+ Reply
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 31 of 31

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: AT&T Working Around 3G Issues with WiFi "Hotzones"

is a discussion within the

iPhone News

forums, a part of the

General iPhone

section;
Seriously, you whiners need to grow up. First you complain that AT&T is so horrible with their speeds, their network is so over crowded and is the worst carrier YET
...
  1. #21
    iPhone? More like MyPhone jwil736's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Masshole
    Posts
    294
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 25 Times in 25 Posts

    Default Grow up
    Seriously, you whiners need to grow up. First you complain that AT&T is so horrible with their speeds, their network is so over crowded and is the worst carrier YET your still on it... (Of course speaking to most U.S. Iphone owners). Finally they are doing something to help, even if it is just a little, and you want to complain about that too!

    If you would think about it they are not trying to "band-aid" anything, they have had 4G network in test stages for over a year now and should roll out sometime late 2011, early 2012. Why would they invest any more money into a network speed, that in 2014, will basically be obsolete? Doesn't make too much sense to me as a business person... I would save all the profits I can, use the bulk of it for making a superior 4G network. Now, wouldn't that make more sense?

  2. #22
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    812
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked 147 Times in 90 Posts

    ^
    I'd like to know where you got info that AT&T has been testing their '4G' network for over a year. They can't even get 3G working correctly and they've stated they were going to start testing 4G sometime this year. AT&T is WAY behind the game. WAY behind. They know it, we know it. They aren't anywhere near close to rolling out 4G, took them how long to get mms working on the iPhone when it worked everywhere else on every other phone that was capable. Now this. They 'somehow' had a glitch that neutered the largest data using phone in their arsenal and it was an accident? More like poor planning. They can tout all the big money spending numbers they want, they got caught with their pants down and are still screwing up after 4 YEARS. How can that be acceptable? I have gotten over my AT&T problems because I got a free microcell, but that in no way means you shouldn't hold an ineptly run companies feet to the fire until they change their ways or fold. That's how things get done, accountability.

    Quote Originally Posted by iLoveWindows&iPhone View Post
    AT&T is spending billions improving their network, these wifi spots will improve 3G performance for everyone, giving AT&T the time needed to make network upgrades.
    So four years isn't enough time to spend all those billions? How much time should they be given? Ten years? Fifteen years? They need to expand their coverage rather than beef it up continuously in the 20% of the US that already have it by area.
    Last edited by KartRacer; 07-28-2010 at 05:19 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  3. #23
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    269
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by holdemdogg View Post
    What about giving 3G to the areas that only have edge instead of improving the areas that have 3G. This would equal more sales. Alot people in my area don't use smart phones because of this.
    I agree. While this is going to help a little bit it's annoying to have large areas that only have edge. I wonder how many people are going to use this though. I wouldn't like the idea of connecting to such a huge open wifi connection.

    I recently took a trip up to North Carolina and had edge almost all of the way from Alabama to North Carolina. Really the only place that had good 3g the whole trip was Atlanta.

  4. #24
    iPhone? More like MyPhone jwil736's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Masshole
    Posts
    294
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 25 Times in 25 Posts

    Default Seriously?
    AT&T will begin testing its 4G network using LTE, the same technology Verizon Wireless is using for its 4G network, starting in 2010, with a few commercial deployments ready in 2011 and more commercial deployments in 2012.
    AT&T to invest $2B in mobile network - CNN.com

    Now CNN is wrong too?

  5. #25
    Livin the iPhone Life sziklassy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Iowa (ISU for Vet School!)
    Posts
    3,920
    Thanks
    69
    Thanked 310 Times in 264 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by holdemdogg View Post
    What about giving 3G to the areas that only have edge instead of improving the areas that have 3G. This would equal more sales. Alot people in my area don't use smart phones because of this.
    How many people are in your area. Then compare how many people are in Los Angeles, Chicago, New York... get where I am going with this. Logically you want to service areas where there are more people. Let's say you live in a city of 100,000 people. Los Angeles, with their nearly 10 million, trumps your numbers 100 fold (again assuming you live in a city of 100k). THAT is why they are improving their 3G where they have it...
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I once prayed to God for an iPhone, but quickly found out He didn't work that way...so I stole an iPhone and prayed for His forgiveness.

    A dog is the only thing on earth that loves you more than you love yourself. - Josh Billings

  6. #26
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    812
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked 147 Times in 90 Posts

    ^
    That's very true, but their commercials about covering 97% of Americans is extremely disingenuous. They won't actually come out and say we don't give but those that live in or around major population areas any attention. They also sued verizon for calling them out. They also threatened a customer with a c&d. They also try and charge to use your bandwidth at home to 'provide' you a cell signal. I'd support 100 million people over 100k just like they do, but I wouldn't act like my house isn't in disarray either.

    No, CNN isn't wrong jwil736. You were by saying AT&T has been testing 4G for over a year. They haven't and aren't anywhere near close to offering that to even a handful of customers. They are scrambling to get their users 3G coverage and they are about 2-3 years late to that party and they act like nothings amiss because they are spending so much money. And I don't believe for a single second that they are spending 2 billion on wireless expansion alone. I'm betting that their entire cost for wirelss and DSL services combined, at the least. AT&T is way behind and are just looking for anything to say to cover up their ineptness at running a company for more than six months in the future. If 4G is available to more than 500k AT&T customers by this time next year I'll eat your hat. Ain't gonna happen. I'd be willing to bet that their 3G coverage is less than 20% land area in the US, while they talk the big talk about covering 97% of Americans. I've traveled from east coast to west coast five times and the coverage is an absolute joke. That's on a major interstate system too. Here in SC you can't go down 95 to Savannah and expect to get a reliable signal. Unacceptable.

    I keep AT&T because they aren't that bad overall, but they need some serious work and a change of leadership. Without the iPhone they will sink big time. The only reason that they are as big as they are is because of the iPhone. They weren't prepared for it and they are paying the price now.
    Last edited by KartRacer; 07-28-2010 at 07:43 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  7. #27
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,111
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 94 Times in 66 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Ochocinco View Post
    they are, they have spent over a billion just on the network, and window 7 phones aint going to rape the network like the iphone did
    What exactly did they spend $1 billion on? Because it seems like more people than ever are having disappointing experiences with AT&T.

  8. #28
    iPhone? More like MyPhone law111's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Redlands
    Posts
    190
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by pauldanielash View Post


    With upwards of 32 million customers nationwide with compatible smartphones or LaptopConnect cards, AT&T is pursuing the hotzone project in an effort to reduce data throughput demands on the 3G network in the busiest cities in the US.
    Through demands put on the 3g network* i think?
    iPhone Firmware - 4.1
    Service - AT&T
    Device - iPhone 4 BLACK 16GB

  9. #29
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    812
    Thanks
    72
    Thanked 147 Times in 90 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by RICO_ View Post
    What exactly did they spend $1 billion on? Because it seems like more people than ever are having disappointing experiences with AT&T.
    Paying Luke Wilson! Hahahaha

  10. #30
    Livin the iPhone Life rhekt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,294
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 65 Times in 53 Posts

    Will this work?

  11. #31
    Green Apple SoCal Railroader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Redwood Valley, Northwestern California
    Posts
    89
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22 Times in 5 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by sziklassy View Post
    How many people are in your area. Then compare how many people are in Los Angeles, Chicago, New York... get where I am going with this. Logically you want to service areas where there are more people. Let's say you live in a city of 100,000 people. Los Angeles, with their nearly 10 million, trumps your numbers 100 fold (again assuming you live in a city of 100k). THAT is why they are improving their 3G where they have it...
    You need to change your info, the REAL ISU is here, go Bengals!

    Idaho State University Idaho State University. You silly, misguided Iowans We ISU Alumni get perturbed at you guys using OUR initials Hahaha, isu.edu is ours you Corny people, muhahahah

    Back to what you were saying though, that may be true, but if Verizon can get 3G to those areas, why can't AT&T? It takes a sense of purpose, and AT&T so far hasn't shown much. Thankfully, I do have 3G near me, Ukiah, CA (9 miles south of me) is a city of 16,000 and has it, but we lucked out and AT&T Affiliate, Edge Wireless built the network out, they were officially taken over (AT&T had a 40% interest in them, they bought out the 60% that was privately held) by AT&T in April of 2008. Edge Wireless turned up 3G in many rural areas like ours across NorCal, Southern Oregon, Southeastern Idaho (Home to Pocatello, where the REAL ISU is ) and the Jackson, WY area. In NorCal, towns like Ukiah, Lakeport, Clearlake, Eureka, Arcata, Crescent City and Susanville have 3G, and GSM thanks to Edge Wireless, they cared about their bread and butter, rural and smaller towns.

    For a history of Edge Wireless- [ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edge_Wireless[/ame]
    Last edited by SoCal Railroader; 07-30-2010 at 06:23 AM.

+ Reply
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts