-
12-01-2009, 05:13 PM #21
-
12-01-2009, 06:34 PM #22Livin the iPhone Life
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Utah
- Posts
- 1,632
- Thanks
- 84
- Thanked 104 Times in 90 Posts
-
12-02-2009, 06:06 AM #23MMi's "X" Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Dragonspiral Tower in 3DS
- Posts
- 4,526
- Thanks
- 114
- Thanked 346 Times in 258 Posts
Doesn't look like you have to get a Mac for Snow Leopard. Glad I can get this one cheaper.
Asking for help is different from being stupid. Fanboys can rot in @#$%!
-
12-02-2009, 07:39 AM #24What's Jailbreak?
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Miami, FL
- Posts
- 15
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I recently found out that my friends uncle turns out to be the owner of Psystar. From what my friend has said, his uncle is just now moving to California (atleast temporarily) because of the legal battle. Its not over yet!
-
12-04-2009, 06:07 PM #25
For the sake of argument, you're comparing embeded systems to full fledged desktop OS'es. In the realm of full fledged desktop computers, I can't think of any other OS that's completely limited to just one particular set of hardware. The closest thing that comes to mind is Sun's Solaris OS but I do believe it can be installed any other hardware. I agree Apple is providing a complete package but perhaps expanding the bounds of where OS X can be installed might help Apple gain more market share?
As for support, I would think for any hardware not vended by Apple, the responsiblity for drivers would fall on whoever made the hardware, would it not, so where's the problem? Is this how it's been for PC's, whether it's Windows or Linux or any other x86 compatible OS.Last edited by szr; 12-04-2009 at 06:20 PM.
-
12-05-2009, 08:47 AM #26
In their defense, one huge advantage for Apple and consumer is that there is a much higher level of reliability for Apple and a better experience for the consumer. One of the things that has really hurt MS over the years is a lack of control on the installed platform and dealing with the ensuing interoperability issues that arise because of this.
That's about the only slack I'll cut MS since I still think that they have [up to 7 since I haven't used it yet] ***** operating systems/environments.
If Apple had to support every HW producer that didn't adequately follow their reference designs, you'd see a lot more 'bluescreens' and stability issues that you do currently. My main systems that I rely on for my livelihood will be Apple-made. But I still would like a couple of cheap platforms to use around the house or travel with.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

