+ Reply
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Already Missing XServe? Active Storage has 'A Solution'

is a discussion within the

Mac News

forums, a part of the

General Apple/Mac

section;
With Apple's intention to discontinue their XServe line in less than 3 days, enterprise professionals who rely on server versions of Mac OS X are scrambling for solutions. Apple has
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    109
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 176 Times in 42 Posts

    Default Already Missing XServe? Active Storage has 'A Solution'


    With Apple's intention to discontinue their XServe line in less than 3 days, enterprise professionals who rely on server versions of Mac OS X are scrambling for solutions. Apple has been redirecting customers towards either their own Mac Mini Server edition or Mac Pro with Snow Leopard Server, but for those who need something beefier than those products, Active Storage may be exactly what they're looking for.

    Active Storage was created by former Apple employees who left the company after Apple decided to no longer offer XServe RAID products. The company's website shows a countdown to the end of XServe on its website, along with a product covered by a cloth, which looks a whole lot like something that might resemble an XServe product. 9 to 5 Mac, discussing Active Storage, said that they've heard the product will "run a webmin variant with Darwin" meaning it will most likely run Snow Leopard Server virtually, which they've heard Apple plans to directly support as they discontinue their own high-end server hardware.

    No screen shots are available at this point, and there's still a bit of mystery behind this potentially valuable product. Apparently Apple has been telling enterprise reps "about this for a few months" stating that this will be "go-to" hardware in the near future.

    It had been recently rumored that Enterprise solutions, both hardware and software-based, were on their way out. However with Active Storage, it seems like Apple's server solutions are not dead at all. Be sure to check Active Storage's website when XServe becomes officially discontinued on February 1st.

    Source:
    9to5Mac
    Active Storage

  2. #2
    iPhoneaholic spazturtle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    321
    Thanks
    115
    Thanked 27 Times in 16 Posts

    Sounds good, I wonder what Apple will have to say. Love to see a powerful server running OS X.

  3. #3
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

    I hope they have Steve's blessings, he'll bury them with attorneys fees if not.

  4. #4
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    172
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts

    Exactly what I was hoping for... Well not totally but if it's virtualized atop Darwin that would be better than nothing. Curiously though what virtualization solutions are supported under Darwin? VMWare possibly? While in many virtualization is the way to go these days as it is generally much more scalable performance and storage wise which makes growing IT resources much more efficient and cost effective. Additionally if you have a "small" need for OS X server; ie a corporation's "creative" department with 20 macs that would preferably utilize native file sharing(AFP), it makes sense to not need to invest in a piece of hardware for that single purpose which could potentially be way under utilized. So I guess this is great for scalability but it would also be nice to see some hardware capable of running os x server on bare metal, assuming apple would license such a product. While many may argue this to be a bad idea and will reference the clones of the mid 90's I see this as an entirely different situation. The Xserve represents such a tiny portion of apple's bottom line that it just makes more sense for them to license their enterprise software to major server manufacturers(IBM, HP, etc.) and strictly control(in good apple fashion of course!) what hardware it is allowed to run on to ensure QC. I don't think it makes sense to kill the software considering the millions they've invested in R&D and the fact that iOS is rapidly penetrating the enterprise setting, quickly encroaching on RIM's market share. It would make sense to continue to support a great piece of server software all while adding some great configuration and deployment software for iOS. The iOS configuration utility is ok but it could use some work, also it'd be great to see encrypted email and messaging services based on open standards(similar to what RIM offers with BBM and encrypted email) And before anyone says anything I know that iOS supports exchange but why not more tightly integrate secure iPhone communication, easy management and quick update/app deployment right into their own server offering. Just my two cents.

  5. #5
    Green Apple Cheesey123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    95
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

    2 cents more like 10 dollars :0)

  6. #6
    Livin the iPhone Life steve-z17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,197
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 141 Times in 121 Posts

    I'm interested to see what the product is, we use xserve at my work and may need to use this.

  7. #7
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    HOUSTON TEXAS
    Posts
    289
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by cheesey123 View Post
    2 cents more like 10 dollars :0)
    lmmfgdao!!!!

  8. #8
    iPhone? More like MyPhone staterunner180's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Hopedale, IL
    Posts
    234
    Thanks
    68
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts

    It would be great if Apple actually let this company officially run OS X Server on their hardware. It could be the first step to opening up OS X to more devices, or at least relaxing their grip on installing it on 3rd party hardware.
    Quote Originally Posted by lolcats1 View Post
    i will pound you mercilessly with my bacon rod until your your eyes pop out.




    Twitter It Up!!

    http://twitter.com/staterunner180

  9. #9
    My iPhone is a Part of Me EskimoRuler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    835
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 48 Times in 44 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by staterunner180 View Post
    It would be great if Apple actually let this company officially run OS X Server on their hardware. It could be the first step to opening up OS X to more devices, or at least relaxing their grip on installing it on 3rd party hardware.
    it would be the least they could do for stopping Xserver
    You don't like the iPad because you don't have one!

  10. #10
    Developing Developer moon#pie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,215
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked 372 Times in 307 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by staterunner180 View Post
    It would be great if Apple actually let this company officially run OS X Server on their hardware. It could be the first step to opening up OS X to more devices, or at least relaxing their grip on installing it on 3rd party hardware.
    That is when it will start resembling windows. what sets OS X apart from others is that it is made specifically for certain hardware, not a 1,000,000 different configurations of hardware.

    That being said, it would be cool if it officially ran OS X server.

    It is basically a high-power linux server with a easy, whoop-*** GUI.


    YouTube - activestoragevideos's Channel
    Last edited by moon#pie; 01-31-2011 at 11:51 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost


    Twitter: @tshoults

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts