Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
02-17-2011, 09:56 PM #1New York Times Squashes iPhone Nano Rumors
The New York Times said today that they have information that points to Apple not releasing an iPhone nano. In the report they reference "people who have been briefed on Apple's plans," just the next generation iPhone, expected to launch this summer.
The Times points to the fact that this 'nano' phone would not necessarily be any cheaper to produce or sell, and that a smaller screen size would make porting apps difficult. The same report also mentions something we've heard a bunch of times before, that MobileMe will be overhauled, possibly be free, and may introduce cloud syncing.
If you're unfamiliar with the many rumors regarding the presumed iPhone nano (which the Times says will never come to fruition), check out the article from a few days ago that rounds up a majority of the rumors. I've got to to side with the NY Times on this. I really don't think that Apple would be planning a phone with a different screen size, particularly for a development reason. One of Apple's biggest strengths is knowing that any app in the app store will look correct on your current device. Even when the iPhone 4 changed resolution, it was doubled exactly, allowing developers an easy time in updating their applications. Another screen size just wouldn't make sense.
02-17-2011, 09:59 PM #2
Didn't think so!
02-17-2011, 09:59 PM #3
makes sense. come to think of it now. although an iphone nano would be a hit with the girls.. iPhone 3GS 32GB . FW 4.2.1 . Black . greenpois0n .
click the "thanks" button to thank me if my post has helped u
in any way. that's the only reward i get for my effort. u may
alternatively donate to alexcdigi (at) yahoo (dot) com via paypal
to help me support my family
02-17-2011, 10:17 PM #4
I'd love to see this not happenName? whereswaldo
iDevice + Firmware? 32GB Black iPhone 4 iOS 5.0
Computer + OS? Dell Inspiron 15R 2nd Gen i5, 2.3 Ghz, 750GB HDD, 8GB RAM Windows 7 HP
Found yet? No
02-17-2011, 10:45 PM #5
It wouldn't have made any sense at all.
02-17-2011, 11:09 PM #6
I want to see an iPhone with a 5 inch retina display and edge to edge screen
02-17-2011, 11:23 PM #7
I'd rather see an iPhone Jumbo than an iPhone Nano. And no, I'm not talking about an iPad.
02-18-2011, 04:38 AM #8
02-18-2011, 05:21 AM #9
02-18-2011, 05:22 AM #10
We already knew there was going to be no new iPhone Nano.
02-18-2011, 05:36 AM #11
So should I wait to see if MobileMe will be free instead of renewing next month? That would be great if it was free. I was thinking about using googles services to keep my cash out of apples pocket.
Sent from my iPad using ModMyi
02-18-2011, 06:09 AM #12
Am I the only one who always thought that the rumored 1/3 size iPhone may have been, not referring to it's physical size, but it's storage? We all know that the memory is the biggest contributing factor to ALL iDevices' price. So by offering a phone with, let's say, 1-1.5 GB of onboard storage (enough for the iOS, contacts, cached email, SMS, and a few cached photos), apple could offer a version of the iPhone 5 at about $99.
This new bare-bones-capacity iPhone tier would then take full advantage of the rumored cloud-based mobile me update.
It is totally possible that this rumor of an iPhone that is 1/3 the size of current models, BUT the rumor mill took it as a PHYSICAL size instead of the more logical storage size.
JUST SAY'N. (if it winds up happening this summer, you heard it here first)
And no, I am not suggesting that this is going to replace the current storage tiers that are available, this will just be another, much cheaper, option.
02-18-2011, 08:04 AM #13
For once in my life I'm happy for the New York times
02-18-2011, 09:26 AM #14
Id love to have that plush iphone ^.-No confundas mi personalidad con mi actitud. Mi personalidad es quien soy yo, mi actitud depende de quien seas tú.
02-18-2011, 09:33 AM #15
why release a smaller screen when you are getting smashed with bigger and better screens like Galaxy S phones, etc.
02-18-2011, 11:31 AM #16
02-18-2011, 12:08 PM #17
Of course it would be cheaper without the bulk of the flash memory and having a smaller battery. The screen resolution could easily be the same as iPhone, iPhone 3G, and iPhone 3GS if the pixel density were slightly increased making app compatibility a non-issue. It wouldn't need to be nearly as dense as the Retina Display in part because the screen will fill more of the space on the front. If this phone truly is 1/3rd the size, we're talking volume... not screen size. Most of the volume savings would come from the thickness (thinner) and lopping-off of the Home button and empty space around the top speaker.
02-21-2011, 05:29 PM #18
02-21-2011, 10:41 PM #19