Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
Mac Newsforums, a part of the
07-29-2013, 05:03 PM #1
USPTO Finalizes Rejection of Apple's Pinch-to-Zoom Patent
The United States Patent and Trademark Office recently issued a “final” rejection of Apple’s pinch-to-zoom patent, opening the door for chief rival, Samsung, to push back even more against its loss in last summer’s $1.05 billion patent infringement. According to FOSS Patents, Samsung filed notice with U.S. courts of the USPTO’s decision to reject all of the claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,844,915. The ruling rejects claims 1 through 21 of Apple’s filing, but holds that they are all subject to reexamination.
The final office action found that Apple’s claims in the patent were both anticipated by prior art references and obvious according to the combination of another two other prior art references. The USPTO had issued a tentative invalidation of Apple’s patent back in December, calling into question just how much of Apple’s $1.05 billion victory over Samsung could remain intact. The pinch-to-zoom patent, according to Apple’s own damages claims, was the most valuable software patent at issue in the case. Florian Mueller noted that the patents that Apple has put forward in its second patent action against Samsung are “on average, considerably more valuable than the ones asserted in the first case.”
The pinch-to-zoom patent isn’t the only one of Apple’s filings to see eventual rejection from the USPTO. In October, the agency invalidated the rubber-banding patent, stating that a number of its claims were anticipated or obvious due to prior art. The result of the USPTO’s “final” action on the patent is open to interpretation though. Apple now has two months to argue the validity of its patent before the invalidation goes into effect. Even following that, there is an appeals process that could see the legal and regulatory action over pinch-to-zoom stretching into mid-2017 or beyond, according to some observers.
Just last year, a Dutch court found that Samsung had not infringed Apple’s pinch-to-zoom patent. Apple has also unsuccessfully asserted that patent in Britain against HTC, as well as in Germany against Samsung and Motorola.
The patent war between Apple and Samsung continues.
Source: FOSS Patents, Scribd
07-29-2013, 05:09 PM #2
07-29-2013, 05:53 PM #3
So they can't patent pinch to zoom but they can patent rounded corners.... Something's wrong here
07-29-2013, 06:13 PM #4
Stupid decision. Pinch to zoom was and still is a trademark of the iPhone. It was showcased at the first WWDC when it was introduced.
07-29-2013, 06:59 PM #5
Huh? Does this mean that Apple can't claim exclusivity over "pinch to zoom"? Or that they didn't come up with it first?
07-29-2013, 10:31 PM #6
Wasn't pinch-to-zoom in 2002's Minority Report?
07-30-2013, 06:03 AM #7
Last edited by jOnGarrett; 07-30-2013 at 06:13 AM.
07-30-2013, 12:36 PM #8
It sounds like its an issue with wording more than anything but I'm no expert. You can patent a shape with round corners but not an action that no one performed before the iPhone dropped? All i can say is get out of court and use the millions of $$ you waste there on new tech.
07-30-2013, 01:27 PM #9
07-30-2013, 03:02 PM #10
Have a look at this article as well as the references at the bottom.
Here are some interesting tidbits:In 1983 the video-based Video Place/Video Desk system of Myron Krueger was influential in development of multi-touch gestures such as pinch-to-zoom.An advance occurred in 1991, when Pierre Wellner published a paper on his multi-touch "Digital Desk", which supported multi-finger and pinching motions.
07-30-2013, 05:44 PM #11
So did someone have a patent on this already? No! Apple applied properly for the Patent. Once again America is supporting foreign companies. What a joke! U support an American company where the profits are here. Shame on so called Americans who buy Samdung and bash Apple. Go live in Korea.