Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
iPhone Newsforums, a part of the
09-18-2013, 01:19 AM #1
White House Petitions FCC to Make Cell Phone Unlocking Legal
The Obama administration has recently filed a petition with the Federal Communications Commission asking that all wireless carriers be required to unlock all mobile devices according to The Washington Post. The move comes several months after The White House backed a “We the People” petition that successfully garnered more than 100,000 signatures calling for cell phone unlocking to be made legal.
The “We the People” petition was started after an October ruling by the Library of Congress Copyright Office which ended an exemption within the Digital Millennium Copyright Act which formerly allowed cell phone unlocking. As of January 26, 2013 it became illegal for US mobile phone users to unlock newly purchased cell phones without express permission from their cell phone carriers. According to the recent petition from The White House’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration, permitting unlocked devices, including both smartphones and tablets, would increase both competition and consumer choice. The following was mentioned regarding the matter:
"Americans should be able to use their mobile devices on whatever networks they choose and have their devices unlocked without hassle," said Lawrence Strickling, assistant secretary of the NTIA.
Source: The Washington Post
09-18-2013, 01:52 AM #2
Didn't the White House say unlocking was illegal last year?
They really need to stop smoking so much dope and remember what they did and said last year.
The Following User Says Thank You to smith01 For This Useful Post:
09-18-2013, 02:09 AM #3
They need to make companies allow you to run whatever firmware or software you choose on your own device. I can run any version of Windows I choose on my PC but am forced to upgrade my phone if it needs restoring? What difference does it make to apple what iOS version I choose to run? Certain apps work better on older firmwares or were never optimized for the newer version.
09-18-2013, 02:48 AM #4
09-18-2013, 02:56 AM #5
I wish someone would explain this to me. Why does anyone in their right mind think that they have a legal right to unlock a phone while it is under contract. AT&T foots a large portion of the price of your device under the agreement that you will pay your bill with them for the next 2 years. If it was legal to just get the phone for $200 and them immediately stop paying your bill and go to a cheap carrier don't you think that AT&T would be losing loads of money? The way I see it, you do not own that phone entirely until you have completed your contract at which point AT&T will unlock it for you. Until then you are locked in for the carriers protection. I would certainly argue that you shouldn't have request it to be unlock when your contract is over. They should just do it as soon as your contract expires but come on people you have to use common sense here. It would be like you buy a car from Ford with a small down payment and an agreed upon payment plan but then you deciding you would rather pay Chevy the monthly payments.
The Following User Says Thank You to zerocool5878 For This Useful Post:
09-18-2013, 03:17 AM #6
And what you say is fair comment, but regardless of whether the carrier unlocked or didn't at the start of the contract, you'd still be liable to pay it in full because your carrier contract is a credit agreement that if you break, you'll get credit blacklisted for.
And if you're in the UK, you're better off getting a bankloan for the device - leaving you free to select your carrier of choice.
09-18-2013, 03:22 AM #7
They can have my jailbreak when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
09-18-2013, 03:47 AM #8
09-18-2013, 03:49 AM #9
09-18-2013, 05:14 AM #10
09-18-2013, 05:15 AM #11
You are ob Obviously not understanding the issue. Only because you are able to unlock your phone, doesn't mean that you are relieved of your contract. The point of unlocking a phone, is another. Let's say you are abroad, why would you have to use your US provider And pay outrageous roaming fees, rather than using a local provider? Even if all phones came unlocked when you purchase them with a contract, your contract is still legally binding. The provider loses nothing.
09-18-2013, 05:42 AM #12
Once i Sign the contract I own the phone. If i cancel my contract i don't give the phone back, I pay a cancellation fee. I feel the same about having to update the firmware..should be able to run whatever release you choose.
09-18-2013, 07:27 AM #13
This is why I'm on Straight Talk. Even after paying the hefty price for the Straight Talk iPhone 5, I'm still saving almost $1000 a year. ~$37/mo
09-18-2013, 07:44 AM #14
09-18-2013, 08:28 AM #15
I have unlocked several iPhones after the contract is over. I even had someone contact me that I sold my 3Gs to years ago who was trying to unlock it officially (was done with ultrasn0w when I sold it). AT&T asked me for the original sales receipt which I told them I didn't have and they still unlocked it for that person. AT&T makes it very easy to unlock the phone once the contract is over.
If you travel abroad a lot then you should just buy the unlocked device off contract. AT&T DOES have every right to not allow you to unlock the phone while on contract... it's kind of like a rent to own situation.
09-18-2013, 08:41 AM #16
I will give this another few months and unlocking will be legal. As for people who think we have rights or apple has rights or AT&T has rights, go to a forum where people care about that. I think apple has some good ones. This forum is for people with open minds. Mod Mi I. And that's what I want to do.
09-18-2013, 09:16 AM #17
Also, people go and say "Well, I can run whatever I want on my PC, why can't I on my phone?,"
Well... is there a law stating that you can run any OS you so choose on your PC? No, it's the choice of the people who manufacture your computers. So, if a company chooses to lock a PC's OS to Windows and you're not allowed to run something like Linux, do you go and buy that computer? I would hope not. You may like everything else about the computer. It's cheap, it's fast, it's got an insane battery life, but that doesn't mean the government should swoop in and change it for you just because you don't like that one bit. It should be the companies you petition and persuade, not the government.
I know people far and wide will disagree and call me an a**hole and everything else, but meh. What else is new? People disagree and that's okay. I just wish they didn't have to be so violent about it. This is my opinion, I'm not forcing it on anyone. No one should be able to force their opinion on anyone else.
Last edited by Quade321; 09-18-2013 at 09:30 AM.
09-18-2013, 10:28 AM #18
If you don't like the rules then pay full price! Simple jeez stop whining already. A government shouldn't be able to tell a company how to run their business. They should be worried about other ****.
The Following User Says Thank You to Feanor64 For This Useful Post:
09-18-2013, 10:54 AM #19
O2 in the UK used to supply all their contract phones unlocked - until they became the sole carrier of the iPhone for two years.
09-18-2013, 12:42 PM #20