Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
Thread: Gruber vs. chpwn on Jailbreaking
08-31-2010, 12:14 PM #21
apple patches security exploits, as they should
08-31-2010, 01:14 PM #22
It's all about the business model Apple has adopted for the iDevices, that can be viewed as "an evolution" of the model used on the Macs. Oficially, Mac OS X run exclusively on Apple Hardware, and is sold with that condition implied. But on Mac OS X you can run whatever program you like, so you control your system.
iOS is an "evolved" OS, derived from Mac OS X, but you can only use whatever Apple sells to you (or you get for free at the AppStore). So Apple has the control, and profits all the way. They profit from the sale of the iDevice, from every App and from every accessory that is sold ("made for iDevices"). They also profit from the carrier agreements, either exclusive, like AT&T in not.
To make the issue a bit more complex, lets remember how iOS came to be what it is now. First, it was designed to run only the standard Apps and the "reason" was "not to interfere with the AT&T network". Jailbreaking and the initial Apps, in particular the good old "Installer" showed Apple that there was indeed another business opportunity and they reviewed their "original position" (no extra apps) by creating the AppStore.
Slowly, iOS started to peel off the layers of garbage that was introduced due to original business model suggested by AT&T. Things like Tethering, MMS, "multitasking" (I do not call that multitasking and iOS always had multitasking), etc, were slowly "introduced" as "features", and guess what, some of these features "would not run on old phones", so people would have to spend more money on a new device.
So, the bottom line is: it's all about the business model, and jailbreak is a big treat to Apples cash cow:
- They do not make money when Apps from other sources are installed;
- They do not make money on accessories if people hack their phones to allow non-sanctioned accessories to connect (without warning or error) - (require a patch);
- They do not make money when people install pirated Apps;
- They have their "partners", the developers, pressing them to prevent JB, so they also do not make money;
- Carriers also lose money, because of unlocking, and they press Apple to prevent it;
- Carriers also lose money, with tethering, unauthorized VoIP, etc, so this is another reason for pressing Apple;
Apple has enough reasons to prevent JB, and the war will continue.
BTW, if Apple as so concerned about the security of the iPhone, why they left the 2G without a patch?
The Following User Says Thank You to aviegas For This Useful Post:
08-31-2010, 01:26 PM #23
"I updated my iPhone in itunes and I cant find the Cydia app anymore and now none of my ROCK apps (gag me..) work anymore!! PLEEEEEAASEE HEEEELLLP!"
So PLEEEAASEE, if you're gonna help someone with their jailbreaking process, give them a crash course on everything and then walk them through it. Teach them the ways of the mighty Jailbreak and they will come to greatly appreciate its power. Don't do it for them.
08-31-2010, 01:59 PM #24
What are people saying apple isnt fighting it. They tried to make it illegal to do so. Make it illegal to change something you bought. hah. Its a love hate relationship they hate that people have better ideas but they love to steal the ideas from the jailbreak community. folders, backrounding (kinda), universal search, o snap wallpapers! They should be paying royalties to the developers of most of the cydia apps they ripped off!!! And oyeh the teathering option. pft apple can suck it! but i still want a new iphone haha see its all love hateHey! A Restore Never Hurts It's True!
08-31-2010, 02:07 PM #25
Apple is glad that we jailbreak.
Devs always find security holes for them. Apple goes and fixes it.
Devs create apps and tweaks that people actually want. Apple goes and creates essentially the same thing and take credit for it.
If it wasn't for jb community iPhone still wouldn't have copy/paste, mms, etc
Why would apple fight against it?
Just my 2cents.
08-31-2010, 02:09 PM #26
08-31-2010, 02:17 PM #27
To the person who responded to my reply: Apple getting a share from Cydia if they started approving jailbreaking is not like a car company asking for money from paint jobs and tweaks. Apple would be allowing a store to be on their iOS. That's more like a big business charging rent to a smaller business. Apple would be allowing them space to sell goods. That gives them the right to take a percentage from the business. Mechanic shops are not sitting on GM or Ford's property saying pay us to do this and this. Plus, mechanic shops do pay the companies sometime to put up their company names and things like that.
08-31-2010, 02:19 PM #28
in the post "nope" when he says that not allowing to downgrade to 4.0.1 because Apple only support the latest firmware version, so 4.0.2 since its the newest release..... ask millions of iphone 3g users who are not jailbroken if they would like to be able to downgrade from 4.0 to a 3.x firmware version. Im sure they would jump all over a downgrade. I think its funny that the newest and best firmware essentially ruins the user experience on these devices. Apple should be allowing these people to downgrade, instead they say they will upgrade it.... sometime in the future.
so in response to Gruber's post... there are reasons other than jailbreak that a user might want to downgrade.
08-31-2010, 02:40 PM #29
apple patches security holes, how is this wrong? It's their responsibility to ensure their product don't have any security issues even thou sometimes those holes are use for the jailbreak.
08-31-2010, 02:46 PM #30
We've heard all the arguments before...
Apple is a for profit company. They want all iphone users to purchase apps from the app store. That is their reason for locking down the iphone. Follow the money......
The Following User Says Thank You to thevmax For This Useful Post:
08-31-2010, 03:15 PM #31
It has to come down to money. Apple doesn't want you jailbreaking and getting all kinds of new apps for free. That's understandable. A flashlight app can bring in a good $.30, and when you multiply that by millions it adds up. And this is before piracy.
Of course, Apple wants to also preserve it's brand identity. If a bunch of porno apps are found by some kid playing with a jailbroken iPhone in the Apple Store, they could have a mess on their hands. No, it's a lot safer for Apple to banish jailbreaking altogether.
However, the customization options and innovation that comes out of the modding community is priceless for Apple. They model their upgrades on what jailbreakers want! Because of this, us jailbreakers are at the forefront of innovation, and we'll always be 3 steps ahead of Apple, assuming the handful of jailbreak-program writers keep up their game
08-31-2010, 03:27 PM #32
I agree... I think anything Apple does regarding the iPhone is somehow stipulated in the CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT with AT&T (which is probably bigger than a phonebook) ... Steve seems like the type to actually be delighted that there are users smart enough to use the iPhone regardless of carrier...and whatever CORPORATE decisions Apple made initially (06' or whatever) had to be purely for an influx of cash (R&D for MacBookPro's, iPads, etc. aren't free you know)
AT&T, on crutches at the time (are they off yet?), simply made a higher offer than any other phone company and, well kids, thats the way **** works in the real world.
WE see Steve on stage and THINK he's the Turtle-necked Ringleader, but true MacHeads know that the "Suit N Ties" fired his *** for "Thinking Different" before...
Make no mistake, Steve Jobs is a HACKER of the highest order and if u guys don't like what Apple or AT&T(or ANY other company) then you you should become one too...
08-31-2010, 03:56 PM #33
I agree with the article for the most part; firstly Apple should plug such large holes that are used in jailbreakme.com. Luckily the OSS community has done that for us jailbreakers, but I do believe that all userland JB's should be patched, though I agree that patching the bootloader is taking it a bit far, security vulnerability or not. As far as BL exploits go, perhaps if they were a bit harder to accomplish so that every person and their mother can do it Apple might not take such a strong stance. Fact is that since jailbreaking has become a catch phrase at this point and you have every script kiddie and newb doing it which makes it very understandable that apple doesn't want to support broken/bricked devices. Most of us here aren't going to apple when we accidentally screw our device and it won't reboot. Apple should offer a way to run unsigned code with and explicit warning as to it voiding the warranty if hardware is damaged but only if that happens. Honestly how hard is it for one of their so called "genius' " to do a restore and chances if you can't find a way to find a way to restore to stock you've got a problem in HW. Especially if Apple made the tool they wouldn't have to worry about people destroying ROMs that reside in HW unless they used some other tool but why would anyone ever even dev one if it were available by default. On top of all that security holes like the one used in jbme.com that could be used for malicious code might not ever make it to malicious eyes...or they might never be found and patched...so it's hard to say...
08-31-2010, 04:05 PM #34
I believe the true reason we jailbreak our phones is to unlock the true potential of the device. Apple knows that the iPhone is capable of so much more than they allow and like to limit the boundaries of the phone
08-31-2010, 04:09 PM #35
I think that both sides have alittle bit of the truth being said here. I stand benign
08-31-2010, 04:23 PM #36
08-31-2010, 05:20 PM #37
My opinion is I dont think Apple really cares if we jailbreak, I think there is something more to the big picture that we arent seeing, maybe something with a contract like mentioned above with ATT or even something bigger than that, MONEY, think of all the downloads off of iTunes now put all those into Cydia or Rock. Apple loses money. I seen a post somebody wrote something like this - Why would APPLE want more money Jobs is already rich. I laughed in my head. Now obviously being sarcastic wait I hope at least Now if APPLE loses money we lose cool products. Im not sure how much income APPLE receives off of iTUnes but im sure its enough to make a few iPhones or so lol.
08-31-2010, 05:56 PM #38
For everyone who has read these posts so far lemme just be the first to say STOP HERE...
I can sum up the rest of these responses: *clears throat* RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE! MY TWO UNEDUCATED CENTS; BACKED UP ONLY BY PERSONAL OPINIONS RABBLE RABBLE...
08-31-2010, 08:20 PM #39
Apple's spin-machine in full-gear. If one argument doesn't fly, try another, then another. Eventually they will find something that satisfies the fan-boys and in turn, get the 'bend-over give me more Apple can do no wrong' fan-boy support.
08-31-2010, 10:10 PM #40
Why was the exploit fixed on iOS before OSX?
If its so severe, why no fix for iPhone 2g or iPod Touch 1g?
Why did Steve Jobs call it a cat and mouse game?
They Don't Want Jailbreaking!