Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
01-22-2013, 08:58 AM #41
I'm going to learn from my mistakes... Not buying a new phone unless its jail broken, I love my 5, but after using a jail broken 4S for so long I can't help but want more out of it....
01-22-2013, 09:08 AM #42Here to help if I can. If I can't I know someone who can!
01-22-2013, 09:30 AM #43
My fav apps not optimized: speedtest, iNet, hurricane, GTA 3.
I could keep going but I'm sure you are seeing a pattern here.
None of those are apple apps btw.
01-22-2013, 11:09 AM #44
So yes I would say that is some what fragmentation, but the fact they work on the iPhone 5 as good as any of the past Idevices, calling it a straight up fragmentation is a bit of a stretch.
But again just my opinion.
01-22-2013, 11:22 AM #45
01-22-2013, 11:27 AM #46
Lol so dumb. None a this is happening. How would this be profitable for apple? Lol come on now. Everyone owns an iPhone 5 already or just got 4s for Christmas. Nobody is eligible for an upgrade. Sales would be terrible. And anyone who wanted a bigger screen, owns a galaxy or a note now, on a new contract. So nobody is buying a bigger iphone. Sales would be horrible. Anyone who wanted a cheaper version iphone, owns a free iphone 4 or 99 dollar iPhone 4S...plus apple already said they have no interest in making a cheaper watered down phone. When was the last time ANY rumor on a new phone outside of apples yearly release was true? Lol never. Haha stop it. iPhone mini has been rumored and fake for like 4 years. Remember the red iphone for cancer or whatever? Didn't happen. Last year they said they was releasing two iphone versions, we got one. Lol. Come on yo. Apple will release one iphone a year like they always do. Stop wit all the foolery.
01-22-2013, 12:19 PM #47
Yes, iOS has fragmentation but it's in now way anywhere near what android is and there isn't much way it ever will be there... We don't have as many barriers to preventing the latest software getting to the phones once it's released. It sucks but it's true...
"Not all iDevices can run the same version of iOS = fragmentation"
Yes... but if a a 3GS can run the latest OS, that is more than enough, it's an old phone and there has been 3 phone iterations after it already...
"Not all iPhones of the same model work the same way on all carriers = fragmentation"
Android is better in this how?
"most apps for the iPhone 5 are NOT optimized for the longer screen"
What are these "most apps"? Things that people rarely use? Most of the things that are still relevant or not tottaly replaced by something way better are actually very well maintained and up to date. I have to say though, Apple moving to the different aspect ratio really surprised me.
At the end of the day, I say just use what you like. Android, iOS, WiMo... whatever, don't know why people care about other's decisions. This is not a religion and even if it was, no one like that waved in their face either.
01-22-2013, 02:41 PM #48
Apple came up with the idea of larger phones first. The Galaxy Note just copied the iPhone Math. WTF is wrong with you stupid phandroids? Android and Samsuck need to stop copying Apple and think of their own ideas. The Note is such a rip-off of the iPhone Math.
I wish Apple had a monopoly.
01-22-2013, 09:57 PM #49
01-22-2013, 10:33 PM #50
This isn't completely a bad thing. A step up in size would be good, but they really need to focus on the OS. Some major improvements would make me stick around a little bit longer. Wanna hear what a lot of us faithful iPhone users really feel? Come check out AAPL2apples.com.
Last edited by A2A; 01-22-2013 at 10:37 PM.
01-23-2013, 06:23 AM #51
Apple hasn't become the most profitable company "in the world" (surpassing Microsoft by a mile!) without knowing how and when to "refresh" its brand. There's a lot of competition out there making some damn fine phones so, for sure, their job is harder now. But how quickly we lose faith. The next cool thing is right around the corner gang - but it won't be soon. There are only so many innovations out there possible. It's not like there's another "smartphone" or "tablet" to invent. What they can so is improve. But changing their philosophy and archetype of product lines would be the death of Apple.
In my view they will eventually need to go a little wider on the phone (but no taller) to return the phone's aspect ratio to be more compatible with a lot if the video market. So many videos are not true 16:9 wide screen yet. So they look wrong on my iP5. Of course true widescreen 16:9 stuff looks great on the 'taller only' iP5 screen. But they should have made it both wider and taller.Here to help if I can. If I can't I know someone who can!
01-23-2013, 10:19 AM #52
Another thing, why do people want a cheaper, dumbed down iPhone? Are you guys going to abandon your full-featured ones for a limited one to save $30 a month? I don't get it... If you don't want to pay as much up front, then just get an iPhone 4 for free or a 4S for $100!
The only advantage I could see for a cheaper one, would be one that doesn't do cellular data so you wouldn't have to pay $30-50 extra a month. But I would never buy it, I'm spoiled by my iPhone 5 with AT&Ts tethering plan... It's expensive, but worth it if you use it a lot.
01-23-2013, 02:20 PM #53
I wouldn't be surprised in the least if other companies follow suite. However ill still be happy with a wider screen because title blocks are not any type of annoyance to me. Besides most videos that are not in 1080/720 p and have title blocks are normally crappy quality and title blocks are the least of my worries on those lol
01-23-2013, 02:28 PM #54
What looks AMAZING on the new iP5's widescreen ratio are movies cut in widescreen on Netflix and HuluPlus, etc. These are amazing. But that's not what most people are watching on their iPhones since those are 'paid services'. What most people watch is YouTube which is only about half widescreen at this point. That's not enough to make phone manufacturers go with widescreen aspect ratio. I wish THEY DID!!! On that point we both agree!!!! LOL! What you've refused to acknowledge is how much video (quality being equal) is still out there on non-widescreen. I agree - the industry IS moving that direction. But we won't get there fast enough for the 'taller skinny' phone (widescreen in landscape) mode to catch on as the norm any time soon.
But we've already debated this and agreed to disagree. We don't have to do it again. You've now reminded people of your position, I've reminded people of mine. Nuff said.
Last edited by NewdestinyX; 01-23-2013 at 02:31 PM.
01-23-2013, 02:47 PM #55
01-23-2013, 02:56 PM #56
01-23-2013, 03:01 PM #57
01-23-2013, 04:48 PM #58
Whenever I make a comment here you can be sure it's more than just a capricious opinion. It is based on research, lots of it, and things I've had to do for my job or lots of hobby time I spend here. I'm not interested in just handing out simple opinions here. That's a waste of all of our time.Here to help if I can. If I can't I know someone who can!
01-23-2013, 08:50 PM #59
"YouTube uses 16:9 aspect ratio players. If you are uploading a non-16:9 file, it will be processed and displayed correctly as well, with pillar boxes (black bars on the left and right) or letter boxes (black bars at the top and bottom) provided by the player. If you want to fit the player perfectly, encode at these resolutions:"
Also when searching YouTube app on your phone the thumbnails on the left are also 16:9. You can quickly tell a video that is not 16:9 format by seeing if there is any title blocks in the thumb nail: as shown in the following screen shot the 4th down
Also I took your advice. I did a search for music videos on YouTube. You had said to look at the first 30 and about half should be standard 4:3. Well below are the first 29 videos that populate. Not one single video is not in a wide screen 16:9 or greater format.
So by your study it looks as if 100 percent is 16:9 or greater
The Following User Says Thank You to subywrex For This Useful Post:
01-23-2013, 10:01 PM #60
Last edited by NewdestinyX; 01-23-2013 at 10:14 PM.