Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
iPhone Newsforums, a part of the
01-08-2014, 11:10 PM #1
FCC May Intervene Over AT&T's Sponsored Data Program Due to Anticompetitive Nature
AT&T which was likely hoping its new Sponsored Data plan would capture the attention of cost-conscious consumers has instead caught the eye of the FCC chairman Tom Wheeler. Speaking at CES 2014, Wheeler said he would look closely at AT&Tís new program that promises to give consumers access to free data in exchange for using the sponsorís services or apps. The sponsoring company would then cover the costs of the data used by these customers. He had the following to say regarding the matter:
My attitude is: letís take a look at what this is, letís take a look at how it operates. And be sure, that if it interferes with the operation of the internet; that if it develops into an anticompetitive practice; that if it does have some kind of preferential treatment given somewhere, then that is cause for us to intervene.
How do you feel about the Sponsored Data program and its potential anticompetitive nature?
Source: The Verge
01-09-2014, 12:33 AM #2
I think that one way or another, you'll still be coming out of pocket...
01-09-2014, 12:53 AM #3
01-09-2014, 06:14 AM #4
01-09-2014, 06:45 AM #5
AT&T's policies here are evil.
Just like they do with tethering ("Here's 2.5GB of data... but if you use it THIS way, you have to pay an extra $20") they're now trying to create another additional revenue stream based on something they don't provide anymore - unlimited data. "Hey, we're not going to offer unlimited data anymore, but if Facebook's willing to front the bill, we'll offer you unlimited Facebook." And then they have a customer paying for data service on one end, and Facebook paying to offer a "feature" on the other end.
It's anti-competitive on its face. Let's say you have App A and App B. App A is technically better, but App B is backed by a big company or some form of big money. App A is wildly popular, but causes a whole bunch of AT&T customers to get data overage charges. App B pays AT&T and advertises "hey, we do the same thing, but we're free on AT&T" and let's say that Verizon jumps on the bandwagon too. Now you have a situation where a technically better, more popular app is threatened not by a better idea, but by economics of an internet that's no longer an even playing field, but rather becomes an environment of virtual class warfare. It's incredibly anti-competitive and anti-innovation.
Meanwhile, you have carriers like T-Mobile and Sprint that simply offer unlimited data no matter the sender or receiver. If AT&T turns this into a revenue stream, what will those providers do? Assuming they jumped on the bandwagon of content providers funding bandwidth, the only thing they'd have to offer (since they already provide unlimited to customers) would be preferential Quality of Service (i.e. someone trying to access Facebook, for instance, has higher priority to airwaves and bandwidth than someone trying to access a smaller business website). So, back to the above scenario - App A has to compete with the fact that App B is free on all networks and has better data QoS on some networks, while App A can't afford to buy the freedom & QoS. The carriers essentially help App B to snuff out App A.
Essentially, to sum this up... this may be the beginning of the end for net neutrality if the FCC doesn't put a stop to this before it begins.
01-09-2014, 06:51 AM #6
AT&T has been trying to do this for decades. Back when dial up came out, there was a potential for 50mbps over dialup, the phone companies didn't want the end user to have access to that service unless companies paid more to have their service on the higher speed and if you didn't pay, you'd be on the lower dialup speed. It's clear that AT&T doesn't believe in net neutrality. This current attempt would no doubt lead back to that again.
01-09-2014, 08:19 AM #7
Well, I have three upgrade-eligible grandfathered Unlimited AT&T line on a family plan and I can get a lot more by selling those lines.
01-09-2014, 09:17 AM #8
We are way behind in speed for the cost wake up people. Take no crap demand better service for the price we all pay.
More money for less stuff that people don't really use.
01-09-2014, 09:23 AM #9
01-09-2014, 09:36 AM #10
01-09-2014, 10:51 AM #11
01-09-2014, 02:46 PM #12
If this is allowed to continue it'll be the death knell of net neutrality. Hopefully the FCC keeps a close eye on them and Verizon. If I had T-Mobile or Sprint in my area I'd jump to them in a heartbeat.
01-10-2014, 06:20 AM #13
You cant vote right-wing then complain about this stuff! its hilarious to watch.
There contention has and will always be;
- This is America, "dog eat dog" capitalism Rules!
- AT&T is a private company that spends Billions on spectrum and network build outs, they have to recoup those dollars
- Start-ups that can't afford sponsored data? To bad! Not all of us can afford to go to Nobu or Spago
- Don't like the rates? Go to T-mobile or Sprint and enjoy lower overall network quality
- Want "equity" and socialism? Move to another country that supports it.
- Luckily Obama's FCC/DOJ saved T-Mobile or AT&T would've gobbled it (Prez McCain or Romney? T-Mo would be ghost!)
If all of that (except the last item) seems heartless and makes you angry then why continue to vote right-wing?
Bottom-line; ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES! Now lets clean up that House. Sayin...
Last edited by Lohand; 01-10-2014 at 06:23 AM.
01-10-2014, 06:53 AM #14
I just don't think that businesses that have endured and grown and prospered over decades should be penalized because Joe Schmo down the street with his "start up" hasn't worked hard enough and long enough to compete on the same playing field.