+ Reply
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 38

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Apple Sued by Microsoft Co-Founder

is a discussion within the

Mac News

forums, a part of the

General Apple/Mac

section;
Apple is involved in yet another lawsuit. I know. Shocker, isn't it? This time, though, the suit involves another "big boy" in the tech business. According to the Wall Street
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Michael Essany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana
    Posts
    3,778
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 1,480 Times in 566 Posts

    Default Apple Sued by Microsoft Co-Founder



    Apple is involved in yet another lawsuit. I know. Shocker, isn't it?

    This time, though, the suit involves another "big boy" in the tech business. According to the Wall Street Journal, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen is suing Apple (and eleven companies overall) regarding patent infringements. Allen says the likes of Apple and Google are out of line and blatantly violated his patents involving online recommendation algorithms.

    The technology in question was supposedly developed by Allen some ten years ago in a $100 million lab/technology incubator (that no longer exists) called Silicon Valley laboratory Interval Research Corp. It turns out that Allen still holds a number of patents that resulted from the venture. And those are precisely the patents (e-commerce and Internet search-related) that other companies are now allegedly infringing upon.

    "The lab worked on numerous projects, with goals to create technology to use in Mr. Allen's ventures in telecom," the WSJ noted. "In later days it also focused on developing technology to license to others. Over the course of a decade, Interval was issued 300 patents. It successfully marketed some of its patent portfolio, including cellular voice processing technology and motion-detection technology used in games that allows a computer to 'see' commands. It also created a 'smart' toy called 'Red Beard's Pirate Quest' and later sold the technology behind it to Lego Group."

    Along with Apple and Google, other companies named in the suit include AOL, eBay, FaceBook, Netflix, Office Depot, OfficeMax, Staples, Yahoo and YouTube. Microsoft itself, however, is not involved.

    Wall Street Journal

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Michael Essany For This Useful Post:

    danoph83 (08-29-2010), Jrock24 (08-29-2010), reaves205 (08-28-2010)

  3. #2
    iPhone? More like MyPhone maddawg05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    241
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts

    You can't do anything w/o "infringing" in someone's patent.
    Last edited by maddawg05; 08-28-2010 at 03:35 PM. Reason: Soelling

  4. #3
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Every one steals patents, it's not really anything new.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Thev0rtex For This Useful Post:

    pkdarien (08-28-2010)

  6. #4
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    98
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 43 Times in 18 Posts

    Maybe the MMi community should make a whole bunch of patents just to have them, then sue apple ourselves when they "steal" them.

  7. #5
    iPhone? More like MyPhone nautical79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Baja Mexico
    Posts
    124
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    messany can you be more especific on the subjet,what pattent is apple using exactly.
    Common Sense Its Not So Common

  8. #6
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    121
    Thanks
    81
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by ownerofspam View Post
    Maybe the MMi community should make a whole bunch of patents just to have them, then sue apple ourselves when they "steal" them.
    You moron, you can't just say I CREATED SOMETHING ITS MINE, NO ONE CAN STEAL IT!!!!
    you have to fill out tons of forms, go to the government, pay them, then it MIGHT be patented, but it can be denied.
    MMi LIVES on apple, what the hell is the point of suing them?

  9. #7
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    32
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Shishir G View Post
    You moron, you can't just say I CREATED SOMETHING ITS MINE, NO ONE CAN STEAL IT!!!!
    you have to fill out tons of forms, go to the government, pay them, then it MIGHT be patented, but it can be denied.
    MMi LIVES on apple, what the hell is the point of suing them?
    Dude. Learn to take a joke.

  10. #8
    My iPhone is a Part of Me primalscream.40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    grenada,ms
    Posts
    785
    Thanks
    666
    Thanked 642 Times in 360 Posts

    That's what's wrong with the world this day an time. Everybody sues over stupid crap

  11. #9
    Green Apple Markanthony3211's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    64
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    This is why companies can't evolve, if your not going to do anything with the Patent then someone else will! *Sheesh!*
    "The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear"

    'Follow Me on Twitter@Markanthony3211' I always Follow Back.

  12. #10
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    147
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Well, from a patenter standpoint, it sucks. I mean, let's say you fricking create the cure to cancer. With this, you patent it so that only you can sell it, as you were the one who put all your life's work into it. After you put it out, make some profits, another company starts selling the cure too, at which point, you're p.o'd, because all he did was copy your idea and he's making huge profits because he's probably selling it at a lower price. It mostly just takes away all the hard work you did. Same with the co-founder guy, I guess, working in a 100 million dollar lab for years developing ****, then having people just take it later on without any permission. I tend to take patents pretty seriously at times, since it really does suck for the person who patents things.

  13. #11
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    139
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 63 Times in 35 Posts

    I doubt Paul Allen ever did anything first, he's always rode on someone else's successes.

  14. #12
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Posts
    245
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 69 Times in 35 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dguymwm View Post
    I doubt Paul Allen ever did anything first, he's always rode on someone else's successes.
    Do you even know who Paul Allen is? He is just as much responsible for Microsoft as Bill Gates is, Bill Gates is just much much much more public. It could be argued that without Paul Allen we wouldn't be posting on this forum at all.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Luppin For This Useful Post:

    Tamkis (09-04-2010)

  16. #13
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    452
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts

    Paul better watch out. I'm pretty sure Apple patented suing lol.

  17. #14
    Green Apple gafu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    S.Jersey
    Posts
    79
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 27 Times in 14 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by yahoowizard View Post
    Well, from a patenter standpoint, it sucks. I mean, let's say you fricking create the cure to cancer. With this, you patent it so that only you can sell it, as you were the one who put all your life's work into it. After you put it out, make some profits, another company starts selling the cure too, at which point, you're p.o'd, because all he did was copy your idea and he's making huge profits because he's probably selling it at a lower price. It mostly just takes away all the hard work you did. Same with the co-founder guy, I guess, working in a 100 million dollar lab for years developing ****, then having people just take it later on without any permission. I tend to take patents pretty seriously at times, since it really does suck for the person who patents things.
    If I created a cure for cancer,it'd be free....there's no price on life

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to gafu For This Useful Post:

    taz1981m (08-28-2010)

  19. #15
    iPhoneaholic reanimationxp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    355
    Thanks
    313
    Thanked 62 Times in 39 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by gafu View Post
    If I created a cure for cancer,it'd be free....there's no price on life
    Yea and if you told anyone about it you'd be snuffed and it'd be hidden away in a vault somewhere.
    Anybody want a 32GB Mint Condition Black JB Unlocked 3GS? PM me with offers.

  20. #16
    My iPhone is a Part of Me hitman10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    I live in a house
    Posts
    505
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 44 Times in 28 Posts

    Thank you Sir Fredrick Banting and Charles Herbert Best for putting no price on life, other wise I wouldn't be here.

    Fish are friends, not food!
    Neither is Slow Internet.

  21. #17
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,139
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Time for Apple to get a taste of its own medicine, finally someone big enough to see things through.

  22. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Right behind you!!
    Posts
    163
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by unison999 View Post
    Time for Apple to get a taste of its own medicine, finally someone big enough to see things through.
    And AOL, eBay, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Office Depot, OfficeMax, Staples, Yahoo, and YouTube and Microsoft, oh wait, they're not on the list of companies being sued. Hmmm. Wouldn't he make more money from suing Microsoft? Microsoft are the champions of stealing code, but this time doesn't count does it? Why aren't they being sued too? Just typical of microsuck to get others to do their dirty work. You can read a response from facebook here. http://www.techflash.com/mobile/seat...l_patents.html

    M$ must be worried they're not getting any attention. When google chrome os comes out, they will suffer. Good.

    Quote Originally Posted by nautical79 View Post
    messany can you be more especific on the subjet,what pattent is apple using exactly.
    The suit alleges that the companies violate a patent for a “Browser for use in navigating a body of information, with particular application to browsing information represented by audiovisual data” .

    I believe this is a pretty broad range of uses inside a browser. Funny that companies sue even though the patients have been infringed for years but they go to court when they're financially challenged.
    Last edited by Tyronal; 08-28-2010 at 07:48 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  23. #19
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    487
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 39 Times in 31 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by zozodouce View Post
    Paul better watch out. I'm pretty sure Apple patented suing lol.
    haha zing!!

    Couple things to address. If Allen holds the patents then he gets to sue. Example: If you thought of the idea first, then you should have patented it before he did.

    That being said, I side with Allen on this one as I would definitely wait for the infringing companies to make a lot of money first before suing. The whole point of suing is to make money on the deal unless he was actually going for an injunction to stop them from providing the software any more. He isn't doing that because a judge likely won't bar them from using the software but will very likely award a small fortune to Allen since he holds the patents.

    We already know why he isn't suing his alma mater, Microsoft. It is a given that you sue the company that made you most of your money. Furthermore, I wouldn't be surprised if he still gets kickbacks, royalties, or whatever you call it from Microsoft aside from the money he also makes when his Microsoft stock goes up. They are his patents and he has the right to sue whomever he wants which brings me to my next point on another company he is not suing even though he never worked for them, they don't pay him, and they are still essentially infringing on his patents.

    The next point. Notice that Mozilla(creator of Firefox, Thunderbird, etc. for those of you that weren't aware) is NOT on the list. The owner of Mozilla Corporation(a for-profit organization) is Mozilla Foundation(a non-profit organization). It has been speculated that because Mozilla generally is a non-profit organization that Allen chooses not to pursue litigation against them for this reason.

    So there is something to chew on guys. Allen did the leg work and got the patents therefore he gets the spoils. It is the law and you don't have to like it but you have to abide by it.
    Last edited by alexevo; 08-28-2010 at 08:47 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  24. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Right behind you!!
    Posts
    163
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by alexevo View Post
    haha zing!!

    Couple things to address. If Allen holds the patents then he gets to sue. Example: If you thought of the idea first, then you should have patented it before he did.

    That being said, I side with Allen on this one as I would definitely wait for the infringing companies to make a lot of money first before suing. The whole point of suing is to make money on the deal unless he was actually going for an injunction to stop them from providing the software any more. He isn't doing that because a judge likely won't bar them from using the software but will very likely award a small fortune to Allen since he holds the patents.

    We already know why he isn't suing his alma mater, Microsoft. It is a given that you sue the company that made you most of your money. Furthermore, I wouldn't be surprised if he still gets kickbacks, royalties, or whatever you call it from Microsoft aside from the money he also makes when his Microsoft stock goes up. They are his patents and he has the right to sue whomever he wants which brings me to my next point on another company he is not suing even though he never worked for them, they don't pay him, and they are still essentially infringing on his patents.

    The next point. Notice that Mozilla(creator of Firefox, Thunderbird, etc. for those of you that weren't aware) is NOT on the list. The owner of Mozilla Corporation(a for-profit organization) is Mozilla Foundation(a non-profit organization). It has been speculated that because Mozilla generally is a non-profit organization that Allen chooses not to pursue litigation against them for this reason.

    So there is something to chew on guys. Allen did the leg work and got the patents therefore he gets the spoils. It is the law and you don't have to like it but you have to abide by it.
    These patient suits are stupid. Someone has an idea, files a patent but never implements it. This kind of games play will see innovation grind to a halt, and if every idea was shelved waiting for someone to sue for picking it up, the IT world will go into a coma. Interval Research had no idea how to build a commercial product and no intention to build a commercial product. It was simply a vehicle to create paper, unimplementable patents. Those who have the ability to implement it, do, then get sued. If they didn't, then we wouldn't get the benefit of using them. The law should be, you have an idea, patent it with express rules that it needs to be implemented within 5 years of patient. Otherwise innovation will be controlled by lawyers. "The first thing we do, is kill all the lawyers." (Shakespeare's Henry VI)
    Last edited by Tyronal; 08-28-2010 at 09:18 PM.

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts