Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
iPhone Newsforums, a part of the
After getting a petition passed (and rather favorably answered ) to "make unlocking cell phones legal," 27 year old Sina Khanifar has teamed up with digital rights advocates and other...
03-06-2013, 02:52 PM #1
Just what are your rights with your devices? Fixing the DMCA
After getting a petition passed (and rather favorably answered) to "make unlocking cell phones legal," 27 year old Sina Khanifar has teamed up with digital rights advocates and other organizations to go one step further and "fix the DMCA."
The FixTheDMCA campaign, backed by organizations including the EFF, Y Combinator, reddit, mozilla, and saurik, is attempting to have section 1201 ("The Anti-Circumvention Provision") of the DMCA repealed. They note effects such as the clear and permanent legality of:
- Unlocking cell phones
- Jailbreaking phones, tablets, and game consoles
- Screen reading software for the blind
- Backing up DVDs
Khanifar is a long-time unlocking champion, getting his early experience running a Motorola unlocking service (which we actually worked with him in regards to on our old site TheMotoGuide.com, and ModMyMoto.com). At that time, Motorola had approached him stating his actions were illegal, but after receiving only minor legal pressure back from Sina and help, Motorola backed down.
While speaking about the campaign with Khanifar, he stated:
I'm really glad we made it to the number of signatures needed and got such a great response from the White House. But I'm concerned politicians will fix unlocking without dealing with the root cause of the problem, which is the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions. I'm hoping FixTheDMCA will help move the conversation to the larger issues, and precipitate a bigger amendment to section 1201 that'll fix a lot of the parts of the DMCA we tinkerers have been complaining about since the bill was passed.
It's interesting to note, while most major media outlets like to say things which didn't get exempted were "declared illegal," that is not actually true at all. "Not declared exempt" is quite different from "was explicitly declared illegal."
In 2009 Fred von Lohmann of the EFF had this to say about Apple's "jailbreaking should be illegal" claims, and his words ring just as true today:
One need only transpose Apple's arguments to the world of automobiles to recognize their absurdity. Sure, GM might tell us that, for our own safety, all servicing should be done by an authorized GM dealer using only genuine GM parts. Toyota might say that swapping your engine could reduce the reliability of your car. And Mazda could say that those who throw a supercharger on their Miatas frequently exceed the legal speed limit.
But we'd never accept this corporate paternalism as a justification for welding every car hood shut and imposing legal liability on car buffs tinkering in their garages. After all, the culture of tinkering (or hacking, if you prefer) is an important part of our innovation economy.
ModMyi.com fully supports the efforts of FixTheDMCA.org - our community's name speaks to our tinkerer mindset; we love modifying our gear. Modifying, hacking, customizing - however you term it, the practice makes something we already love even more intensely ours. It's an approach which has driven innovation for ages.
Last edited by Kyle Matthews; 03-06-2013 at 03:32 PM..
↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A [select] [start] Kyle Matthews
The Following User Says Thank You to Kyle Matthews For This Useful Post:
03-06-2013, 03:42 PM #2
Tweeted and emailed my reps. Fingers crossed.
The Following User Says Thank You to blkcadi For This Useful Post:
03-06-2013, 04:52 PM #3
u can already unlock your iphone when u get done with the contract. what is the big deal here? jeez man if u dont want to wait, then buy a non subsidized iphone. lol although i do agree, u should be able to back up dvds u own. i guess people are just trying to get an unlocked iphone for 199....bottom line is that if u dont want to follow a carriers terms, then dont sign their contract. people need to stop acting like they are forced into this. you guys want it both ways, and the car analogy in the article doesnt really apply to this, because when u buy an iphone, u are using the carrier that helped u obtain it at a cheaper price. its around 60 percent off what the maker, which is apple says it should sell for. now when is the last time that u walked into a dealership and bought a brand new chevy silverado for 12000 dollars? it aint gonna happen stop complaining!!!! the only thing this is gonna do is make carriers raise prices so gee thanks guys...
03-06-2013, 05:18 PM #4
Feanor64, this has been beat to death, burned, buried, dug up, beat again, burned again. Please don't comment you will change no ones mind let everyone think what they want and chose what they want. I don't think it's about jumping ship or boning carriers it's about choice.
03-06-2013, 05:26 PM #5
...backed by organizations including the EFF, Y Combinator, reddit, mozilla, and saurik...
03-06-2013, 05:34 PM #6
03-06-2013, 05:38 PM #7
03-06-2013, 06:34 PM #8
This is about much more than unlocking, which the previous petition was focusing on. This is about repealing section 1201 ("The Anti-Circumvention Provision") of the DMCA.
The Following User Says Thank You to Kyle Matthews For This Useful Post:
03-06-2013, 06:38 PM #9
Exactly right, I understand and fully support staying in the contract you sign up for but I shouldn't have to pay 5 dollars a minute or 22,000 in data charges if and when I travel abroad.
03-06-2013, 06:48 PM #10
I didn't sign the unlocking petition because it doesn't affect me in the slightest - but a petition to fix the DMCA? I'll definitely sign that.
03-06-2013, 07:17 PM #11Originally Posted by Feanor64
03-06-2013, 07:38 PM #12
03-06-2013, 08:37 PM #13
03-06-2013, 08:39 PM #14
03-06-2013, 09:06 PM #15
03-06-2013, 09:23 PM #16
EDIT: Found the article, and I think it's something everyone might benefit from reading. When I originally read the article, it indicated that this was the stock format of all AT&T iPhone 5's (unlocked abroad by default), but since then they've apparently looked into the matter a bit further and discovered that you must contact AT&T to take advantage of in-contract overseas unlocks. According to these guys, you can call AT&T and they will unlock your iPhone 5 (while under contract) for use overseas, though it will remain locked to AT&T within the United States for the duration of your contract. Couldn't hurt to try I suppose, I'll be contacting AT&T about this shortly.
Last edited by twitchee3; 03-06-2013 at 09:37 PM.
03-07-2013, 12:03 AM #17
03-07-2013, 04:27 AM #18
03-07-2013, 08:16 AM #19
The trick in all this is In understanding what you own and what you don't own with your phone. The only people that truly "own" their iPhones are people that pay full retail price for them to have no contract and be fully unlocked. Those people "fully own" their iPhones. People who pay the subsidized lower rate are truly only "leasing" their iPhone if you read the user agreements carefully. This is why they can tell us what to do with unlocking and even one day jailbreaking possibly.
They are on less stable ground, legally, with the purchase of iPads. We "fully own" our iPads. They can't tell us "squat" to do with something we fully own. No legal case against someone jailbreaking their iPad could ever win in a court of law in United States.
The unlocking a subsidized iPhone issue is much more ironclad legally on the part of the carriers with or without the DMCA rulings.
Think of the $199, $299, $399 as a down payment on the lease of your leased car. It's just the same thing, gang. You don't own anything.
Last edited by NewdestinyX; 03-07-2013 at 08:20 AM.Here to help if I can. If I can't I know someone who can!
03-07-2013, 12:43 PM #20
But thanks for judging me, again, stranger I have never met...
Best regards to you sir =)
Last edited by twitchee3; 03-07-2013 at 12:52 PM.