Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
iPhone Newsforums, a part of the
If you don't remember all the fuss about this case, you've been sleeping under a rock. This pertains to the incident of the "lost/stolen" iPhone 4 that Gizmodo had reviewed...
07-16-2010, 03:06 PM #1
Gizmodo Search Warrant Gets Pulled By Authorities
If you don't remember all the fuss about this case, you've been sleeping under a rock. This pertains to the incident of the "lost/stolen" iPhone 4 that Gizmodo had reviewed a few months back. In the slew of all this mess, editor Jason Chen of Gizmodo, had his house searched and various items seized.
The EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) says that the San Mateo County District Attorney's office has been given the opportunity to withdrawal the uber-controversial search warrant. They state that the search was indeed illegal, and violated California code.
As EFF repeatedly noted at the time, the warrant-backed search of Chen's home was illegal as it violated California Penal Code section 1524(g)'s prohibition against the issuance of warrants for "unpublished information obtained or prepared in gathering, receiving or processing of information for communication to the public."
The Wall Street Journal reports that Gizmodo has fully complied with authorities, thus making it much easier for a withdrawal of the search warrant.
The San Mateo County judge overseeing the Gizmodo case on Friday ordered the search warrant to be withdrawn and the materials taken from Mr. Chen to be returned to him. Gawker Media Chief Operating Officer Gaby Darbyshire said Gizmodo has agreed voluntarily to give the district attorney materials that a court appointee "deems relevant to the case."
Chris Feasel, deputy district attorney for San Mateo County, said Friday that the investigation into Gizmodo is ongoing. "Mr. Chen and Gizmodo have agreed to cooperate with our investigation," he said.
MacRumors & Wall Street Journal
07-16-2010, 03:08 PM #2
Well that sucks for himFIFIRI FLIES
07-16-2010, 03:11 PM #3
07-16-2010, 03:16 PM #4
Jobs thought the guy test the phone and know about "Death Grip". Want to shut Gizmo mouth regarding this issue before the release and end up losing millions of sales, so had a search done on the guy and take all evidence.
Can you imagine the loss of sales if Gizmo reported about "Death Grip" before the launch?
Now that iPhone launch is over, everyone knows about antenna issue and apparently the guy knows nothing so he let the case go.
Anyways I am sticking with my 3GS, no physical change to fix iPhone 4 = fail.
Last edited by unison999; 07-16-2010 at 03:22 PM.
The Following User Says Thank You to unison999 For This Useful Post:
07-16-2010, 03:16 PM #5
Please. Dude reveal a trade secret to the world. He knew what he was doing, Gawker knew that they were doing. What info he had wasn't his to distribute even if hadn't done so. This guy and Gawker are trying everything they can to cover their *** for doing something monumentally stupid. You can't expect to get away scot free by unveiling a product owned by a multibillion corporation entangled in a market as competitive as the mobile phone market.
07-16-2010, 03:21 PM #6
07-16-2010, 03:39 PM #7
When he gets his stuff back he should sell it or give it to friends and family. Than he will have nothing to take.
07-16-2010, 03:43 PM #8
id sue them since search violated Cali code. good thing hes getting his things back.
The Following User Says Thank You to delusion950 For This Useful Post:
07-16-2010, 03:48 PM #9
Staying with my 3G I4 needs some time
07-16-2010, 03:53 PM #10
Would have saved myself some money, because I lost all the apps I bought specifically for iPhone4...
I wonder how many people bought iphone4 and returned it, decided not to buy it again and gave up on the apps they bought for iPhone4...
07-16-2010, 04:16 PM #11
I'm surprised it's gone on this long. Glad things are easing up for him
07-16-2010, 04:28 PM #12
He must be happy.Asking for help is different from being stupid. Fanboys can rot in @#$%!
07-16-2010, 04:53 PM #13
Still a crook. Some news agencies will go to great lengths to get their sweeps. Regardless the law is the law. Even if it's a technicality. (not saying this was).
07-16-2010, 05:05 PM #14
HamburglerOriginally Posted by ??????
07-16-2010, 06:02 PM #15
07-16-2010, 06:20 PM #16
Whats the procedure for the people that already bought the bumper to have the refund? Somebody know or is not effective yet?Drive Safe with Trapster
07-16-2010, 06:47 PM #17
Glad he's getting his stuff back. I dunno why ppl are so hard on Gizmodo when many of them visit their website and were following their coverage of the found phone. Hypocrites.
07-16-2010, 06:58 PM #18
Did this iPhone have a death grip?
The Following User Says Thank You to whereswaldo For This Useful Post:
07-16-2010, 06:58 PM #19
i smell a lawsuit....
07-16-2010, 08:22 PM #20
To even imply that the information in his head wasn't his to do with as he pleased so long as it was legally obtained is ludicrous. It's like saying that no reporter can ever report something that wasn't previously known! So much for secrets and exposés! So much for rights and whistle-blowers! You should know that this law exists SPECIFICALLY to protect reporters so that they can release such information.
Last edited by CZroe; 07-16-2010 at 10:26 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost