Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
Thread: Apple's New Mac Mini Benchmarked
10-25-2012, 02:03 AM #1
Apple's New Mac Mini Benchmarked
After Apple recently announced a refresh for the Mac mini, a pair of Mac colocation companies performed teardowns and benchmark tests of Apple’s new device. The result: Apple’s small format desktop performance is approaching that of legacy Xserves and 2010’s Mac Pro.
For those of you who didn't know, Apple recently announced a refresh for the Mac mini on Tuesday at a special event. The new iteration is largely seen as an incremental upgrade from last year’s model and doesn't feature a new design like the super thin iMac, however the internal upgrades are substantial enough to boost the tiny computer’s performance. In a recent blog post, Macminicolo noted that the biggest upgrades to the new machine are Intel’s Ivy Bridge processors and the option to configure up to 16GB of 1600MHz RAM straight from Apple. The entry level offering now comes with 4GB (instead of just 2GB, which was just barely enough to run OS X Mountain Lion).
Mac Mini Vault also performed a quick teardown of the new model, finding that not much has changed besides a different fan design, the move to Hitachi HDDs, and updated antenna connections. The company also performed an identical Geekbench test and found that its out-of-the-box unit running OS X 10.8.1 scored 7433, compared to the 2011 Mac mini updated to OS X 10.8.2, which scored 6583.
The new Mac mini is already for sale, starting with a standard $599 configuration powered by an Intel 2.5GHz dual-core i5 chip, 4GB of RAM, a 500GB HDD and integrated Intel HD 4000 graphics. The most expensive configuration comes with OS X Mountain Lion Server, a 2.3GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 processor, 4GB of memory, Two 1TB HDDs and Intel HD 4000 graphics.
Will any of you be getting a new Mac mini?
Source: Macminicolo, Mac Mini Vault
10-25-2012, 04:27 AM #2
Without discreet GPU MacMini becomes extremely overpriced piece-o-shi. For 700$ (lowest option with 8Gb of ram) it is only good for office work... lolwut?
I used to love these little buggers when they had nvidia in them. Now? Useless in too many ways a way too steeply priced for what is it good for.
10-25-2012, 05:36 AM #3
10-25-2012, 06:02 AM #4i hate kids who comment.
This mini is a godsend for many smaller environments.
Please learn: what you want, may not be what's best in every situation, kid. Or better yet, stop posting.My iPhone 4 Mod Flickr Stream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/54754025@N07/
10-25-2012, 06:43 AM #5
Hint: Calling some kid without knowing who are you writing to at all makes any valuable thoughts in your post degrade to the non-existent level.
You obviosly fail to read and comprehend what was written, re-read last sentence of my previous post as many times, as you need to understand the meaning of it.
My 2007 mini serves ejabberd, potfix+dovecot, nginx (hosting roundcube) along with tomcat (hosting alfresco) and murmur. Moreover it acts as a wi-fi router. But only because i have upgraded to more recent hardware and had no other use for it. You may guess what OS is installed on it.
P.S. Re-read hint number one yet again, and again if you need to.
P.P.S. And oh yes, again, new mini for the price it is priced is useless.PRAETORIANNI NONNUMQUAM IN PROELIO NUMQUAM IN BELLO SUPERANTUR
10-25-2012, 06:54 AM #6
I do have to say what is it with people on the Internet and their obsession with apostrophes? The word is aimed. I don't know what aim'd means. The apostrophe is nowhere near the e on a keyboard, so it can't be a typo.Hmm...
10-25-2012, 06:59 AM #7
Don't forget that you are probably in less than 1% of their target audience by doing all of this nonsense. Most people don't care to have a [overpriced] domain at their house and if they spend $700 on a computer they want to actually use it however they like, lol. Get off your high horse, this doesn't make you look smart in any way, you just look like a playground bully.
10-25-2012, 09:32 AM #8
10-25-2012, 09:42 AM #9
What kind of specs, components, and wattage do you think those tasks need? See how I can turn a pointless question around? You don't need massive specs or specialized components for that type of functionality.
10-25-2012, 11:46 AM #10
GA-Z77N-WIFI, Intel i3-3225, IN WIN IW-BQ656T (the case), Crucial Ballistix sport 8GB (kit of two 4GB) lastly Hitachi GST Travelstar 7K750.
Thats: 130 + 145 + 50 + 35 + 60$ = 410$
In which i have used probably THE most expensive mini-itx motherboard, with two gigabit ethernet ports (meaning it, unlike mini without thunderbolt-to-ethernet anything, can go wired router right away). I have a slightly better clocked CPU with the same HD4000 intel integrated, have same amount of RAM and 7200 RPM hdd vs. 5400 in Mini. With slightly larger case, and 95W vs. 85W of Mini's.
What can i do with the additional 290$? Well, go check yourself to that of your liking.
Want OSX on it? Add three drivers available from the community and about an hour of reading the installation instructions, but... who in seriousness would make "domain/vpn/mail/router/teamspeak/etc..." server out of OSX?
Oh, and don't forget, that apple, with their leverage, buy hardware much cheaper than i, average consumer, from reseller of reseller.
I, myself, unless it is clear from my info, use Apples alongside with non-Apples. So anti-apple/fanboy/whatever arguments are a waste of everyone's time.
Last edited by dennder; 10-25-2012 at 01:22 PM.PRAETORIANNI NONNUMQUAM IN PROELIO NUMQUAM IN BELLO SUPERANTUR
10-25-2012, 11:48 AM #11
Ding, Ding, Ding,
Round one goes to Dennder and BIMPtacular.
Lets keep it clean and no hits below the belt.
10-25-2012, 12:03 PM #12
10-25-2012, 12:59 PM #13
I was initially very excited about the refresh but the lack of a discreet GPU was definitely a turnoff. I was thinking of using it as a HTPC and now I'm split between this and a refurbished 2011 model.
10-25-2012, 01:33 PM #14
I found out the hard way how good were displays in desktop Macs trying to find a decent replacement, that would not cost thousands of dollars (like Eizo/Nec's), when my 24" 2008y model died out of GPU overheat and took display assembly with it.
Building temporary hackintosh was one-day job, but the display...PRAETORIANNI NONNUMQUAM IN PROELIO NUMQUAM IN BELLO SUPERANTUR
10-25-2012, 03:13 PM #15
10-25-2012, 07:30 PM #16
I did say that my gaming machine, which cost me $1200 and runs Windows btw, is capable of doing everything on that list while gaming. So why would you spend $700 for a machine dedicated to those tasks? Which implies that you have another system for gaming/productivity and I'm sure the two together cost well over the price of my single desktop, especially for an Apple fanboy.
It is overpriced for what it is no matter how you spin it. I understand you might want to waste your money, but my point is don't try to belittle the people who don't want to.