Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
10-26-2012, 06:50 AM #1
Apple Posts "Samsung Didn't Copy iPad" Notice as per Court Request
Apple recently posted their “Samsung didn’t copy iPad” notice in compliance with a U.K. court ruling. The notice is a rather long and meticulously crafted one by Apple’s lawyers and not surprisingly, it’s written in anything but laymen’s terms.
The notice mentions patents rather than devices and it gets its own back at the end by citing a German court ruling that did find Samsung violated Apple’s design, and well as their massive, billion dollar win over Samsung in U.S. courts. For those of you who are interested in reading full note, you can do so below:
Samsung / Apple UK judgment
On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the High court is available on the following link Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc  EWHC 1882 (Pat) (09 July 2012).
In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:
"The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design."
"The informed user's overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool."
That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc  EWCA Civ 1339 (18 October 2012). There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.
However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad.
10-26-2012, 08:07 AM #2
They shouldn't even be talking about the German or US court decision in that apology. US and German courts have nothing to do with the decisions made in the UK.
I can see Apple getting a slap for this so called statement, they are are not following the rules laid out to them, our Judges take a very dim very of companies not following their instructions
10-26-2012, 08:18 AM #3
Wow, talk about a new low for apple. They are a sneaky lawyer-driven company, indeed. They should receive a major fine for this, and next thing you know they will be forced to post a note written by the court (not their PR department) on the webpage.
10-26-2012, 08:53 AM #4
Wasn't the Germany Case overturned? I think it did.
So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad.
South Korea, Japan, Germany, Netherlands, U.K., have found Samsung not guilt. Apple are getting no where with the battles in Australia, France or Italy.
Only U.S. and in particular, California, has sided with Apple - but no surprise there, the U.S.P.O is probably posting record revenues the past few years.
Last edited by feidhlim1986; 10-26-2012 at 08:58 AM.
The Following User Says Thank You to feidhlim1986 For This Useful Post:
10-26-2012, 09:11 AM #5
How Arrogant have Appl£ become!!!!!
The Following User Says Thank You to dsg For This Useful Post:
10-26-2012, 09:16 AM #6
Ok. Children enough is enough, if you don't stop fighting. I'm pulling and spanking you both.
Jeez, seems like it is getting ridiculous. No?
10-26-2012, 09:52 AM #7
It's interesting,and funny already,I think that Apple want to troll their,and they can,BUT,it's not serious at the judge
10-26-2012, 10:16 AM #8
Lol. The last paragraph is written brilliantly.
Love how they point out the judge saying the iPad is better too!
Also this is not an apology. Nowhere do they say sorry. They just point out facts. That's it.
Last edited by KraXik; 10-26-2012 at 10:18 AM.
10-26-2012, 10:18 AM #9
Apple really do suck, as I keep saying and they keep doing crap like that proving me right.
The Following User Says Thank You to NakedFaerie For This Useful Post:
10-26-2012, 10:58 AM #10
I have to say the UK government and laws are well not so good, ie, a r*pist sometimes gets like 3 years. There's a reason why US is pulling out of its financial crisis, Germany isn't even in a crisis and the UK is lagging behind with all the cuts.
However there's no denying the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and the Galaxy S were knock off Apple's design and because of that, Samsung has gained a HUGE flock of sheep buying every Galaxy device.
Last edited by MetallicaFan1991; 10-26-2012 at 11:00 AM.
10-26-2012, 11:12 AM #11
Translating from lawyer speak to English all they are basically saying is that the UK court found Samsung not guilty for copying Apple although the judge noted that Apples device was cool and Samsung's was not. However despite the result of the hearing Apple has won other court cases and is a superior device.
You may think that it is wrong for Apple to take advantage of the so called apology notice that has been asked for them but you forget that just like any other company even though they innovate more than most and occasionally care for their customers they are still a business and still in it to make money. People will visit Apple's website and then note that a judge said Apple's device is cooler than Samsung's and that may be the deciding factor in purchasing the tablet over a competitors.
Should that be in there? Probably not but then the judge shouldn't have said it if they didn't want it to go in the apology.
10-26-2012, 11:51 AM #12
Oh, how cute... You must be new in interacting with U.S. companies...
Last edited by quidam_brujah; 10-26-2012 at 11:58 AM.
10-26-2012, 12:08 PM #13
"The German economy is continuing to falter," said Ifo president Hans-Werner Sinn.
UK wellbeing still 13% below pre-crisis levels
Data shows long-lasting decline in living standards as Bank of England chief hints that UK is emerging from recession
10-26-2012, 01:43 PM #14
10-26-2012, 02:18 PM #15
10-26-2012, 03:02 PM #16
Atta boy Apple
10-26-2012, 03:53 PM #17
Congratulations on hands down THE dumbest most ignorant and idiotic comment I've ever seen anywhere on the Internet. You're right up there with people that comment "1st" on new posts all over the net. Nice one. Yay you, idiot.
Actually regarding the article, I think apple trying to pull a fast one as far as the notice goes will backfire with the courts here. Can't wait for them to get another dressing down.
10-26-2012, 03:54 PM #18
10-26-2012, 05:33 PM #19
10-28-2012, 02:39 PM #20