[Krazedkid1221]

Which do you prefer. I prefer the video. I want more bang for my buck, but I know some people like the smallest they can get. Also the price factor.

[chbearsrock]

Well I have to say nano hands down. I only have about 5/6gbs of music on my computer and generally when I add a few tracks I delete a few as well. The nano can play videos too, but neither the video nor the nano have screens large enough for me to enjoyably watch a clip longer than a few minutes. I actually believe the video should just be eliminated from the line all together. The Touch can do everything the ipod video can, but with a larger screen, touch interface, and the power/capabilities of a mobile computer. It's only a matter of time until the Touch drops in price and the Video is eliminated all together.

[MacGal]

Nano. I'm more interested in hearing my songs, than video...

[NatashaP]

Me too! I play much more music than videos even though I like movies.

[waldoctg]

Nano. I have a video, and it just gets annoying have to take care of the mirror back and like they size is annoying 2

[Lolski]

Nano without a shadow of a doubt