Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
iPhone Newsforums, a part of the
Consider this: When you "roam" on T-Mobile's towers it definitely won't be under 3G and likely won't be under EDGE either. You will probably get GPRS service for a phone...
03-21-2011, 11:58 AM #241
Consider this: When you "roam" on T-Mobile's towers it definitely won't be under 3G and likely won't be under EDGE either. You will probably get GPRS service for a phone call or text but you won't be able to roam with data so you can't just say "there is no difference because I can roam on T-Mobile's towers when I'm not within range of an AT&T tower."
^ The first reason is because of the frequency programming of the phone, the 2nd is because of limitations imposed by both networks, and the 3rd is just for convenience.
By buying their network AT&T is strengthening their coverage in areas where T-Mobile was stronger and AT&T was weaker, they are also giving expanded coverage to places where AT&T was stronger and T-Mobile was weaker, and in areas where they were both strong the higher capacity will allow for more data usage by all the users. In places where they are both weak, there will be slight improvements which are always welcome.
03-21-2011, 12:06 PM #242
03-21-2011, 12:16 PM #243
03-21-2011, 12:17 PM #244
03-21-2011, 12:19 PM #245
03-21-2011, 12:24 PM #246
Let's be realistic, in the last 3 or 4 even 5 years T-Mobile never really was competition for AT&T in a serious way. The "competitor" has always been Verizon just like Sprint has never really been competition for Verizon in a serious way.
I don't know why most of you have been complaining about AT&T's customer service. I have never had a problem with them so I don't know where this perceived difference comes from. Perhaps you asked for something either they didn't offer or asked for something you didn't deserve and they said no and you threw a tantrum?
I had a problem with my old Palm Treo 650 back in the day where Blazer(the web browser) would stay running and eating up data and at the time I didn't have an unlimited data plan so I racked up a huge bill with data and I called them and even went as far to offer that I would uninstall Blazer to which they replied that it wouldn't be necessary and they would remove the charges and just asked me to go through it with a tech specialist which I did. He wasn't able to solve the problem but a few hours on treocentral.com helped me out and I fixed it. Either way their customer service wasn't bad. Every time I've called I have had my problems fixed one way or another.
I've never had T-Mobile but I have had Verizon and they were just the same as AT&T. Never a problem with them.
I think most of these customer service problems with AT&T are probably your fault for doing something you shouldn't have or you just weren't paying attention to your usage or something else. I've never been billed for something I didn't deserve nor have I asked for something I wasn't entitled to.
T-Mobile might have bent over more and given you more because they were more desperate for customers than AT&T and had to keep what they had so that probably gave the perception of better customer service in that they'd let you get away with a lot more and charge you less.
03-21-2011, 12:34 PM #247
^Ladies and gentlemen, my issue is NOT whether one is better (or worse) than the other. Everyone has their own opinions, their own experiences ... and that's ok.
The issue is consumers will have fewer choices. Plain and simple! Whether their choice be cost, coverage, phone, or what-ever.
The end-result is fewer choices!
Do AT&T/T-Mobile consumers really want fewer choices? I don't think so!
We want BETTER / FASTER coverage, service, etc, etc, etc. This could easily be accomplished by AT&T/T-Mobile working closer together and costing both companies a whole lot less moola
Last edited by Mes; 03-21-2011 at 12:37 PM.
03-21-2011, 01:26 PM #248
True i agreeCHAZER99
03-21-2011, 01:39 PM #249
So how is losing one company from the market losing that many choices? Why would two competing companies work together when T-mobile was never really competition in the first place? 39 billion is really not that much money considering the cost of the Bell South merger of 2006. By absorbing T-mobile instead of "working together" AT&T will both eliminate a competitor and secure the market share for AT&T. There are already tons of competitors out there. Spring, Verison, MetroPCS, US Cellular,.. just to name a few. Just because they don't have a decent market share doesn't mean they don't count.
On the flip side I do understand peoples concerns about losing the pricing options from T-Mobile and I do hope they keep those pricing options. However over the last year AT&T pricinig has gotten much better. Especially with the family plan pricing.
Trust me, there are people way above yours and my level who have thought this out financially to assess which is more cost effective and they are far better at making these assessments than any armchair CEO/CFO/CIO can possibly be.
03-21-2011, 01:41 PM #250
True, T-Mobile wasn't much of a competitor with the other carriers. Not even with Sprint. Only Verizon and AT&T has the major rivalry.CHAZER99
03-21-2011, 01:49 PM #251
At the moment, you're a unbeliever .... When it personally bites you in the back-side, then maybe you'll change your tune. Corporations primary job is to make stock-holders money. That does not always mean best for the consumer.
Fewer choices are never good for consumers.
03-21-2011, 02:01 PM #252
I'm not worried in the slightest. I'm a lot closer to this than you might think. I just don't have to wave my credentials around to try and make people see my point of view. Like I said... it's the internet where everyone is a CEO and dates supermodels. As a consumer I can guarantee you this will never bite me in the ***.
03-21-2011, 02:04 PM #253
03-21-2011, 02:06 PM #254
03-21-2011, 02:08 PM #255
^One non-consequential opinion. You fail!
Last edited by Mes; 03-21-2011 at 02:11 PM.
03-21-2011, 02:10 PM #256
03-21-2011, 02:14 PM #257
Great! Monopolistic expansion means fewer choices for consumers. Look forward to more expensive plans.
03-21-2011, 02:15 PM #258
03-21-2011, 02:16 PM #259
03-21-2011, 04:10 PM #260
If this merger happens it would make them the only GSM carrier in the USA. This move was made to set the standard for LTE pricing when it becomes widely available. If this goes through I guarantee you that VZW will most likely buyout Sprint. All it's going to take is a couple of political contributions and lining of pockets to get this to go through.
If it does go through they'll probably force AT&T to give some subscribers to another carrier along with some towers like they made Verizon do with Alltel.Android user suffering from iPhone withdraw.