+ Reply
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Apple and Department of Justice Present Closing Arguments in E-Books Antitrust Trial

is a discussion within the

Mac News

forums, a part of the

General Apple/Mac

section;
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Akshay Masand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,783
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 118 Times in 104 Posts

    Default Apple and Department of Justice Present Closing Arguments in E-Books Antitrust Trial


    After just over two weeks of litigation, the USA vs. Apple, Inc. concluded with closing arguments from both Apple and the Department of Justice. AllThingsD reports that Apple’s lead counsel, Orin Snyder, closed out the trial with a slick Keynote presentation, as the company’s lawyers have been doing throughout the trial. At one point, the PowerPoint presentation the Government’ s lawyers were using failed to play audio, with the Judge noting that they weren’t using a Mac.

    Apple did not conspire with a single publisher to fix prices in the e-book industry," Snyder said, arguing that the negotiations under scrutiny in this case were nothing more than "standard, lawful business activity." And the DOJ’s claim that they were more than that, a nefarious plot over which Apple served as ringmaster, is entirely unsupported. "All of the government’s evidence is ambiguous at best," Snyder argued, lambasting the DOJ’s case as one built on "word games and inferences.
    The final slide shows an iPad with the text “It’s time to close the book on this case.”

    The Department of Justice has argued that Apple was the “ringmaster” of a scheme to raise e-book pricing across the industry. The government mentioned Apple convinced publishing companies to work together to set pricing above the $9.99 price point that Amazon was selling books at before the iPad came out. The Department of Justice’s slides are also available from AllThingsD as well for anyone interested in checking it out (just hit the source links below).

    U.S. District Judge Denise Cote is expected to have a final judgment within a few weeks. Both sides agreed to have a judge hear and decide on the case rather than present it to a jury. We’ll have to patiently wait to see what happens.

    Source: AllThingsD (1) (2)

    Twitter: @AkshayMasand

  2. #2
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,128
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Do we really have to wait?
    Preliminary judgement already showed his true color with his relaxed tone during the preliminary judgement, he/she is already bought by Apple so why are we going through all this charade pretending it will be a hard decision? If he/she can't sleep at night is because he/she is excited thinking about all the cash he/she is going to get from this case.

  3. #3
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    59
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by unison999 View Post
    Do we really have to wait?
    Preliminary judgement already showed his true color with his relaxed tone during the preliminary judgement, he/she is already bought by Apple so why are we going through all this charade pretending it will be a hard decision? If he/she can't sleep at night is because he/she is excited thinking about all the cash he/she is going to get from this case.
    What a completely ridiculous and ignorant comment...

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to LithePanther For This Useful Post:

    vinaygoel2000 (06-21-2013)

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts