Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
09-29-2011, 02:19 PM #1
Apple Victorious Over Psystar Following Two Year Legal Battle
After two long years in the legal legal system, a definitive victor appears to have been declared in the lengthy battle between Apple and Psystar.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of Apple with Circuit Judge Mary Schroeder ruling that Psystar's Mac clones did, indeed, infringe upon the copyrights held by Apple. Consequently, the already effective ban on sales of Psystar's products will continue.
It was way back in late 2009 when Apple was first awarded a permanent injunction against Psystar by the same court. Ever since, Psystar has been fighting back diligently with appeals and everything in its power to shift legal favor back in its court.
Although many believed Apple's lawsuit would result in a swift slam-dunk for the Cupertino, California-based outfit, Psystar put up a valiant effort and gave Apple a legitimate run for its money. Specifically, Psystar did a laudable job of responding to Apple's lawsuit with a somewhat compelling argument that Apple was "misusing its Mac OS X copyright by requiring customers to only run the software on its own brand of computers."
But alas, Judge Schroeder determined that the court's ruling in favor of Apple was "just." As a result, it now looks as though Psystar is out of options and may soon put up a permanent white flag following this bitter, protracted battle.
09-29-2011, 02:42 PM #2
This took two years?
09-29-2011, 02:55 PM #3
09-29-2011, 03:02 PM #4
09-29-2011, 04:03 PM #5
People get Associates Degrees in two years but a court can't render a decision on ONE straight-forward case for two years?
09-29-2011, 04:10 PM #6
09-29-2011, 04:53 PM #7
Psystar were never going to win, it would have been interesting if they had won though
09-29-2011, 05:21 PM #8
Psystar could just sell the hardware and also sell copies of Mac OS X separately and not preinstalled on their "hackintosh" hardware.
They'd be selling two products and not breaking any laws or EULAs. If the customer wants to install Mac OS X in this hardware that's the customer breaking the EULA and I'd love to see Apple try sue someone for installing software they have bought on hardware the have bought.
09-29-2011, 06:05 PM #9
Really don't see how psystar were going to win. Should of just sold the computer with no software.
09-29-2011, 06:44 PM #10
This just doesn't seem like a case that should take two years. You look at the products spend a few days...maybe a couple of weeks hearing both sides and determining how they operate and what similarities and differences exist between them.....and bada bing bada boom......make a decision.
Sounds like this case was just blown off and delayed into oblivion.
09-29-2011, 08:35 PM #11
there are so many gray areas in software and copyright law that could have made it go on longer
09-29-2011, 09:20 PM #12
Damn I wanted a hackintosh computer I was hoping they would have won. This sucks.
09-29-2011, 09:27 PM #13
the 9th circuit always rules on the sides of major corporations. Thats why its the only circuit the NFL will go to whenever theres a labor dispute and the players try and sue the owners...Psystar should have tried a counter suit with the 8th circuit...