+ Reply
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Verizon to President Obama: Can You Hear Me Now?

is a discussion within the

iPhone News

forums, a part of the

General iPhone

section;
Wasting very little time connecting with the power players in Washington, one of Verizon's lead attorneys is reaching out to the White House for help in preventing a possible iPhone
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Michael Essany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana
    Posts
    3,724
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 1,479 Times in 565 Posts

    Default Verizon to President Obama: Can You Hear Me Now?


    Wasting very little time connecting with the power players in Washington, one of Verizon's lead attorneys is reaching out to the White House for help in preventing a possible iPhone ban stemming from Apple's ongoing legal battle with Samsung.

    In a detailed editorial published in the Wall Street Journal, Randal S. Milch - executive vice president of public policy and general counsel of Verizon Communications - articulated why President Obama should intervene and soon.

    By early August, the Obama administration must decide whether to veto the ITC's decision to bar the devices alleged to have infringed on a Samsung patent. Should it?
    The ITC, as we know, determined last month that AT&T versions of the iPhone 4, 3GS and 3G supposedly infringe on patents owned by Samsung. Per the ruling, these devices must be banned from sale by August 3rd, 2013. Verizon, not surprisingly, has been careful not to bash Samsung while standing behind Apple in this matter.

    Verizon would like to see the Obama administration veto the ITC's controversial decision, even though a sitting president hasn't made such a move since 1987.

    "Patent litigation at the ITC — where the only remedy is to keep products from the American public — is too high-stakes a game for patent disputes," Milch explained. "The fact that the ITC's intellectual-property dispute docket has nearly quadrupled over 15 years only raises the stakes further. Smartphone patent litigation accounts for a substantial share of that increase."

    To read the full editorial from The Wall Street Journal, click here.

    Source: WSJ
    Last edited by blkcadi; 07-25-2013 at 03:22 PM. Reason: date

  2. #2
    iPhone? More like MyPhone GooseG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Utah :\
    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    August 3th? Really? Is it too difficult for you guys to proofread your articles?

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to GooseG For This Useful Post:

    *T* (07-26-2013)

  4. #3
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    408
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 42 Times in 34 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by GooseG View Post
    August 3th? Really? Is it too difficult for you guys to proofread your articles?
    thank god this looser is almost gone .

  5. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    219
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 38 Times in 24 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by GooseG View Post
    August 3th? Really? Is it too difficult for you guys to proofread your articles?
    Is it really to difficult to ignore the error im sure you get the what theyre trying to say, unless youre an english teacher it shouldnt bother you that much, relax bro

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to xhazex9x For This Useful Post:

    iH85CH001 (07-25-2013)

  7. #5
    My iPhone is a Part of Me buggsy2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Sacramento, California
    Posts
    501
    Thanks
    461
    Thanked 86 Times in 62 Posts

    The ITC didn't determine that Apple "supposedly" infringed; it determined they infringed. Period.

  8. #6
    Green Apple i113's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts

    The 4 is all they still sell anyways. Pretty soon they'll offer the 4s 5s and plastic 5. Lol, they should call it the 5p.

    My point is, it doesn't really matter. If the 4 gets banned stateside then they'll have more inventory to focus on low cost markets elsewhere in the world.

  9. #7
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    317
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 32 Times in 21 Posts

    Any takers want to bet that August 2nd (possibly slightly sooner) will see an announcement from Apple introducing the lower cost iPhone 5-whatever it's called? This would make the ban utterly useless, as rumors have it that Apple is planning on discontinuing the sale of the iPhone 4S and lower.

  10. #8
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by tridley68 View Post
    thank god this looser is almost gone .
    Any chance to voice an opinion about the president must be taken... Even if it means misspelling the key to your comment...

  11. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bklyn NY !!
    Posts
    913
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked 62 Times in 51 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by buggsy2 View Post
    The ITC didn't determine that Apple "supposedly" infringed; it determined they infringed. Period.
    +1 very good point.

  12. #10
    iPhoneaholic iH85CH001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    United States of America
    Posts
    305
    Thanks
    383
    Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by GooseG View Post
    August 3th? Really? Is it too difficult for you guys to proofread your articles?
    Wtf r u talking about?

  13. #11
    Livin the iPhone Life steve-z17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,243
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 141 Times in 121 Posts

    Something's going to happen to stop the ban...hopefully.

  14. #12
    iPhone Warranty Voider Faresismail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    342
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 26 Times in 25 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by iH85CH001 View Post
    Wtf r u talking about?
    Its should be 3rd 😜

  15. #13
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    408
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 42 Times in 34 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-z17 View Post
    Something's going to happen to stop the ban...hopefully.
    Verizon to OB you are a **** head and stay out of our business you have enough trouble in your own administration.

  16. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    65
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    what is cooking here ... is Apple an essential ingredient..

  17. #15
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,132
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-z17 View Post
    Something's going to happen to stop the ban...hopefully.
    Sure when Apple pay Samsung for the rights to use the patent technology, as well as pay back payments for all the ones sold already.
    This is the easiest way out. Apple is found guilty, so they will have to pay for all the sold iPhones that infringe on the technology might as well get it over with.

    Or Apple release the new cheap iPhones early to take over the cheap phone category, then drag this case further and most likely have to pay anyways.
    Last edited by unison999; 07-26-2013 at 05:31 PM.

  18. #16
    Green Apple MyE350OwNz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 50 Times in 25 Posts

    This is an iphone forum so why do all i ever see here are comments from ihaters?!? Why dont you all go comment on that boring *** xda developers forum!!!

    All you do is talk **** about iphones but you stay on its **** by constantly posting comments on an iphone forum lmao!
    Last edited by MyE350OwNz; 07-29-2013 at 07:52 AM.

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts