Results 1 to 15 of 15

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Patent Case between Apple and Motorola Dismissed "With Prejudice"

  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Akshay Masand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    4,225
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 137 Times in 122 Posts

    Default Patent Case between Apple and Motorola Dismissed "With Prejudice"


    Judge Richard Posner recently dismissed Apple’s smartphone patent claims against Motorola “with prejudice.” For those of you who aren’t familiar with the terminology, it means that the assertions can’t be reargued in front of that particular court.

    In the past, Judge Posner temporarily canceled Apple’s trial in early June citing lack of injury but decided to rehear the case two weeks later. During the second hearing Apple argued for injunctive relief against Motorola’s alleged infringement on four patents which involved heuristics, UI elements, and wireless technology. The court was not keen on the assertions nor Apple’s injunction request where the Cupertino California company asked Motorola to switch to its own solution within three months. Based on the court documents, Judge Posner recommended that Apple license the technology to Motorola. He saw an injunction being “catastrophic” and harmful to consumers noting that issuing an injunction wouldn’t necessarily stop Apple from reasserting the same claims when Motorola switched to another solution three months later.

    According to Judge Posner, "it would be ridiculous to dismiss a suit for failure to prove damages and allow the plaintiff to refile the suit so that he could have a second chance to prove damages. This case is therefore dismissed with prejudice; a separate order to that effect is being entered today." The ruling ends one legal battle that Apple had been fighting in but there are still many patent infringement cases on the horizon.

    Source: The Verge

    Twitter: @AkshayMasand

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Man that was a boring article😞💤💤

  4. #4
    My iPhone is a Part of Me hitman10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    I live in a house
    Posts
    505
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 44 Times in 28 Posts

    i agree.. whatever.

  5. #5
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,117
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 95 Times in 67 Posts

    lol. Silly Apple.

  6. #6
    At last someone is seeing sense and stopping Apple bullying anyone who could be a rival to them

  7. #7
    I also agree, Whatever!

  8. #8
    Well I'm slowly learning that patents mean nothing in the digital age. Any company can get around them and copy another company's ideas and get away with it. Apple patented the hell out of the iPhone and it was copied months later. Maybe Apple should just settle down and realize this sad truth.

  9. #9
    what a waste time with this b... ****....

  10. #10
    My iPhone is a Part of Me iLoveWindows&iPhone's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    594
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 50 Times in 35 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by ddonuts4 View Post
    Well I'm slowly learning that patents mean nothing in the digital age. Any company can get around them and copy another company's ideas and get away with it. Apple patented the hell out of the iPhone and it was copied months later. Maybe Apple should just settle down and realize this sad truth.
    I have had the same sad revelation. This judge completely contradicts himself, and makes me question the entire idea of patents.

    He says Apple should license the patents to Motorola, which obviously implies he believes Motorola IS infringing on Apples patents..... But then he basically says "Oh well, sucks for you Apple", when he states it would be "catastrophic for the consumer" to order Motorola to stop stealing from Apple.

    So this judge is saying its okay for a company to steal another companies patened technology/ideas, as long as the thievery benefits the consumer. How does this make any sense?? Patents exist to protect a companies/persons intellectual property.....NOT the consumer.

    I don't have a lot of knowledge of patents and law, but I know enough to see that this ruling clearly gives a big "F you" to patents and patent holders. Why even have patents if a judge can just rule that he doesn't want to enforce the law? And instead suggests that the patent holder should license out THEIR patent, just because he doesn't want to deal with it anymore.

    It just doesn't seem fair to me... Its not about Apple vs Motorola, it just seems wrong. Thank god the guy from that movie Flash Of Genius didn't have this judge.
    El Zurdo

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by iLoveWindows&iPhone View Post
    He says Apple should license the patents to Motorola, which obviously implies he believes Motorola IS infringing on Apples patents.....
    The judge telling Apple that they should try licensing to others is another way of saying "try to work out your problems yourself."

    Why even have patents if a judge can just rule that he doesn't want to enforce the law?
    Are you saying that a judge in a court of law shouldn't be able to stop abuse when they see it? Are you unaware of how vague so many of these patents are that are held by Apple, as well as others, are? The vast majority of these patents should never have been granted in the first place, based on their vagueness alone. Patents are supposed to be well defining documents, not something that covers such a wide and often difficult to interpret spectrum, and it just comes to show how flawed the patent system has become. Plain and simple, competition should not be held up by the legal system unless real damages can be proven, and Apple failed to do that.
    Last edited by znbl; 06-25-2012 at 12:49 PM.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by znbl View Post
    The judge telling Apple that they should try licensing to others is another way of saying "try to work out your problems yourself."

    Are you saying that a judge in a court of law shouldn't be able to stop abuse when they see it? Are you unaware of how vague so many of these patents are that are held by Apple, as well as others, are? The vast majority of these patents should never have been granted in the first place, based on their vagueness alone. Patents are supposed to be well defining documents, not something that covers such a wide and often difficult to interpret spectrum, and it just comes to show how flawed the patent system has become. Plain and simple, competition should not be held up by the legal system unless real damages can be proven, and Apple failed to do that.
    Would you care to tell me who sent over a year on iOS and the iPhone, only to be copied within months? I don't care how vague the patents are, or what this judge should have done, my point is that patents appear to be meaningless now. No matter what original idea you come up with, someone will always find a way to copy it, getting around your patent.
    If i helped, don't be afraid to hit the thanks button. It won't bite!!!!

    How may I hack you?

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by znbl View Post
    The judge telling Apple that they should try licensing to others is another way of saying "try to work out your problems yourself."

    Are you saying that a judge in a court of law shouldn't be able to stop abuse when they see it? Are you unaware of how vague so many of these patents are that are held by Apple, as well as others, are? The vast majority of these patents should never have been granted in the first place, based on their vagueness alone. Patents are supposed to be well defining documents, not something that covers such a wide and often difficult to interpret spectrum, and it just comes to show how flawed the patent system has become. Plain and simple, competition should not be held up by the legal system unless real damages can be proven, and Apple failed to do that.
    You clearly have no idea what patents were put in place to do.

    Start here: Watch | Everything Is a Remix

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by arem View Post
    You clearly have no idea what patents were put in place to do.

    Start here: Watch | Everything Is a Remix
    That makes perfect sense lol.
    If i helped, don't be afraid to hit the thanks button. It won't bite!!!!

    How may I hack you?

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by ddonuts4 View Post
    Would you care to tell me who sent over a year on iOS and the iPhone, only to be copied within months?
    You're seriously trying to say Apple developed the iPhone all buy them selves and never copied any elements from others like the LG Prada that came out before it? Your ignorance is astounding. For starters, FingerWorks developed the touch and gesture features that the iPhone, and there are other elements and ideas that were either acquired or copied outright.

    I don't care how vague the patents are, or what this judge should have done, my point is that patents appear to be meaningless now. No matter what original idea you come up with, someone will always find a way to copy it, getting around your patent.
    If they are meaningless, it's because of the misuse of the system by entities like Apple, who file 200+ patents, the majority of which are way too vague and should never have been granted, to say nothing about the ones for ideas that they outright copied from others.
    Last edited by znbl; 06-26-2012 at 12:04 PM.

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •