Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
Thread: No Double Dip For Personal Audio in Second Infringement Case Against Apple
is a discussion within theMac News
forums, a part of theGeneral Apple/Mac
section;Personal Audio's second suit against Apple, which was only reported last week, has already been shut down by Judge Ron Clark. Clark in his decision cited the $8 million Personal
...-
07-31-2011, 03:18 PM #1MMi Staff Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 1,342
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 79 Times in 46 Posts
No Double Dip For Personal Audio in Second Infringement Case Against Apple

Personal Audio's second suit against Apple, which was only reported last week, has already been shut down by Judge Ron Clark.
Clark in his decision cited the $8 million Personal Audio received in their first suit against Apple as enough money to cover both complaints. If you remember, Personal Audio's original suit dealt with how a number of older iPods used playlists. The new suit focused on iPhone 4s, iPads, and modern iPods and how they too violated the same patent.
Judge Clark went as far as to deny Personal Audio's request for a second trial. I'm sure Personal Audio will continue to sue any and everything under the sun with the patents they hold, but Judge Clarks swift decision is a nice change of pace compared to the usual snail's pace legal system.
Source: Scribd [via Engadget]
-
07-31-2011, 03:46 PM #2Livin the iPhone Life
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Iowa (ISU for Vet School!)
- Posts
- 3,920
- Thanks
- 69
- Thanked 310 Times in 264 Posts
You mean like Apple?I'm sure Personal Audio will continue to sue any and everything under the sun with the patents they hold
-
The Following User Says Thank You to sziklassy For This Useful Post:
spazturtle (07-31-2011)
-
07-31-2011, 05:47 PM #3
-
07-31-2011, 07:50 PM #4
-
07-31-2011, 08:20 PM #5Livin the iPhone Life
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 1,056
- Thanks
- 4
- Thanked 86 Times in 59 Posts
Sounds like bad strategy by Personal Audio. They probably should have thrown the modern devices in there as well all in one lawsuit and they probably would have gotten more than $8 million.
If anything that judge should have at least ordered Apple to pay royalties to Personal Audio since Apple continues to make products with the same features that violated the patent of Personal Audio.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
