+ Reply
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: San Francisco Drops Apple After Apple Drops EPEAT Certification

is a discussion within the

Mac News

forums, a part of the

General Apple/Mac

section;
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Michael Essany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana
    Posts
    3,671
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 1,475 Times in 562 Posts

    Default San Francisco Drops Apple After Apple Drops EPEAT Certification


    There's trouble in paradise between local officials and Apple in the city of San Francisco. According to sources close to the matter, San Francisco city officials want all municipal agencies to be barred from purchasing Apple computers and laptops. Why? Apple isn't "green" enough.

    Inflaming the situation was the recent move on Apple's part to pull the green electronics certification off its Mac computers. And, according to the Wall Street Journal, utter pandemonium broke out among officials in San Francisco as a result of the controversial decision.

    Apple had removed its laptops and notebooks from a voluntary registry of green electronics, called EPEAT. The standard, created jointly by manufacturers, including Apple, government agencies, and activist groups, requires that electronics products be designed for ease in recycling and higher energy efficiency.
    For now, Apple won't comment on the matter. But officials in San Francisco are certainly more than happy to discuss the debacle.

    “We are disappointed that Apple chose to withdraw from EPEAT,” Melanie Nutter, director of San Francisco’s Department of Environment, tells the WSJ. “We hope that the city saying it will not buy Apple products will make Apple reconsider its participation.”

    In case you're wondering, the decision by San Francisco officials to back away from Apple wasn't a sudden, unexpected move. As it turns out, a longstanding policy in San Francisco "mandates that city funds only be used to purchase EPEAT-certified desktops, laptops and monitors."

    Source: WSJ

  2. #2
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    652
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 32 Times in 29 Posts

    polluting the world...one iPhone at a time. lol

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to lilrican21 For This Useful Post:

    cpotoso (07-10-2012)

  4. #3
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    385
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 40 Times in 33 Posts

    Since the main reason they dropped the cert is the new MACs are "easy to disassemble", it does seem to me that it wouldn't be that hard to make them where they could be. And I'd imagine Jobs would've insisted on it. And it's just the right thing to do. My .02.

    But on the flip side, bu'by San Fran!

  5. #4
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    239
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts

    Hey, we gained 0.1 mm in thickness (or "thinness" as manufacturers now want to claim). Who cares if it pollutes more than necessary.... Apple is evil.

  6. #5
    iPhoneaholic ChicagoV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    391
    Thanks
    106
    Thanked 59 Times in 46 Posts

    The last paragraph is the key. Plain and simple. Still, while reading this I couldn't help but envision the "Hybrid" episode of South Park. "Thaaaannnks!!"
    Reminding you all that YOU'RE YOUR

  7. #6
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    405
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts

    Apparently Apple thinks they are cool enough and irreplaceable now. Guess not.

  8. #7
    What's Jailbreak? jeffrh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Haha! That is funny. I love watching liberals fighting each other....

  9. #8
    Green Apple firetwuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by lilrican21 View Post
    polluting the world...one iPhone at a time. lol
    Troll, if you had been following the debate you would have known that it's not because the products are any less "green" (which is a BS thing to call any electronic equipment) but because their products can't be repaired easily (too much glue). Unless you were trying to be ironic or something, but in that case you fail as well.

  10. #9
    iPhone? More like MyPhone Tario70's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    221
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts

    I'm amazed at some of the comments here:

    For those who say this doesn't pollute more, well, if you have to buy an entirely new machine just for more RAM, that would pollute more because instead of just adding or replacing RAM, you're adding a new laptop to the mix. Just one example.

    To ChicagoV I don't see how this is anything like the South Park episode (which was funny as hell). This isn't San Fran being smug, this is San Fran saying, "If you're going to force us to buy a new laptop every time we want to upgrade something, we're out."

    To Jeffrh who "loves watching liberals fight each other," I ask, what the hell does that have to with the price of tea in China. Clearly you haven't read what the EPEAT certification is because it has less to do with being "green" than it does about ensuring that products can be easily taken apart by consumers. This is a good thing because some of us understand the benefit in being able to upgrade, replace, & repair the parts in our laptop. This saves us a lot of money in repair costs!

    This is a bad move by Apple, but it truly represents their own smugness when it comes to their products. The iPhone? Don't Hack that. The Mac? Buy it one way & if you want to add RAM, replace the battery, or do anything else, BUY a new one.

    Anyone defending the soldering of RAM & the choice of design over adaptability in the new Macbook Pros is blinded by their allegiance to Apple (IMO). I find it extremely ironic that a company founded by tinkerers does so much to prevent anyone from tinkering with the products they make.

    (I know I'll probably be flamed & I am in no way saying a PC Laptop is better, but I disagree with the design choice here & I'll stand by that with my money. Apple can continue to allow me to do less & less with their machines & I will continue to buy less & less from them)
    Last edited by Tario70; 07-10-2012 at 11:22 PM.

  11. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 67 Times in 37 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Essany View Post
    “We are disappointed that Apple chose to withdraw from EPEAT,” Melanie Nutter, director of San Francisco’s Department of Environment, tells the WSJ. “We hope that the city saying it will not buy Apple products will make Apple reconsider its participation.”
    Aww, isn't that cute. The City of San Francisco thinks Apple gives a crap about them.

    They didn't give a crap when thousands complained about losing all ability to upgrade Macs (but bought them anyway), does anyone really think they give a crap that they won't get a couple thousand purchases from San Fran next update cycle? They have more then enough fanboy sheep to fill that void, and they know it.

  12. #11
    iPhone? More like MyPhone Beastly L92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New Braunfels, Texas
    Posts
    151
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    To believe any of the the green-hybrid-globo-warmage trash, one has to look at what the movement is fighting against. Carbon dioxide, aka building block of life on this planet, aka the stuff every plant breathes. And grown humans capable of vast critical thinking accept the notion that it can be taxed into exile. It's as comical as placing a tax ban on oxygen because it's flammable.

    Good for you, Apple. Now, if only they'd refuse to pay carbon taxes or purchase carbon offsets. That might wake the rest of the world. Well, the first world, anyways since the third world is exempt.

  13. #12
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,088
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts

    Companies like these are PATHETIC. They see a big company like apple with huge media influence and decide to attack them so for money and publicity. They could attack anyone else cause no one else is exactly "green enough" but they choose apple why? Cause they have money and the media will publish anything about them

  14. #13
    iPhoneaholic ChicagoV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    391
    Thanks
    106
    Thanked 59 Times in 46 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Tario70 View Post
    To ChicagoV I don't see how this is anything like the South Park episode (which was funny as hell). This isn't San Fran being smug, this is San Fran saying, "If you're going to force us to buy a new laptop every time we want to upgrade something, we're out."
    Oh no, I agree completely. I'm simply saying it made me think of that episode. Like I said, the FINAL PARAGRAPH in the article summed it up beautifully.
    Reminding you all that YOU'RE YOUR

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts