Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: It's Official: Apple Warns of Legal Action Over Jobs Action Figure

  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Michael Essany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana
    Posts
    3,852
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 1,482 Times in 568 Posts

    Default It's Official: Apple Warns of Legal Action Over Jobs Action Figure


    As MMi's Phillip Swanson reported Monday, a 12 Steve Jobs action figure from toy company "In Icons" is set to be released in February for $99.

    Unfortunately, there's now a chance that we'll never know if the action figure had the potential of becoming the next G.I. Joe. Because if "In Icons" proceeds to sell the toy next month, they may need G.I. Joe to rescue them from the legal war Apple is reportedly threatening.

    As the U.K. Telegraph reveals today, Apple sent a letter to the Asian toy manufacturer asserting that their product obviously resembles an Apple likeness (meaning Steve Jobs) that belongs to the Cupertino, California-based tech giant.

    Who didn't see this coming?

    As some will recall, Apple succeeded at blocking the sale of other Steve Jobs-related products in the past, including a similar action figure released in 2010 by MiC Gadget.

    Here's my question: if so many people want the Steve Jobs action figure but Apple won't let anyone produce it, why doesn't Apple just launch a new division and release an entire set of sanctioned Apple action figures and toys?

    The revenue potential alone for "Tickle Me Woz" could easily eclipse iPhone sales.

    Source: U.K. Telegraph

  2. #2
    Livin the iPhone Life KraXik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Winchester, UK
    Posts
    2,637
    Thanks
    2,685
    Thanked 1,757 Times in 894 Posts

    Did Apple belong to Steve Jobs or did Steve Jobs belong to Apple???

  3. #3
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,023
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 78 Times in 63 Posts

    Shouldn't Steve Jobs' estate be the one going after this?

  4. #4
    iPhone? More like MyPhone MPS3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Canada GTA
    Posts
    196
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts

    who cares i want a "Tickle Me Woz"

  5. #5
    tickle me wow would kick ***. he's one cool offing dude.

  6. #6
    WTF? I already preorderd. I better get a refund if they dont deliver!

  7. #7
    iPhone? More like MyPhone Eagleye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    265
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked 53 Times in 28 Posts

    ^ That was probably not the brightest move... how could one think this would actually just skate by Apple Legal without a hitch?

  8. #8
    haha is there anything else apple would like to sue about, isnt that like the 3rd article in a month (30 days) that they sued someone for, cuz they obviously need the money....

  9. #9
    I would pay SERIOUS money for a "Tickle Me Woz". Apple really should offer Apple memorabilia items such as toys, actions figures, shirts, etc. The market for that is huge, they just need to make it happen.

  10. #10
    If I had a nickel... thazsar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    4,915
    Thanks
    978
    Thanked 3,259 Times in 1,388 Posts

    I guess Apple has a patent on Steve's face!

  11. #11
    Umm, I don't think Apple has any legitimate claim here. Steve Job's estate would, but not Apple. Honestly, Apple doesn't own the rights to Steve Jobs.

    If someone wanted to make an action figure based on you, the company that you work for can't say that they can't because you belong to them.

  12. #12
    The figure would be epic to have (especially if recalled later) but this just proves how much apple really sucks. If they have to sue everyone for stupid reasons like this then they obviously are going broke.

  13. #13
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bellevue, WA
    Posts
    438
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 46 Times in 41 Posts

    Man, boo-flippin-hoo. Who are they going to sue next, my dog who is dying of cancer? I lose more and more respect for Apple every day.

  14. #14
    What wierdo would buy this?! Hahah so lame

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Airwaves182 For This Useful Post:

    punjabi212 (01-05-2012)

  16. #15
    Livin the iPhone Life celeron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,831
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 340 Times in 323 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by airwaves182 View Post
    what wierdo would buy this?! Hahah so lame
    lmao +1
    If my post was good, click the button in my post

    New to jailbreaking? Have a look at my Redsn0w Guide

  17. #16

  18. #17
    How could any moron think that figure would be acceptable? How can any idiot fault apple or jobs for suing the pants of these guys?

  19. #18
    Maybe they Trademarked/Copyrighted/Patented his image/likeness. Maybe Steve had it done as insurance if he departed (RIP). Who are you to say that they don't own his image? Just Saying.

    Quote Originally Posted by Truckerbear View Post
    This isn't even the same action figure this article is about.

  20. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Airwaves182 View Post
    What wierdo would buy this?! Hahah so lame
    i did.

  21. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Airwaves182 View Post
    What wierdo would buy this?! Hahah so lame
    Why do you have to be a weirdo? What about people that own Elvis and Michael Jackson figures or Princess Diana, etc. Iconic figures man!! If they end up producing them, my SJ "action Figure" will be sitting atop my desk watching me work all day.
    MacBook Pro i7
    Dell XPS

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •