Results 1 to 17 of 17

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Analyst Keeps Insisting That Apple Get Into TV

  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Paul Daniel Ash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Union Square, Somerville, Mass.
    Posts
    919
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 995 Times in 401 Posts

    Default Analyst Keeps Insisting That Apple Get Into TV


    You have to say this guy is consistent.

    Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster has been telling pretty much anybody who will listen that Apple is going to make its own TV and it's going to be awesome. Back in the middle of last year, he was touting an upgraded Apple TV that would have its own App Store for games and movies. Then, when that product did not appear, he began talking about a new model of Internet-based subscription TV, pretty much the same idea that Apple has apparently epically FAILed to put together because it can't get licensing arrangements with the major studios. But Munster is still at it, telling his clients today that Apple is two to four years away from an internet-connected HDTV.

    Any doubt about Apple's future in television could pretty well have been laid to rest by Apple COO Tim Cook, Steve Jobs's second-in-command and almost certainly the man who will be next chief executive of Apple. Cook called Apple TV "a hobby," and flatly stated that "we have no interest in being in the TV market" because "the go-to-market model is difficult." So with a record of failure, and those simple arguments against the idea, why is Munster still so gung-ho about the prospect of Apple selling TVs?

    One simple answer: money. Big, big piles of it.

    As Munster told his clients, "home entertainment is a $31.8 (billion) market in the US and the company has a history of succeeding by redefining mature markets." Apple would use its Jobsy magic to redefine the extremely mature US television market by introducing something called the "connected-HDTV:" a high-definition television set with broadband access and a simple user interface. The killer app that would drive the new product to success would be the elusive iTunes TV Pass, which Munster says would offer unlimited access to live and recorded programming and would be available for from $50 to $90 per month.

    So what's stopping Apple from mopping up all this cash? Munster defines the "Primary Hurdle" as being the "MSOs" or Multiple Systems Operators - such as Time Warner Cable, Cablevision, Comcast and Cox Communications in the US, Rogers Communications, Videotron and Shaw Communications in Canada or Virgin Media in the UK - that provide huge revenue streams to the TV and movie studios. The majors have been brushing off Apple's overtures to avoid killing the goose that lays so many golden eggs, but Munster thinks that Apple's "125 (million) addressable iTunes accounts" might be enough to move the content providers away from the MSOs.

    It's still fantasyland stuff, but Munster believes that the 74 million iPhones and iPod touches - along with the unknown millions of iPads about to hit the streets - will be too tempting of a potential market for the studios to walk away from. And he notes COO Tim Cook's statement that the company is continuing to invest in Apple TV because "we fundamentally believe there is something there for us in the future."

  2. #2
    ummmmmmmmm, alrightly then

  3. #3
    iPhone? More like MyPhone ForumSnoBorderRK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    southern california
    Posts
    248
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 42 Times in 22 Posts

    some analysts are truly dumb. like the group you mentioned in the last post.
    Apple wouldnt even be ready for TV's yet. Look at how many problems their LED backlit 27" iMac's had. Haha, I am an owner so I had my share of problems. Munster has mentioned good things in the past though.
    -[r]
    if you can, please [thank] me if i helped you or you liked what i said! :]

  4. #4
    My iPhone is a Part of Me Rob2G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    San Luis Obispo, CA
    Posts
    604
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 145 Times in 75 Posts

    Default I would buy it
    Im not gonna lie I would buy it. I know it would be over priced and have stupid limitations but Apple has a spell on me.

  5. #5
    anything that brings Apple money, they will do

  6. #6
    Default AppleTV, not Apple TV's
    People, Apple is not going to make an actually television set at this time. The LED and LCDs Apple uses are made by Sharp, LG, and Toshiba.
    If I helped you, hit the button or be Banned!

    Download Macbook 3.1 for Winterboard-Now LIVE on Cydia-Macbook Final, Macbook Final Widget,Macbook SBSettings
    Need Hardware Repair Support?: PM ME

  7. #7
    Previously Known as A.T MetallicaFan1991's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    1,582
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked 111 Times in 94 Posts

    Hmm. I'll stick with my Sony Bravia.

  8. #8
    those new sharp quatra led/lcd look great. i think im buying a new samsung led/lcd though instead of the iPAd. anyways like melech said, if apple were to get into the buisness it would be sharp lg or toshiba that would be making it.
    killall Terminal[]

  9. #9
    i think apple sould do this and make it like each chanel is its own app and u subscribe to only the channels u want for a monthly fee or u can subscribe to packaged apps for a better deal, or something like that

  10. #10
    IPS panels wouldn't work good for a tv... they look pretty, but they are sloooow.

  11. #11
    Man I love the Apple TV I dunno why they don't just upgrade that with more storage and processing power (and jailbreaking capabilities of course ).

  12. #12
    Apple doesn't believe in buttons so the remote would probably be blank or maybe just have a small home button haha

  13. #13
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dearborn Heights, Michigan, United States
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
    I would never buy into it, only products I like from apple are iPods and iPhones... everything else is out of wack and overpriced pos.... hahaha.... sorry, please no hate mail guys....

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by TranceField View Post
    I would never buy into it, only products I like from apple are iPods and iPhones... everything else is out of wack and overpriced pos.... hahaha.... sorry, please no hate mail guys....
    HAHA I agree. As for the tv, I'd rather stick to my SONY....

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to punjabi212 For This Useful Post:

    TranceField (03-24-2010)

  16. #15
    Maybe it is just me but the last TV I purchased was over four years ago. Am I wrong in thinking that a majority of consumers are not interested in purchasing a high end TV every one to two years which is what Apple has based their business on with macbooks, monitors, iPods/iPhones etc.
    "To unpathed waters, undreamed shores." -- William Shakespeare

  17. #16
    Green Apple ceris7356's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    48
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
    Knowing Apple, it probably would cost a ridiculous amount of money, but I must admit its seems quite bad ***. My faith in the quality of Apple's products would lead me to buy this. But alas, I don't really see this happening.

  18. #17
    Default seo tools
    Amazing content!
    Thank you for this share!
    seo

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •