+ Reply
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: New 'Leaked' Images of Apple's 'iPhone Lite' Hit The Web

is a discussion within the

iPhone News

forums, a part of the

General iPhone

section;
More leaked images of Apple's long-awaited low-cost iPhone are spreading across the blogosphere like wildfire today. If legitimate, the photos unquestionably represent the most detailed shots we have to date
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Michael Essany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana
    Posts
    3,609
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 1,474 Times in 561 Posts

    Default New 'Leaked' Images of Apple's 'iPhone Lite' Hit The Web


    More leaked images of Apple's long-awaited low-cost iPhone are spreading across the blogosphere like wildfire today.

    If legitimate, the photos unquestionably represent the most detailed shots we have to date of the so-called "iPhone Lite."

    Consistent with other component images turning up online in recent weeks, the newest shots of the iPhone Lite shell suggest that Apple will roll out the entry-level iPhone in a variety of colors from which consumers can choose. Surfacing first on Nowhereelse.fr, the shell shots depict red, yellow, white and blue models, although more options - including green - are expected.

    Apart from the color diversity on display, these new images don't really tell us much else about the rumored low-cost iPhone. Analysts still expect the cheaper model to simply phase out signature glass and metal components to accommodate a cheaper but highly durable plastic.

    Apple, it goes without saying, hasn't confirmed the device's existence. However, it's been apparent for quite some time now that Apple would like to crank out a cheaper iPhone in hopes of eliminating the need for carrier subsidies, which is something that would give Apple more flexibility in the manufacturing process.

    Source: Nowhereelse.fr

  2. #2
    Livin the iPhone Life bigboyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    North East Coast
    Posts
    1,541
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 170 Times in 122 Posts

    Well..this one won't quit guess its true. Would be a win for consumers that cannot afford a $600+ iPhone 5/5S. Just never thought a premium hardware maker would bother making hardware that is not well..premium. Guess time will tell us if this is true or not.

  3. #3
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    384
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked 319 Times in 152 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by bigboyz View Post
    Well..this one won't quit guess its true. Would be a win for consumers that cannot afford a $600+ iPhone 5/5S. Just never thought a premium hardware maker would bother making hardware that is not well..premium. Guess time will tell us if this is true or not.
    How can you say this is not "premium hardware"? The 3G and 3GS had plastic backs and I would have taken either of those backs over the 4/4S fragile to the touch glass.

  4. #4
    Green Apple thefinalhack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts

    This is a major faux pas for apple, they have built up a reputation for making quality products the appearance of these "iPhone lites" would damage the reputation they have built up.

  5. #5
    My iPhone is a Part of Me mlee19841's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    959
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 73 Times in 55 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynx83 View Post
    How can you say this is not "premium hardware"? The 3G and 3GS had plastic backs and I would have taken either of those backs over the 4/4S fragile to the touch glass.
    Same here. I do miss the 3G/3GS back. Plus people can't afford even the on contract price for the iPhone 5/5s. So a low budget one would be a perfect marketing plan to cover all bases

  6. #6
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    105
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts

    Even Porsche has the Boxster... entry level is it's own market and doesn't really effect the other half. Seems like an iPod with phone capabilities. Exactly what I felt they should do... golf clap

  7. #7
    My iPhone is a Part of Me klouud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    791
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 80 Times in 58 Posts

    they look cheap. I'm not impressed.

  8. #8
    Livin the iPhone Life steve-z17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 141 Times in 121 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by bigboyz View Post
    Well..this one won't quit guess its true. Would be a win for consumers that cannot afford a $600+ iPhone 5/5S. Just never thought a premium hardware maker would bother making hardware that is not well..premium. Guess time will tell us if this is true or not.

    I agree. To me they look like cheap plastic phones, not the style Apple rolls with. I just don't see them leaving the one iPhone released each year schedule, but I guess anything could happen.

  9. #9
    My iPhone is a Part of Me mlee19841's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    959
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 73 Times in 55 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-z17 View Post

    I agree. To me they look like cheap plastic phones, not the style Apple rolls with. I just don't see them leaving the one iPhone released each year schedule, but I guess anything could happen.
    They will never leave that idea. It's to much hype built around it. Only phone that has people camping out weeks before the phone is in stores.

  10. #10
    Livin the iPhone Life slim.jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Maryland, US
    Posts
    1,008
    Thanks
    115
    Thanked 128 Times in 98 Posts

    I'm still thinking these are cheap Chinese knockoffs. Nothing about those reflects Apples focus on design. And for the mentioned Boxster, $50,000 is far from a budget sports car. Let's be real not every company has to make something for everyone. If you can't afford it then find something you can. Samsung makes an 85" 4K tv that cost $40k, they don't have to now make one that is in the $2000 price range so more people can have one.

  11. #11
    Green Apple i113's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts

    Why is this surprising? They came out with the iPod shuffle. It's about as entry level as an MP3 player can get, but it hasn't hurt the company.

    Even Mercedes has the C class and it hasn't hurt the company, even though their S class customers probably wouldn't even buy their 16 yo kid one.

  12. #12
    Livin the iPhone Life slim.jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Maryland, US
    Posts
    1,008
    Thanks
    115
    Thanked 128 Times in 98 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by i113 View Post
    Why is this surprising? They came out with the iPod shuffle. It's about as entry level as an MP3 player can get, but it hasn't hurt the company.

    Even Mercedes has the C class and it hasn't hurt the company, even though their S class customers probably wouldn't even buy their 16 yo kid one.
    It's surprising because if these pics do turn out to be real, it's hideous. Apple is and always has been a design centered company. Apple products must function the best in the market and look sexy doing it.

  13. #13
    Green Apple i113's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts

    What's hideous about it? The 3G(s) versions had rounded back shells and the did ok.
    Remember the "fishbowl" iMacs? They came in a bunch of colors, were fun, and successful. Even still, I've never heard them referred to as "sexy" I also don't remember the Mac Pro users complaining about the low end system being introduced.
    And for all you Steve Jobs disciples, he was the mastermind behind the colorful iMacs.

  14. #14
    Livin the iPhone Life slim.jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Maryland, US
    Posts
    1,008
    Thanks
    115
    Thanked 128 Times in 98 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by i113 View Post
    What's hideous about it? The 3G(s) versions had rounded back shells and the did ok.
    Remember the "fishbowl" iMacs? They came in a bunch of colors, were fun, and successful. Even still, I've never heard them referred to as "sexy" I also don't remember the Mac Pro users complaining about the low end system being introduced.
    And for all you Steve Jobs disciples, he was the mastermind behind the colorful iMacs.
    They might have had plastic in the past but that was also back when the machining technology wasn't available to produce such low tolerance metal casings. Apple has phased out all plastics casings from their products, why would they reintroduce it? There is also a big difference between a plastic low end iPhone and a "low end" Mac Pro. The "low end" Mac Pro was still very powerful and still looked like a Mac Pro.

    A plastic iPhone would be a 5 year step backwards.

    Notice these "iPhones" don't have any of the license information or product model info printed on them at all. If they took the time to print the word iPhone then why didn't they also print that on the casing?
    Last edited by slim.jim; 07-03-2013 at 07:04 PM.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bklyn NY !!
    Posts
    913
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked 62 Times in 51 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by bigboyz View Post
    Well..this one won't quit guess its true. Would be a win for consumers that cannot afford a $600+ iPhone 5/5S. Just never thought a premium hardware maker would bother making hardware that is not well..premium. Guess time will tell us if this is true or not.
    the iPhone 5 only costs $99 the 4 and 4S can be had for free or 99 cents.

  16. #16
    My iPhone is a Part of Me vinaygoel2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    747
    Thanks
    396
    Thanked 76 Times in 61 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by jOnGarrett View Post
    the iPhone 5 only costs $99 the 4 and 4S can be had for free or 99 cents.
    iPhone 4 costs $450, 4S costs $550 and 5 costs $650. Wake up!!!

  17. #17
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Ughhh.. Mr. Jobs would roll over in his grave at the idea of this, although I do like how Apple is starting to go back to the color pallet as they did so well in earl 2000's

  18. #18
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    I think it's drastically important to note that these shells are wrapped in plastic protective shields... You can see the bubbles. With that, I'dd like to think that these phones aren't as cheap feeling and looking as, you know, the galaxy s4. I would hope these plastics have a more solid feel... Just like the iPhone 3GS did. Or the iPhone 3G.

    My point is that, even early production models of the iPhone 5 looked really cheap... And let me tel you, the build quality on the device in my hands is FAR from cheap.

  19. #19
    Alliance hemptation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Madison,MS
    Posts
    3,154
    Thanks
    31,802
    Thanked 11,236 Times in 2,713 Posts

    Agreed Derek. And to add The weight and feel
    Of any phone has just as much to do with what's in it as what it is wrapped in.

  20. #20
    Livin the iPhone Life thazsar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    3,829
    Thanks
    297
    Thanked 1,601 Times in 777 Posts

    Maybe its the iPhone 6! LOL!

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts