Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 37 of 37

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Samsung Executive: "Fighting Over Rectangles" is Unreasonable

  1. #21
    I own plenty of Apple products. But I have to side with Samsung. So if Apple had its way. No one could ever produce a rectangular smart phone in black? Thats like saying Nike has a patent on shoe laces and if another company comes up with a footwear device that uses shoe laces they are gonna sue.
    The only reason Apple likes to sue is that they overcharge for their products. They dont want the masses to see that anything even remotely similar can be sold for a fraction of the price. Its like a drug dealer who gets pissed that their is a new dealer in town selling stuff for 1/2 price.
    Besides, that Samsung Galaxy looks awesome. Why cant Apple come out with a smart phone that nice and big? Are they afraid that they dont own the patent on a 4.7 inch screen?

  2. #22
    "that's the way the system should work"
    I'm an apple fan boy... And I agree with Samsung right now from that article. On the fence now ... Lol

    If only they made a different shape lol

  3. #23
    Livin the iPhone Life Carvensno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Fresno, Calli
    Posts
    2,011
    Thanks
    2,650
    Thanked 1,752 Times in 751 Posts

    Well Nokia designed a new looking windows phone without it looking like the iPhone and it's rectangle in shape. So it is possible to make a Phone without it looking like the iPhone.

    Plus they have already said that the iPhone 5 was SJ last project that he involved with.

  4. #24
    Default Wow
    Quote Originally Posted by Nerd View Post
    Apple is such a patent troll. The S-Voice feature in the GS3 is derived from Vlingo's tech that existed prior to Siri.
    I suspect that this is Apple's ploy all along. To try to disrupt a product right before it launches so that it loses it's popularity with the public. They tried the same with HTC recently. As far as I can see Apple has never invented anything. They are a great marketer and purchaser of others' patents. But as companies become mega-goliaths instead of spending money on R&D and improved production lines they use the courts to improve their bottom line and hurt consumer choice and buying power.
    What are you talking about? Apple has never invented anything?! You sir, are way off. I am pretty sure the iPod was the start of mp3 players similar to that, and their operating system Mac OS X. No operating system was even close to Mac's. Apple has invented hundreds of things.

  5. #25
    These comments have been fun to read.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Raybeast View Post
    What are you talking about? Apple has never invented anything?! You sir, are way off. I am pretty sure the iPod was the start of mp3 players similar to that, and their operating system Mac OS X. No operating system was even close to Mac's. Apple has invented hundreds of things.
    The iPod was NOT the first digital music player (or "MP3 player" ). In the 90's there was the MPMan, Diamond Rio (a friend of mine had one), Creative NOMAD Jukebox, HanGo Personal Jukebox (I had one), and several others. Apple did not invent such a thing by any means, they just designed their own and gained success from it.

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Raybeast View Post
    What are you talking about? Apple has never invented anything?! You sir, are way off. I am pretty sure the iPod was the start of mp3 players similar to that, and their operating system Mac OS X. No operating system was even close to Mac's. Apple has invented hundreds of things.
    You sir should pick up Jobs book and read how he obtained a lot of the technology they employ today. Jobs openly admitted to stealing ideas from IBM and things from devices to create that little ipod. and said he had no shame in doing it. Look at the ideas taken from Android in iOS 5, like the notification center. Which is a piece of trash on an unhacked iPhone.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by dsg View Post
    I think patent battles should be solved with a fist fight between the CEOs of the company's involved
    a fight to the death would be even better

  9. #29
    Just for the SAKE to stir more S$%^ up, we forgot about this lovley phone. came out the same year iPhone Gen1 did...

    HTC Touch Dual
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Touch_Dual

    -350px-touch-dual-closed.jpg

    so why didnt Apple go after them.. ?

  10. #30
    What's Jailbreak? fadadman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Belize,Central America
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by NakedFaerie View Post
    Apple NEED to loose a lot of these pathetic cases.
    The only reason Apple sue Samsung is because they know Samsung have a better product and Apple cant compete against such a good product so they sue them and try to ban the better product instead of making a better product themselves.
    ^
    im inclined to agree with you

    Quote Originally Posted by scottjl View Post
    If they didn't want to get sued over it, they shouldn't have pretty much copied Apple's design, hell it's been shown even the cables, power brick and box were pretty much ripoffs! Don't tell me they couldn't have used any other design.

    Samsung is only crying foul because they're the one being sued, if someone copied off their designs they'd be suing them, any company that says otherwise is full of it.
    My friend,your'e ignorant to the facts. even apple knows that Samsung phones are favoured among consumers. if it was just a cheap piece of plastic why even bother? unless it posses competition.
    Last edited by fadadman; 07-31-2012 at 04:50 PM.

  11. #31
    Honestly, it is not about the shape of the phone; it is the appearance/look of the phone. Appearance does sell. Samsung is fully aware of that. Do you think Samsung would copy the look of a Windows/Nokia phone? If you want to copy the look of a phone, copy the top selling phone - iPhone. It wouldn't hurt. Samsung knows it. Samsung is not the only company doing that. All the Korean companies are following this copy-cat principal. Have you noticed that? Most of the Korean cars look just like a German car, Bimmer/MB/Audi. Why? Just ilke what I said earlier, appearance does sell. And it doesn't hurt to copy.

  12. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by sw606 View Post
    Honestly, it is not about the shape of the phone; it is the appearance/look of the phone. Appearance does sell. Samsung is fully aware of that. Do you think Samsung would copy the look of a Windows/Nokia phone? If you want to copy the look of a phone, copy the top selling phone - iPhone. It wouldn't hurt. Samsung knows it. Samsung is not the only company doing that. All the Korean companies are following this copy-cat principal. Have you noticed that? Most of the Korean cars look just like a German car, Bimmer/MB/Audi. Why? Just ilke what I said earlier, appearance does sell. And it doesn't hurt to copy.
    Appearance = SEX/Y which sells..

  13. #33
    It is not about the shape; It is the APPEARANCE/LOOK of the phone. Appearance does sell. Samsung understands that. Do you think Samsung would copy the look of a Windows/Nokia phone? The motto is, "if you want to copy, copy the best one." That is what Samsung has been doing. Samsung is not the only Korean company doing that. Most of the Korean companies are following that copy-cat way. Have you not noticed that most of the Korean cars look like a German car, Bimmer/MB/Audi? Why? Just like what I said earlier, APPEARANCE DOES SELL.

    It is not about the shape; It is the APPEARANCE/LOOK of the phone. Appearance does sell. Samsung understands that. Do you think Samsung would copy the look of a Windows/Nokia phone? The motto is, "if you want to copy, copy the best one." That is what Samsung has been doing. Samsung is not the only Korean company doing that. Most of the Korean companies are following that copy-cat way. Have you not noticed that most of the Korean cars look like a German car, Bimmer/MB/Audi? Why? Just like what I said earlier, APPEARANCE DOES SELL.

    Quote Originally Posted by pcboy123 View Post
    Appearance = SEX/Y which sells..
    You got it.
    Last edited by sw606; 07-31-2012 at 07:17 PM.

  14. #34
    since when can anyone patent a basic mathematical shape? the patent system is totally ****** up

  15. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by rkswat View Post
    I agree with both of you. If Henry ford could of cornered the market with a patent for "motorized vehicle with 4 wheels" he would of cleaned house....... What other design does one expect a phone to come in?
    Look at how most phones look like before iPhone was introduced, and then look at how most phones look like after iPhone was introduced, you will know that "other designs" were dominant. Apple took the risk of making the big change and happened to be successful. Shouldn't all of the other companies give Apple at least a little respect by not copying the style too closely? Among all of these company, Samsung is the one did thing too much to an extreme -- they just use almost exactly the same styles Apple took the risk of testing the market!

    Quote Originally Posted by pcboy123 View Post
    Just for the SAKE to stir more S$%^ up, we forgot about this lovley phone. came out the same year iPhone Gen1 did...

    HTC Touch Dual
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Touch_Dual

    -350px-touch-dual-closed.jpg

    so why didnt Apple go after them.. ?
    Come on, that one is too much different from any version of iPhone. Simply pick any Andriod phone ever shipped, you will see that they are more similar to an iPhone than this HTC Touch Dual.

    Quote Originally Posted by td1439 View Post
    The real problem is whoever decided Apple should be given patents for shapes and colors. That's just asinine. That being said, if Apple was so confident in the quality of their products, you'd think they would lay off the endless lawsuits.
    You still don't get the slightest idea. Apple is not regarding its products as pure technology products, it is regarding them as fashion products with near-to-cutting-edge technology. When it comes to fashion products, the look and feel, or say "style", is a very important property to protect.
    Last edited by tongxinshe; 08-01-2012 at 03:27 AM.

  16. #36
    Green Apple thomaspeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    76
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Well, to him they may be just rectangle but one can know in detail about the policy of the Apple from the statement of the Steve jobs who said that he would go thermo-nuclear against the android... which means for Apple, the devices are much more than just rectangles.

  17. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by tongxinshe View Post
    Look at how most phones look like before iPhone was introduced, and then look at how most phones look like after iPhone was introduced, you will know that "other designs" were dominant.
    You know, I'm really getting tired of hearing this (non)argument.

    First of all, there is plenty of evidence showing that phones were already heading in this direction, so it's quite possible phones would have ended up this shape even if the iPhone had never come to pass, it just may have taken longer.

    Second, devices of rectangular shape and a home page full of icons has been around LONG before, back in the day of the Pal Pilot, which came out in the mid 1990's. This is the basic design that the iPhone uses, which shouldn't be that surprising considering how generic in both physical and software appearance it is. On the software side, it's just a grid of icons with labels, hardly something new. It's a great device for what it is (all the better when jail broken, IMHO), but please don't sit there and pretend that everything about the iPhone was Apple's original idea.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •