Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 92

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Apple to Limit iPhone 4.0 Multitasking?

  1. #21
    Why are people actually content with this crippled multitasking?

    Say you're playing a game that isn't multitask-able and you're on the verge of breaking the high score, then you get an important email that you MUST read/reply. Will you still be happy with the crap that Apple calls multitasking then?

    There might be "workarounds" to this, but why create more problems when there is a simple solution? I'll probably ditch Apple's "multitask" and stick to Backgrounder if this really is the case.

  2. #22
    This is just like I told before in another article here on modmyi. They are going to limit the multitasking per device.
    Its soooo strange that Apple Cant multitask the way it should.. It just CAn but they woulnd do it. Why not just put some extra Ram in the Device and let minimal you can choose to set 5 APPS to be Backgrounded and then you can quit one and put another in his place..
    I dont think it not something they Cant do..its just they want to control the system overal..its kinda sad to see that.
    And mostly they have to disabled a lot of Languages and other stuff that really dont need to be running in the kernal or background..they take a lot of memory and process...

    1: Delete or let users select its language when setting up the phone and the rest of language will be deleted automaticly
    2:Prevent or Stop putting services that dont be needed that takes memory and processor
    3:Put more ram in the device. Ram is not so Expensive any more. the Flash memory is more Expensive than normal Memory..so why not make it 512Ram
    4: Let us choose minimal 5 Apps that we want to put in background .. we can switch between to quit and put other instead of the one
    5: JUST DO IT APPLE

  3. #23
    I dont understand why everyone get hype about all this apple talk whatever they come out with it will be restricted. They only allow you to have what they feel you need that's why video recording was so groundbreaking (to them). When they come out with new (old) tech for the iphone people go crazy and spend hundreds of dollars for something people have been doing for years. I for one don't need a ipad don't want a ipad its a oversized ipod but everybody will soak it up
    IF I HELPED PLEASE HIT THANKS

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by hollow0 View Post
    i would have to say multitasking. By default the lowest fetch time is 15mins and depending on how many accounts you have fetching wouldn't take that long. Multitasking on the other hand drains the battery a lot quicker because several apps are running at a time and using up memory at the same time. Thus, the reason why a lot of ppl complain about battery life. Some people don't understand that the more you use the phone yeah the quicker the battery will die. It's not that the batter is bad or sucks it's just that it's being used to damn much.

    I completely understand why multitasking was not implemented by 3rd party apps. The one thing that iPhone does better than a lot of phones is staying consistent with speed. No matter how many apps that are opened and closed the phone still ran smooth and quick especially 3GS. A lot of the other phones began lagging until you'd have to exit each app that is using memory. I use backgrounder and proswitcher but not all of my apps are backgrounded as there is no need. if i need an app to stay open i simply swipe up or hold the home button down for 1sec and the app is activated to remain open. I then, open up any other app i need. I would like Apple to implement something similar and i think it would help.

    I guess we'll see what happens. I'm somewhat excited but i just don't want to get my hopes up about OS 4.0. I have a bad feeling 4.0 is just going to be 3.2 in diguise.... i REALLY hope i'm wrong!

    I have to say that I run multitasking a lot with Circuitos and that thing is not draining battery as fast. I dont know why but if one guy outside appe can do this...Apple can do it 2. I run Beejive and Whatsapp mostly everyday on multitask..with also Phone and Mail app backgrounded by default.

  5. #25
    Yea just speculation people, but I can see where it's daunting. I mean, it's Apple.

    What I'm wondering is, if those multitasking capabilities are "activated" on the new iPhone, and only for a certain number of apps, could a dev possible use that to make it work system-wide? Granted it's jailbroken.
    "Thanks" button. Learn it. Use it. Love it.

  6. #26
    iPhone? More like MyPhone matthew1111's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    240
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts

    This is so we can't multitask illegal crap.
    That Thanks button is there for a reason!


  7. #27
    apple tab like multitasking would be good, as long as the switch is seamless. thats the only difference between springboard and multitasking: multitasking lets you switch apps in a fraction of a second; springboard takes 3-4 seconds to switch apps.
    Wanna-be coder/iphone user since '08

  8. #28
    CHUCK-TASTIC battlecrushr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Houston follow @al_da_beast
    Posts
    7,940
    Thanks
    273
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 956 Posts

    Nothing a jailbreak can't stop

  9. #29
    My iPhone is a Part of Me hollow0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 49 Times in 39 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by itaintrite View Post
    Why are people actually content with this crippled multitasking?

    Say you're playing a game that isn't multitask-able and you're on the verge of breaking the high score, then you get an important email that you MUST read/reply. Will you still be happy with the crap that Apple calls multitasking then?

    There might be "workarounds" to this, but why create more problems when there is a simple solution? I'll probably ditch Apple's "multitask" and stick to Backgrounder if this really is the case.
    How would you even know that the email you received is an ABSOLUTE MUST to read? Also, depending on what game you're playing if you leave the app (while still backgrounded) to enter mail and check it you would get killed in the game or whatever. Like say if you're playing DinoSmash; are you going to leave DinoSmash to check your email even if it's backgrounded? lol i f u c king think not. Not all games can be paused before exiting.

  10. #30
    so, will i be able to run books in the background?!?!

  11. #31
    CHUCK-TASTIC battlecrushr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Houston follow @al_da_beast
    Posts
    7,940
    Thanks
    273
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 956 Posts

    Wow lol haha

  12. #32
    iPhone? More like MyPhone norfskate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    138
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts

    What the hell's so wrong with Apple "controlling" the user experience?

    I work for a very large mobile retailer in the uk, and all I see day after day is people ruining there "un-controlled" phones! Whether it's over loading what their phones capable of, or having a bluetoothed corrupt file running a mock at it's own will!

    I like apples restrictions (altho their excuses are pants), we never ever get faulty iPhones handed back, just happy users :-D

    And there is always jailbreaking, mine is jailbroken, and I have things like the "backgrounder", but let's be honest, how many of us have spent hours and hours restoring iPhones because of a interfering and alien cydia app or mod?

  13. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by norfskate View Post
    (altho their excuses are pants),
    yeah man. it's totally "pants". like when my fish died, that was as pants as it gets

  14. #34
    Well said WHO the f**** wants multitasking and what you gonna achieve.
    What you wanna do like play game while watching movie or or writing a email while watching movie....

    What the f****

    listen I am an busy person, always on the run, still I don't see any use of multitasking, this is the cry started by some stupid. Compitition, who just wanna be a cry baby.
    ASK yourself how many window user actually work with 3-4 software at a time on their junky window os.
    I tried in my window laptop and what I could see a hang OS which I have to hard restart.
    I use powerful 16 GB power Mac and my new i7 with 8 GB ram, still I don't see any use of stupid multitasking.
    And I can very well understand the reason why apple is going to restrict MT, because it slow your proccessor and kill the battery.
    Now imagine apple give go ahead for all the apps MT enabled, your battery will die in few hours.
    And all the blogs will be full with complaints nothing else.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to vikas3saraswat For This Useful Post:

    Tylus (04-08-2010)

  16. #35
    Go figure apple always has to limit you on everything!

  17. #36

  18. #37
    My main use for proswitcher is switching back and forth between my shopping list and calculator. I add up my grocery bill as I shop to make sure I'm not in for a surprise at the register. Otherwise I could go without it.

  19. #38
    Appl£ Still giving people a reason to jailbreak
    Last edited by dsg; 04-07-2010 at 06:33 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

  20. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by norfskate View Post
    What the hell's so wrong with Apple "controlling" the user experience?

    I work for a very large mobile retailer in the uk, and all I see day after day is people ruining there "un-controlled" phones! Whether it's over loading what their phones capable of, or having a bluetoothed corrupt file running a mock at it's own will!

    I like apples restrictions (altho their excuses are pants), we never ever get faulty iPhones handed back, just happy users :-D

    And there is always jailbreaking, mine is jailbroken, and I have things like the "backgrounder", but let's be honest, how many of us have spent hours and hours restoring iPhones because of a interfering and alien cydia app or mod?
    So if your phone runs fine jailbroken then you see what i was saying about being restricted. If they would get off there high horses and listen to it's customers and give us what we want then we would not need a jailbreak that bad. But to give us something then restrict it for your own reasoning it's not fair to the consumer.
    IF I HELPED PLEASE HIT THANKS

  21. #40
    If so how can jailbroken iphones multi task without any problem?

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •