+ Reply
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: ITC to Revisit Previous Decision between Apple and Motorola

is a discussion within the

Mac News

forums, a part of the

General Apple/Mac

section;
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Akshay Masand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,905
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 122 Times in 107 Posts

    Default ITC to Revisit Previous Decision between Apple and Motorola


    The U.S. International Trade Commission recently announced that it will be reviewing an administrative law judge’s decision that previously cleared Apple of infringing on certain Motorola patents, which in turn allowed the company to continue iPhone sales in the country. More specifically, the commission will be revisiting the validity of a ruling from the Administrative Law Judge Thomas Pender.

    One of the issues brought up is a proximity sensor patent that shuts off a handset’s display when it is raised to a user’s ear, thereby preventing errant touches and accidental hang ups. As pointed out by the folks at Bloomberg, the patent is the last assertion remaining in Motorola’s case against Apple since the ITC previously cleared the Cupertino California company of infringing upon declared standard-essential 3G properties in August of last year.

    In the initial determination, Judge Pender found that Motorola’s U.S. Patent No. 6,246,862 for "Sensor controlled user interface for portable communication device" was not substantially different. Motorola ended up claiming that the earlier patent was limited to physical push buttons while its own property covered touch screens used in modern smartphones. As of right now, the commission is said to focus on the exact meaning of the claim limitation of “touch sensitive input device” as asserted in Motorola’s patent language with this review. The commission has scheduled to make the final decision on April 22.

    Source: Bloomberg

    Twitter: @AkshayMasand

  2. #2
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    117
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts

    This is such BS, they made their decision, stop wasting our Tax money on something you already decided. Our US government needs to seriously start supporting US companies, just like other countries courts protect their companies.

  3. #3
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    718
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 61 Times in 44 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by cgfusion View Post
    This is such BS, they made their decision, stop wasting our Tax money on something you already decided. Our US government needs to seriously start supporting US companies, just like other countries courts protect their companies.
    Motorola is a US company, genius.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to CZroe For This Useful Post:

    Mrteacup (02-20-2013)

  5. #4
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by CZroe View Post
    Motorola is a US company, genius.
    LOL. You're right but it's still wrong to revive something that was already settled.

  6. #5
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    718
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 61 Times in 44 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by perealb View Post
    LOL. You're right but it's still wrong to revive something that was already settled.
    Not if it was settled incorrectly. That's like saying that it's wrong to free an innocent man on death row because his guilt was already settled. It's wrong to convict an innocent man in the same way that it's wrong to punish or decide against an innocent party in a lawsuit.

  7. #6
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,088
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts

    Technically it's double jeopardy. They are looking at different terms if they are revisiting a settled agreement.

  8. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bklyn NY !!
    Posts
    913
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked 62 Times in 51 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by cgfusion View Post
    This is such BS, they made their decision, stop wasting our Tax money on something you already decided. Our US government needs to seriously start supporting US companies, just like other countries courts protect their companies.
    do you say the same when others win their case against apple? do you say "move on"? apple gets awarded vague and broad patents all the time, they sue and win. In this case as with others, Judges say the patent lawsuits brought against apple must be more specific. now THAT's BS.

  9. #8
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    718
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 61 Times in 44 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Mrteacup View Post
    Technically it's double jeopardy. They are looking at different terms if they are revisiting a settled agreement.
    That's not what Double Jeopardy means. If someone had been punished for the crime and served it completely, they can't be punished for that specific instance of the crime again. How does that apply to a retrial that could result in a reversed decision or support the previous one? Punishing twice was never on the table.

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts