Results 1 to 14 of 14

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Judge Finds Apple GUILTY of Conspiring to Raise eBook Prices

  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Michael Essany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana
    Posts
    3,782
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 1,480 Times in 566 Posts

    Default Judge Finds Apple GUILTY of Conspiring to Raise eBook Prices


    The verdict is in.... and Apple is guilty.

    This morning, a federal judge ruled that the Cupertino, California-based tech behemoth did, indeed, conspire with five major publishers in order to raise the retail prices of e-books.

    U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in Manhattan found "compelling evidence" that Apple violated federal antitrust law by playing a "central role" in a conspiracy with the publishers to eliminate retail price competition and raise e-book prices.
    According to Reuters, the decision could expose Apple to "substantial damages."

    All told, Apple's loss is a victory for the U.S. Department of Justice and the 33 U.S. states and territories that brought the civil antitrust case against the Mac maker.

    "Apple chose to join forces with the publisher defendants to raise e-book prices and equipped them with the means to do so," Cote said in a 159-page decision. "Without Apple's orchestration of this conspiracy, it would not have succeeded as it did."

    "This result is a victory for millions of consumers who choose to read books electronically," Bill Baer, head of the Justice Department's antitrust division, subsequently stated. "This decision by the court is a critical step in undoing the harm caused by Apple's illegal actions."

    Apple, we're told, plans to appeal.

    Source: Reuters

  2. #2
    Livin the iPhone Life KraXik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Winchester, UK
    Posts
    2,624
    Thanks
    2,671
    Thanked 1,754 Times in 891 Posts

    Uh oh

  3. #3
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,139
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Everyone knows Apple is guilty even Apple knows it is guilty, appealing is just wasting time and money of people who pays taxes (another jab at Apple).

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by unison999 View Post
    Everyone knows Apple is guilty even Apple knows it is guilty, appealing is just wasting time and money of people who pays taxes (another jab at Apple).
    another crack smoking judge that has a hard on for Apple !

  5. #5

  6. #6
    Yah good for us, we continue to go after American Companies. Good job, in the meantime Samdung copies and gets away with it and the US apauds them and US consumers support them. Morons.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by cgfusion View Post
    Yah good for us, we continue to go after American Companies. Good job, in the meantime Samdung copies and gets away with it and the US apauds them and US consumers support them. Morons.
    And what has apple done to promote innovation in design in the last 4 years?

  8. #8
    This was just a quick way for states to shore up their budgets by going after what was then the richest company in the world

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by ninja279 View Post
    This was just a quick way for states to shore up their budgets by going after what was then the richest company in the world
    still is

  10. #10
    Yep, saw this coming from eight miles away. They obviously price-fixed.

    Now Apple has to be taken to task for price-fixing the apps on the App Store.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by bry2k2 View Post
    And what has apple done to promote innovation in design in the last 4 years?
    Yeah that's true, they haven't done as much innovation throughout these past years. Apple needs to kick things up, we all know apple can make some great innovations

  12. #12
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,139
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by cgfusion View Post
    Yah good for us, we continue to go after American Companies. Good job, in the meantime Samdung copies and gets away with it and the US apauds them and US consumers support them. Morons.
    American company that keeps money off shore and pays 2% tax.
    American company that sends work to China to have everything made.
    American company that stops innovation by lawsuit, square shape with rounded corners? Really?

    Quote Originally Posted by ninja279 View Post
    This was just a quick way for states to shore up their budgets by going after what was then the richest company in the world
    In this particular case not at all, Apple's price fixing actually makes U.S. government more money.
    And yes it is good for us because consumer do not have to pay hardcover book prices on something that is digitally transmitted with very little in cost compare to actual books. I've seen price for digital books cost less before Apple and significantly higher after Apple's price fixing.
    As to people who says publishers being strong armed into lower their price by Amazon, guess what? If you don't like it you can stop selling their books on Amazon!! Only sell your books on Apple and bookstores!
    I've not bought 1 eBook since Apple started selling eBooks, and I will not buy another eBook until I see the eBooks I like prices is significantly lower than print.

  13. #13
    My iPhone is a Part of Me vinaygoel2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    748
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 76 Times in 61 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by unison999 View Post
    American company that stops innovation by lawsuit, square shape with rounded corners? Really?
    Really?


  14. #14
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,139
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Yeah really! We are talking about a shape!!!
    Did Apple invent square shape with rounded corners?
    No! Because they were on plenty of other phones out there before Apple iPhone, try looking searching for LG Prada that came before iPhone.
    Here is picture of inadmissable evidence because "it was submitted too late" during the original court hearing.
    -samsung-pre-iphone-designs-640x418.png

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •