-
09-26-2011, 08:42 PM #1MMi Staff Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 1,104
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 72 Times in 39 Posts
Apple Denied Trademark for 'Multitouch'

It only took four years, but Apple has finally been denied the "multitouch" trademark.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board at the United States Patent and Trademark Office upheld a USTPO lawyer’s decision to deny Apple’s initial 2007 trademark application. Apple’s failed appeal means the term “Mutlitouch,” not the technology itself, is free for anyone to use.
The trademark attorney pointed out that the term “multitouch” has taken on a generic meaning and an extremely large number of manufacturers and publications use the term to describe the touch based interfaces found in nearly every phone and tablet currently on the market. The ruling in its entirety can be found here on Scribd.
While this trademark filing isn’t as bad as Facebook trying to trademark “Face,” the USPTO made the right decision to deny Apple the Multitouch trademark. What other generic meaning would other touch-based devices use to describe their user interfaces? MuchTouch? LotsaTouch? BadTouch? GoodTouch?“Thus, from the foregoing, we find that “multi-touch” not only identifies the technology, but also describes how a user of the goods operates the device. Based on the evidence discussed above, as well as other evidence in the record, we agree with the examining attorney that MULTI-TOUCH indeed is highly descriptive of a feature of the identified goods. We now consider whether applicant has submitted sufficient evidence to establish acquired distinctiveness of this highly descriptive term.” — USPTO
Apple especially shouldn’t be granted a trademark for a technology they didn’t even invent. Here’s an article from 1997 describing multitouch devices. I guess sometimes even with $70 billion in the bank you can't change common sense. Most of the time though you can.
Source: MacRumors
-
09-26-2011, 08:56 PM #2Theme Creator
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- file://
- Posts
- 3,568
- Thanks
- 156
- Thanked 1,135 Times in 564 Posts
Sounds good to me

-
09-26-2011, 09:05 PM #3iPhone? More like MyPhone
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Posts
- 191
- Thanks
- 81
- Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Thank God!
-
09-26-2011, 09:34 PM #4Livin the iPhone Life
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 1,016
- Thanks
- 4
- Thanked 85 Times in 58 Posts
lol. Nice try Apple.
-
09-26-2011, 10:23 PM #5
Good...
iPhone 4 Verizon
4.2.8
Untethered jailbroken w/ Sn0wbreeze
-
09-27-2011, 12:39 AM #6
-
09-27-2011, 01:30 AM #7Livin the iPhone Life
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- The Future
- Posts
- 1,892
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 142 Times in 131 Posts
-
09-27-2011, 02:05 AM #8
-
09-27-2011, 02:25 AM #9
-
09-27-2011, 03:49 AM #10Green Apple
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Broken Christchurch - New Zealand
- Posts
- 38
- Thanks
- 9
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
-
09-27-2011, 05:11 AM #11iPhone? More like MyPhone
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Milky Way, Solar System, Earth
- Posts
- 106
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
It's good to hear that not everyone in the court lost common sense.These kind of patents should be denied to everyone, regardless of cash deposits or company presence.Wonder what will happen to "face" of Facebook.
-
09-27-2011, 08:27 AM #12
-
09-27-2011, 02:49 PM #13Previously Known as A.T
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Manchester, UK
- Posts
- 1,505
- Thanks
- 188
- Thanked 111 Times in 94 Posts
Just trademark Pinch To Zoom and patent that technology so other can't copy it.
-
09-27-2011, 06:14 PM #14



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

