+ Reply
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Apple Terminates ZFS Open Source Project

is a discussion within the

Mac News

forums, a part of the

General Apple/Mac

section;
In what came as a surprise to many, official word was issued last night confirming the end of Apple's ZFS open source project - an advanced file system developed by
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Michael Essany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana
    Posts
    3,721
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 1,479 Times in 565 Posts

    Default Apple Terminates ZFS Open Source Project


    In what came as a surprise to many, official word was issued last night confirming the end of Apple's ZFS open source project - an advanced file system developed by Sun that was ported to Mac OS X and released as an open source project on Apple's Mac OS Forge collaboration site two years ago.

    Apple Insider reports that the mailing list and repository will also be removed shortly.

    Mac OS Forge describes itself as "dedicated to supporting the developer community surrounding open source components specific to Mac OS X." It publishes source code and an information repository about a variety of open projects Apple funds and maintains, including: Darwin Calendar Server (used in iCal Server); Darwin Streaming Server (used in QuickTime Streaming Server); libdispatch (used in Grand Central Dispatch); WebKit (Used in Safari); XQuartz (used in Apple's X11 offering); and until recently, ZFS.
    The obvious question, of course, is why did Apple cut off the project. Unfortunately, the answer isn't entirely clear, although it is believed that legal rather than engineering issues proved the ultimate catalyst for the decision. For example, ZFS is currently involved with a lawsuit filed by NetApp against Sun.

    It's also been thought that ZFS just isn't a good fit for Apple's average customer. ZFS, after all, is customized to manage sizable numbers of disks. Since the usual Apple-fanatic only has a system with one hard disk or SSD drive, ZFS's features would largely been rendered useless or, at the very least, under-utilized.

    Apple's interest in porting ZFS was first signaled in early 2006 when it contacted Sun's OpenSolaris project; By August 2007 an early, read-only port of ZFS was published on Mac OS Forge and command line support was added to Mac OS X Leopard. Comments by Sun executives had tipped of wild speculation that ZFS would become the default file system of Mac OS X, and pundits pounced upon the idea that Apple's own technology was terrible and that anything it could replace with from outside sources would solve lots of problems for end users.
    Looking back, the writing may have been on the wall for this eventuality when rumors proved false about ZFS support in Snow Leopard. For the time being, however, it is thought that Apple is at work on developing its own alternative for use in future revisions of OS X. Nothing has been formally announced but a "file system engineer" has been listed in Apple's recent job listings.

    Image via TechGuru

  2. #2
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default .
    Interesting

  3. #3
    The King Melech518's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    4,704
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 1,140 Times in 586 Posts

    Why do you use that same picture for every article pertaining to apple?? I have seen it at least 3 times in the past month...
    Last edited by Melech518; 10-24-2009 at 12:40 PM.
    If I helped you, hit the button or be Banned!

    Download Macbook 3.1 for Winterboard-Now LIVE on Cydia-Macbook Final, Macbook Final Widget,Macbook SBSettings
    Need Hardware Repair Support?: PM ME

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Melech518 For This Useful Post:

    mk12 (10-25-2009)

  5. #4
    MMi's "X" Member awesomeSlayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Dragonspiral Tower in 3DS
    Posts
    4,524
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 347 Times in 259 Posts

    Is this a good decision? For the future for customers?
    Asking for help is different from being stupid. Fanboys can rot in @#$%!

  6. #5
    Previously Known as A.T MetallicaFan1991's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    1,582
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked 111 Times in 94 Posts

    Read the words "Apple", "Terminates" and "Open Source", thought f**k Apple, really are being douchebags this year.

    And no I don't understand this article.

    MBP 15" 2.66Ghz Core 2 Duo Nvidia 9400M 9600GT 256MB OS X 10.6.4 Windows 7 June 2009
    iPhone 4 August 28th

  7. #6
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    353
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by A.T View Post
    Read the words "Apple", "Terminates" and "Open Source", thought f**k Apple, really are being douchebags this year.

    And no I don't understand this article.
    Apple wisely decided to go with ZFS rather than build a new one from scratch. Sun then basically tried to extort money from Apple on licensing fees. Also, with the eminent takeover of Sun by Oracle it was unclear if it was in Apple's best interest to continue with ZFS. Simple as that... sort of... Anyway, it's as if a friend of yours has a $5 baseball card you want to buy from him and he charges you $500 instead.

    Probably (speculation here), Sun was desperate for cash and decided that Apple had deep enough pockets to fork over the cash.

    As for the average consumer, ZFS would have been of no consequence really. This is mostly a need of the server community.
    Last edited by imode; 10-25-2009 at 04:01 PM.

  8. #7
    Livin the iPhone Life rhekt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,294
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 65 Times in 53 Posts

    oh man?!!! really?
    killall Terminal[]

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts