+ Reply
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: US Judge Dismisses Apple Consumer Lawsuit Over Mobile Data Privacy

is a discussion within the

Mac News

forums, a part of the

General Apple/Mac

section;
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Akshay Masand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,781
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 118 Times in 104 Posts

    Default US Judge Dismisses Apple Consumer Lawsuit Over Mobile Data Privacy


    A US District Court Judge recently dismissed a consumer protection lawsuit leveled against Apple that claimed the company inadvertently allowed ad networks to track iOS devices, thus breaching their privacy. Judge Lucy Koh handed down her final ruling in a case involving two California consumer protection laws, saying the four plaintiffs failed to prove they were harmed by any misinterpretation of data privacy on the part of Apple. The following was mentioned in Koh’s ruling:

    As Plaintiffs have failed to show that there is a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether any Plaintiff actually relied on any of Apple's alleged misrepresentations, the Court concludes that no Plaintiff has standing to pursue either the iDevice or Geolocation claims.
    As noted by the folks over at Reuters, the plaintiffs were allowed to move ahead with the suit in June 2012 alleging the company crafted iOS in such a way that allowed third parties to easily collect personal data without consent. In addition, plaintiffs sought damages for loss of storage space and bandwidth resulting from the alleged secret tracking. The suit involved unhindered access to a cellular-connected device’s unique device identifier (UDID), which ad agencies then used to track an iOS device owner’s usage habits. As a result, Apple imposed restrictions on UDID access in iOS 5 and has since instituted policies to reject App Store submissions that attempt to use the identifier.

    A motion to turn the case into a class action suit was rendered moot in the decision. The ruling comes as a result of Apple’s request for summary judgment in the case, which is actually a follow-up to a similar complaint thrown out by the same court in 2011. The suit claimed Apple knowingly violated privacy rights by allowing ad networks and apps the ability to track the activity of iPhone and iPad users.

    We’ll have to wait and see what comes of the whole ordeal.

    Source: Reuters, Scribd

    Twitter: @AkshayMasand

  2. #2
    Livin the iPhone Life steve-z17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,234
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 141 Times in 121 Posts

    Good call by the Judge. Four ppl suing because they lost storage space and bandwidth...wow!

  3. #3
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    60
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-z17 View Post
    Good call by the Judge. Four ppl suing because they lost storage space and bandwidth...wow!
    Incorrect, they sued because they felt their privacy was being breeched. The judge said that the only way it harmed them was the loss of storage space and bandwidth. In my opinion, the judge should consider the big picture and throw some kind of punishment apples way for allowing 3rd parties access to our devices. The whole connected devices and privacy thing is a HUGE issue and definitely needs to be changed. And the worst part is every company is a part of it, thankfully apple seems the most willing to change policies with the privacy of the end user in mind, but nonetheless, consumer privacy in the mobile market is almost nonexistent.

  4. #4
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    401
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 42 Times in 34 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-z17 View Post
    Good call by the Judge. Four ppl suing because they lost storage space and bandwidth...wow!
    Good call judge the judge should have made those four pay something for being soo stupid and tying up the courts with this kind of foolishness

  5. #5
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    176
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by redline11786 View Post
    Incorrect, they sued because they felt their privacy was being breeched. The judge said that the only way it harmed them was the loss of storage space and bandwidth. In my opinion, the judge should consider the big picture and throw some kind of punishment apples way for allowing 3rd parties access to our devices. The whole connected devices and privacy thing is a HUGE issue and definitely needs to be changed. And the worst part is every company is a part of it, thankfully apple seems the most willing to change policies with the privacy of the end user in mind, but nonetheless, consumer privacy in the mobile market is almost nonexistent.
    ONLY, if the parts about privacy are not already covered by the Ts & Cs which people refuse to read, (and if it is it should be removed). You own the device but license the software.

  6. #6
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    60
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

    Well it's not like consumers have much of a choice with the T's and C's. It's not like you can refuse one part of it and accept the others. It's an all or non deal that forces one to either agree or disagree. If one disagrees, what are they left with?

  7. #7
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    176
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by redline11786 View Post
    Well it's not like consumers have much of a choice with the T's and C's. It's not like you can refuse one part of it and accept the others. It's an all or non deal that forces one to either agree or disagree. If one disagrees, what are they left with?
    A good point but the authorities need a kind of FRAND for consumers and this should be in palin english for thise who take out the contract.

  8. #8
    Livin the iPhone Life steve-z17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,234
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 141 Times in 121 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by redline11786 View Post
    incorrect, they sued because they felt their privacy was being breeched. The judge said that the only way it harmed them was the loss of storage space and bandwidth. In my opinion, the judge should consider the big picture and throw some kind of punishment apples way for allowing 3rd parties access to our devices. The whole connected devices and privacy thing is a huge issue and definitely needs to be changed. And the worst part is every company is a part of it, thankfully apple seems the most willing to change policies with the privacy of the end user in mind, but nonetheless, consumer privacy in the mobile market is almost nonexistent.

    no! Bad!

  9. #9
    dsg
    dsg is online now
    Livin the iPhone Life dsg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,829
    Thanks
    3,476
    Thanked 1,975 Times in 771 Posts

    it seems you can't expect justice in an American court
    privacy isn't about having something to hide

    look here all grammar police, indulge me.

  10. #10
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    60
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

    No you can, it just costs the right amount of money.

  11. #11
    dsg
    dsg is online now
    Livin the iPhone Life dsg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,829
    Thanks
    3,476
    Thanked 1,975 Times in 771 Posts

    human rights are diminishing so fast, it unbelievable
    privacy isn't about having something to hide

    look here all grammar police, indulge me.

  12. #12
    iPhone? More like MyPhone starkall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    132
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    I'm sure apple just threw the judge a decent check to get rid of the problem.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bklyn NY !!
    Posts
    913
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked 62 Times in 51 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by starkall View Post
    I'm sure apple just threw the judge a decent check to get rid of the problem.
    +1

    she's had 3 apple cases so far (apple has won them or had them thrown out) and she's getting another one against Samsung. we already know the outcome.

  14. #14
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    220
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Ambi_Valence View Post
    ONLY, if the parts about privacy are not already covered by the Ts & Cs which people refuse to read, (and if it is it should be removed). You own the device but license the software.
    State law supersedes what is in the Ts & Cs.

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts