Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
Mac Newsforums, a part of the
07-20-2012, 11:02 PM #1
Kent Walker: Some Apple Patents Should Be Tech Standards
Apple CEO Tim Cook previously said that he wants other companies to “invent their own stuff,” and that Apple shouldn’t be the “inventor for the world.” Google Senior Vice President and General Counsel Kent Walker seems to disagree with the statement and even went as far as writing a letter to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee arguing that commercial inventions that impact “consumer welfare” should be just as important as technical patents. John Paczkowski of All Things D shared the following interpretation of Walker’s argument:
In other words, Google’s view is that just as there are patents that are standard essential, there are also patents that are commercially essential — patents that cover features that are so popular as to have become ubiquitous. The latter are just as ripe for abuse as the former, and withholding them is just as harmful to consumers and the competitive marketplace. Viewed through that lens, multitouch technology or slide-to-unlock might be treated the same way as an industry standard patent on, say, a smartphone radio.
The capabilities of an iPhone are categorically different from a conventional phone, and result from Apple’s ability to bring its traditional innovation in computing to the mobile market. Using an iPhone to take photos, manage a home-finance spreadsheet, play video games, or run countless other applications has nothing to do with standardized protocols. Apple spent billions in research and development to create the iPhone, and third party software developers have spent billions more to develop applications that run on it.
Source: All Things D
07-21-2012, 12:53 AM #2
I agree with both. Well put that some of ten should be tech standards but sometimes it looks like they really do just copy apple
07-21-2012, 01:26 AM #3
The funny thing is this sites information is always different about how great ios and a dated iphone is
07-21-2012, 04:04 AM #4
Some Apple patents shouldn't have been granted in the first place
07-21-2012, 04:56 AM #5
Wow! I'm just glad someone feels the same way....
07-21-2012, 05:05 AM #6
That's pretty dumb. Walker wants some Apple patents to be considered standard simply because they're popular. So, the more successful your company becomes the less right you have to patents, his logic goes.
Apple's lawyer is absolutely correct. Walker either doesn't understand patent law or is openly and offensively bitter. Or both and he's attempting some type of slow character assassination of Apple by trying to drum up anti-Apple sentiment on the web. He's appears to be politicizing a purely business issue.
Apparently Walker wants to redistribute Apple's wealth. Google's Socialist colors are certainly shining through. It's pretty sickening.
07-21-2012, 09:08 AM #7
What google really means is it has made a mistake!! Rather than making a great google/andriod phone it has made a os that is good on one or two phones then just **** on others! So now wants the good bits of ios don't get me wrong iOS could be better! And the iPhone needs a major upgrade of some sort!
07-21-2012, 09:10 AM #8
07-21-2012, 09:49 AM #9
guys apple ordered for those patents BEFORE they were popular they were granted because apple had insight. Apple didn't get those patents a week after they asked for them they got them years after
07-21-2012, 10:39 AM #10
Isn't Apple founded by copying everything? I do belive the first Apple computer was a copy of a PC from Microsoft.
And things like Siri isn't Apples as they just stole the idea from someone else. Yea, they brought it but they now say its their idea where its not it was someone elses first.
And how do they get patents in the first place? The last I read was scroll bars. I do believe it was again Microsoft and Explorer which started the scroll bars so again Apple just stole the idea and said its theirs.
I would love to see Apple go under and loose everything as they deserve it with all the crap they put others through.
07-21-2012, 10:55 AM #11
07-21-2012, 01:37 PM #12
07-21-2012, 03:18 PM #13
Siri is apples property since they bought it - therefore they can patent it, what's wrong with that?
If you realise, the patent specifically saysThe vertical bar has a vertical position on top of the displayed portion of the electronic document that corresponds to the vertical position in the electronic document of the displayed portion of the electronic document. After a predetermined condition is met, display of the vertical bar is ceased.
07-21-2012, 04:55 PM #14
07-21-2012, 05:36 PM #15
07-21-2012, 06:06 PM #16
07-21-2012, 09:22 PM #17
Still a bit fresh at this...and will evolve to FRESH in a Bel Air type of way!
07-21-2012, 09:33 PM #18
07-22-2012, 06:48 AM #19
So many arguments so little time. Big Business an be an ugly machine. Fighting over pennies that become billions is also normal in our time of technology boom. At the same time ALL companies borrow cheat and steal from one another. There are very few "original ideas" out there. We seem to have enhancements on existing tech before a revolutionary product any day of the week. The last couple of iPhones are testaments to that..although i purchased both. Not complaining just my opinion. As long as there is competition there will be finger pointing and lawsuits as its the foundation of this game that they play..happy suing haha!
07-23-2012, 05:57 PM #20
Patient should be granted to protect original ideas but apple did abuse the system and patient some very basic things. Open your eyes and stop protecting apple just cause you're a Fanboy! heck, i love my iPhone and i don't give a crap about an android right now but the some of these apple patient are ridicules.