Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
iPhone Newsforums, a part of the
08-28-2013, 10:58 PM #1
Samsung Confirms Galaxy Gear Smart Watch Debut at a September 4 Event in Germany
Samsung has confirmed that it will be unveiling a new wearable device dubbed the Galaxy Gear at a media event in Germany next week. The launch will represent the company’s latest stab at a smart watch, which is a move that many tech giants seem to be working on. The company recently revealed to The Korea Times that its forthcoming Galaxy Gear will be a smart watch with a non-flexible display. Lee Young-hee, executive vice president of Samsung’s mobile business, referred to the accessory as a “concept device,” suggesting that it may not be ready for the mass market.” According to him:
The new device will enhance and enrich the current smart mobile experience in many ways. It will lead a new trend in smart mobile communications. We are confident that the Gear will add meaningful momentum to the mobile industry.
According to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filing which described the Galaxy Gear, it was defined as the following:
…wearable electronic devices in the form of a wristwatch, wrist band or bangle capable of providing access to the Internet and for sending and receiving phone calls, electronic mails and messages.
Apple also ended up filing its own patent application for a wrist-watch device and is currently seeking trademark rights for the “iWatch” name in a number of countries. There even appear to be several reports about the product which continue to float around regularly. We’ll have to wait and see how the competition turns out on what appears to be the next big tech trend, smart watches.
Source: AmongTech, The Korea Times
08-29-2013, 12:41 AM #2
Samsung has been a tendency of copying the Apple made products .. first it has copied the concept of iPad/Pod and now is copying iWatch.. have they nothing genuine to thing for and made upon ?
08-29-2013, 02:18 AM #3
How can they copy something that no one out side of apple has seen and isn't even confirmed yet?
And why pick on Samsung when a lot of other manufactures are also planning smart watches?
08-29-2013, 05:40 AM #4
Its the "next big thing" supposedly. I guess G-Shocks have lost their luster. Time for a new overpriced arm accessory. Still awaiting the list of capabilities for the iWatch. Im sure in the end it will be the watch of choice.
08-29-2013, 05:52 AM #5
Why anyone would want to buy a smart watch with a battery life of 10 hours is beyond me. Regardless who it's made by.
If the battery life of these watches is gonna be less than 24 hours then there's seriously no point to them.
08-29-2013, 07:22 AM #6
08-29-2013, 08:01 AM #7
battery shud be at least a week..... watch with battery less den half day is CRAP!!!
08-29-2013, 08:16 AM #8
Samsung may copy Apple at times, but to the poster who claims this copies the iWatch: THERE IS NO iWatch !
Get over yourself. Geeze!
As for the claims: I would hope Samsung realizes that a watch needs to last longer than half a day. It needs to (at least) make it through a weekend away from power outlets. These smartwatches are competing against multiple product categories (sports watches, traditional watches, and smart accessories / wearable peripherals) while trying to revive a dying category (the wrist watch). Both sport watches (tomtom/nike, garmin, polar, etc.) and wrist watches last for weeks, not hours or days. Heck, even the Pebble (the only real competitor in the smartwatch space currently) has a 7 day battery life. If the specs are correct then the camera needs to go and the screen has to be shrunk down in order to reduce power consumption.
Personally, I'm not fan of wearing a watch. I stopped wearing a watch back in middle school. It wasn't until I became a nurse that I had to start wearing a watch again. If I have to wear a watch I might as we'll be wearing a smartwatch. I really hope things heat up in this space and these companies can deliver awesome features at competitive prices. And assist of you should know (though fanboys tend to forget) competition in the marketplace is always a good thing!They can have my jailbreak when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
The Following User Says Thank You to politicalslug For This Useful Post:
08-29-2013, 02:37 PM #9
As a server, student, and just a sociable person, there is definitely a market for this type of device. It's much more discrete to look at your wrist every time a notification on your phone goes off than to remove the phone out of the pocket and then begin to see the notification.
Also, most employers don't appreciate seeing phones in the work place, so sometimes checking notifications can be problematic. A smart watch would definitely alleviate a lot of aggravation.
Definitely curious for what Samsung is going to put on the table next week. So far I think SONY's offering looks the most appealing out of all the smart watches. That should be coming out this September. Hopefully one of these third-party manufacturers will make their watch iOS compatible as well. I do not feel like waiting another year to start taking advantage of some of the amazing functionality a smart watch can offer.
08-29-2013, 03:08 PM #10
This product is obviously RUSHED ahead of an iWatch launch. Samsung just wants to be the (i did it first) company. They are so pathetic...
08-29-2013, 04:23 PM #11
Get a pebble
08-29-2013, 04:34 PM #12
The Following User Says Thank You to clive.weller For This Useful Post:
08-29-2013, 04:38 PM #13
08-29-2013, 08:45 PM #14
08-29-2013, 10:32 PM #15
My Bluetooth watch lasts 3 weeks between charges and it...
controls my music and...
shows caller ID and...
vibrates when the phone is out of range and...
allows me to silently reject calls that I was only aware of thanks to the watch vibrating on my wrist and...
looks like a normal analog watch and...
shows me email and text notifications and contents and...
so much more.
It's a Sony-Ericsson MBW-150 from 2007. The original MBW-100 is even older.
Half the point of a smart watch is to tap into the power in your pocket and not risk dropping the phone. No reason to have tons of processing power and storage when there's a phone in your pocket for that. Even if you wanted interactive touchscreen watch apps on a full color display it makes more sense to make it a remote display for the phone and storage in your pocket. This way it doesn't have to compromise on power, storage, or battery life to do everything half as well on your wrist and no one is wondering why they don't just integrate the cellular radio too.
08-30-2013, 01:59 AM #16
If it's just using bluetooth then it shouldn't be too much of a drain. Thanks for the info though, gives a better insight in a smart watch.
08-30-2013, 06:13 AM #17
Last edited by Nerd; 08-30-2013 at 06:23 AM.
09-29-2013, 01:14 AM #18