done for unique names of the business not for words like Candy, Teddy etc.

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts