+ Reply
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Apple Victorious Over Psystar Following Two Year Legal Battle

is a discussion within the

Mac News

forums, a part of the

General Apple/Mac

section;
After two long years in the legal legal system, a definitive victor appears to have been declared in the lengthy battle between Apple and Psystar. The U.S. Court of Appeals
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Michael Essany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana
    Posts
    3,727
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 1,479 Times in 565 Posts

    Default Apple Victorious Over Psystar Following Two Year Legal Battle


    After two long years in the legal legal system, a definitive victor appears to have been declared in the lengthy battle between Apple and Psystar.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of Apple with Circuit Judge Mary Schroeder ruling that Psystar's Mac clones did, indeed, infringe upon the copyrights held by Apple. Consequently, the already effective ban on sales of Psystar's products will continue.

    It was way back in late 2009 when Apple was first awarded a permanent injunction against Psystar by the same court. Ever since, Psystar has been fighting back diligently with appeals and everything in its power to shift legal favor back in its court.

    Although many believed Apple's lawsuit would result in a swift slam-dunk for the Cupertino, California-based outfit, Psystar put up a valiant effort and gave Apple a legitimate run for its money. Specifically, Psystar did a laudable job of responding to Apple's lawsuit with a somewhat compelling argument that Apple was "misusing its Mac OS X copyright by requiring customers to only run the software on its own brand of computers."

    But alas, Judge Schroeder determined that the court's ruling in favor of Apple was "just." As a result, it now looks as though Psystar is out of options and may soon put up a permanent white flag following this bitter, protracted battle.


    Source: CNET

  2. #2
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,112
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 94 Times in 66 Posts

    This took two years?

  3. #3
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Yeah wtf

  4. #4
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by RICO_ View Post
    This took two years?
    Welcome to the American judicial system.

  5. #5
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,112
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 94 Times in 66 Posts

    People get Associates Degrees in two years but a court can't render a decision on ONE straight-forward case for two years?

  6. #6
    Livin the iPhone Life Poseidon79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    8,265
    Thanks
    819
    Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by RICO_ View Post
    People get Associates Degrees in two years but a court can't render a decision on ONE straight-forward case for two years?
    If you've ever been involved in any kind of legal dispute you'd know this is normal. Each side must gather evidence... present their case... make motions... ask for more time based on the opposing side's actions... re-scheduled hearings for weeks or months out at a time... appeals... etc.

  7. #7
    dsg
    dsg is offline
    Livin the iPhone Life dsg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,874
    Thanks
    3,683
    Thanked 2,077 Times in 800 Posts

    Psystar were never going to win, it would have been interesting if they had won though

  8. #8
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    1,438
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 185 Times in 145 Posts

    Psystar could just sell the hardware and also sell copies of Mac OS X separately and not preinstalled on their "hackintosh" hardware.

    They'd be selling two products and not breaking any laws or EULAs. If the customer wants to install Mac OS X in this hardware that's the customer breaking the EULA and I'd love to see Apple try sue someone for installing software they have bought on hardware the have bought.

  9. #9
    Green Apple Tomcat50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Really don't see how psystar were going to win. Should of just sold the computer with no software.

  10. #10
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,112
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 94 Times in 66 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Poseidon79 View Post
    If you've ever been involved in any kind of legal dispute you'd know this is normal. Each side must gather evidence... present their case... make motions... ask for more time based on the opposing side's actions... re-scheduled hearings for weeks or months out at a time... appeals... etc.
    Yes, but the majority of the evidence should be in the product itself....which should be easily obtained by a subpoena. Right? It's not like they have to go witness hunting and gather forensic and DNA evidence and results.

    This just doesn't seem like a case that should take two years. You look at the products spend a few days...maybe a couple of weeks hearing both sides and determining how they operate and what similarities and differences exist between them.....and bada bing bada boom......make a decision.

    Sounds like this case was just blown off and delayed into oblivion.

  11. #11
    dsg
    dsg is offline
    Livin the iPhone Life dsg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,874
    Thanks
    3,683
    Thanked 2,077 Times in 800 Posts

    there are so many gray areas in software and copyright law that could have made it go on longer

  12. #12
    My iPhone is a Part of Me wolverinemarky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    687
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 34 Times in 33 Posts

    Damn I wanted a hackintosh computer I was hoping they would have won. This sucks.

  13. #13
    iPhoneaholic creasy425's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Left Coast
    Posts
    406
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 90 Times in 71 Posts

    the 9th circuit always rules on the sides of major corporations. Thats why its the only circuit the NFL will go to whenever theres a labor dispute and the players try and sue the owners...Psystar should have tried a counter suit with the 8th circuit...

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts