Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
iPhone Newsforums, a part of the
Originally Posted by steve-z17 The e-reader biz is very competitive right now so I can understand why Apple changed the rules. This company knew that going into it and it...
05-11-2011, 05:47 PM #21
05-11-2011, 06:04 PM #22
Do you have any idea how hard it was for me to read this entire article along with their official note? Damn near impossible. It makes me cringe, it makes me nauseous, it fuels the fire deep inside me to see to see Apple, a multi BILLION dollar company, attack little businesses like this.
I am fully aware of the competitive market with e-reading at this moment, but for Apple to allow this app, and then, two months later, bend them over and brutally rape them like this...it disgusts me!
05-11-2011, 06:17 PM #23
05-11-2011, 06:23 PM #24
05-11-2011, 06:57 PM #25
05-11-2011, 06:58 PM #26
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
05-11-2011, 07:36 PM #27
05-11-2011, 07:50 PM #28
Walmart does the same thing but not digitally... at least they don't have a 6 or 12 month lease that they cannot afford. Or how about liquidating all their merchandise? This is all done from a computer! DIGITALLY... I feel bad for them but they should have seen this coming trying to compete with big corporations.
05-11-2011, 08:52 PM #29
05-11-2011, 09:16 PM #30
Last edited by steve-z17; 05-11-2011 at 09:16 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
05-12-2011, 12:06 AM #31
It's interesting that Congress took an immediate interest in Apple's location gate scandal, but ignores the much larger issues of Apple's monopolistic practices in the music, advertising and publishing industries.
It's hard enough for companies like Barnes & Noble to survive in a publishing market that has changed from paper to digital. It makes it impossible when companies like Apple are not playing fair in these markets and are stiffling the competition.
It's time for the DOJ to step in and make Apple play fair and congress to stop grandstanding with the "location gate scandal"."When I die, I want to go peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather did...not kicking and screaming like the passengers in his car." -- Unknown
05-12-2011, 01:45 AM #32
No. Wait, people had balls back then. The leading carriage manufacturer started General Motors, instead of looking for a handout and crying like a 7 year old girl with a scraped knee.
They can take their coding experience and make the next Angry Birds. Or they can whine and b*tch about Apple while someone else does. Either way, Apple is on top.iPhone 4 to Android directly back to iPhone 4. I learned my lesson and will never leave iOS again.
05-12-2011, 05:27 AM #33
05-12-2011, 05:53 AM #34
Currently, Amazon (via Kindle app) and B&N (via Nook app) use mobile Safari to conduct transactions, then the app downloads content from either Amazon or B&N: Apple is not in the loop.
This is a big distinction, which is why they don't have to fork over an additional 30% to Apple. Your article implies they get hit the same way that BeamItDown does. They don't.
The fear is that the Feb subscription announcement is going to hit booksellers as well.
Our philosophy is simple—when Apple brings a new subscriber to the app, Apple earns a 30 percent share; when the publisher brings an existing or new subscriber to the app, the publisher keeps 100 percent and Apple earns nothing,” said Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO
I don't disagree that Apple's 30% is a bit rich, or requiring everything to take place within the app instead of a browser is a bit over the top, but it's a little more nuanced than what your article presents.
05-12-2011, 06:05 AM #35
As far as the company goes they should have never fully trusted Apple. Especially if your product that's something that would essentially compete with something Apple already has; even if Apple approved and seemed to be on your side. Cause at first Apple didn't see you as a threat but once that changed it was game over. This should be a lesson to all developers... WATCH YOUR BACK!!!!
05-12-2011, 06:46 AM #36
Well, now we know that Apples main rule is that whatever rule they currently have can be changed at any time without further notice.
I hope the outcome of this is that more companies just give up on making business with Apple because they will never learn otherwise.
Yes, Apple, just like any other company in a capitalist world, is out to make money but to do that they need to build a level of trust between them and the developers, they are completely dependant on them after all (iOS would be nowhere if all of a sudden all developers decided to stop developing apps) and right now they are doing the opposite of that.
05-12-2011, 11:00 AM #37
I must be the odd man out, but whenever I hear about people complaining about Apple's policies, I think hey, if Apple didn't provide what it did, you wouldn't have a platform to do any of this. Ultimately it's up to Apple. They can be douches if they want to be, but isn't that up to them? They still have a large and loyal user base, so they must be doing something right.
05-12-2011, 04:40 PM #38
They will always have a loyal user base that will never change but that is not the point. It's a matter of earning more money and being top of the Market and that is where apple is slowly failing at. Many years ago Apple started with computers and was number one for a while until someone else came along and decided to do something better (Read: Better, NOT necessarily good or perfect though) and now macs have a much smaller share of them Market but that has not stopped the user base from buying them. The exact same thing is happening with iDevices where Apple keeps ignoring the user base and doing a bunch of crap until eventually they will go from having from having the Market to just that, having a user base.
What every company must remember it is not the user base that need to be thankful for the release of a product but rather the company that needs to be thankful for the user base buying and believing in their products after all, a company can do whatever they want to try and push a product to the Market but ultimately the consumer is what makes or breaks said product.
Google is very good at that, just watch the keynotes from this year I/O and count how many times they are thanking their users. I can remember 2 just of the top of my mind. Don't think google is all flowers either, if you dig deep enough you will definitely find that corporate greed that comes along with any company in a capitalist world. They just happen to be a lot better at handling their consumer base and adapting the user needs into their Market strategy rather than trying to change the user to their own needs.
The difference between Apple and Google is that Apple doesn't care about what their user base wants, their users should want what Apple wants them to have, while Google will listen to their users and then come up with products which benefits themselves while still providing some (if not all) functionality wanted by their user base.
05-12-2011, 06:43 PM #39
05-12-2011, 08:13 PM #40
There are only 6 publishers (not all, as the article states) participating in the Agency Model....out of hundreds of publishers across the US. And don't forget indie authors who self-pub through Amazon's publishing system or Pub-It! by B&N.
FYI B&N and Amazon are doing fine, even with the advent of the Agency Model. Not only have they made it possible for indie's to publish themselves, but they still sell the most ebooks - independently - over Apple. I love my iPhone and I really want an iPad, but I would never use either device to do serious reading.