Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
iPhone Newsforums, a part of the
Originally Posted by Tony1979 Alchemy is possible Swanson. We call them particle accelerators. Don't forget flying....
02-18-2012, 12:34 PM #21
02-18-2012, 12:56 PM #22
i actually dropped my 3G in boiling water(I don't know how that happened), took it to Apple and of course got rejected because of that red sticker. Took it to AT&T and said my phone is acting funny. They didn't know what was wrong with it so they gave me a new one.
Anybody else took their water damaged iphone to AT&T?
02-18-2012, 01:25 PM #23
02-18-2012, 01:54 PM #24
Seems to me that Apple should instead focus its energies on making the phone water-proof. There would be no need then to detect water damage. Why not solve the problem instead of fixing the symptom?
02-18-2012, 03:27 PM #25
i thought Apple were in cahoots with H2o who would coat the phones at manufacture stage, the same as liquipel at the ces show?
02-18-2012, 03:46 PM #26
shouldnt they be trying to improve water PROTECTION instead of water DETECTION?
PS. In my opinion, certain language used in this article is immature and annoying.
02-19-2012, 07:22 AM #27
I would rather them work on water resistance technology then this
02-20-2012, 08:03 AM #28Apple is looking to add “preventing water damage” to that list with new improved ways of indicating if you exposed your gadgets to a little midnight turd fishing in the toilet.
02-20-2012, 09:14 AM #29
How about simply making the phone water proof instead? I mean we can make water proof cameras that can play and record sounds...why can't they make a water proof phone?
Oh, right, then they don't get to rip customers off by saying they have to buy a new phone because the one they had was water damaged....
02-23-2012, 07:46 AM #30
No confundas mi personalidad con mi actitud. Mi personalidad es quien soy yo, mi actitud depende de quien seas tú.