Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.
iPhone Newsforums, a part of the
12-04-2009, 02:52 PM #1
Apple Gets Sued by St. Clair: "Infringes" on Four Ridiculous Digital Camera Patents
It appears that nothing changes over at Apple Legal. Yet again they are being sued, this time by a company called St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants. They claim that Apple's iPhone infringes on four digital camera patents that the company holds. The four include the ‘459, ‘219, ‘010 and ‘899 patents.
459: Take image contained within lens and store in some type of memory.
219: Display the picture that will be taken in some type of display window.
010: Push button in order to capture image.
899: Make images contained within some type of memory and make them viewable in some sort of digital camera roll.
It appears St. Clair has been playing this game of patent infringement lawsuit for quite some time. In 2001, it sued Sony for infringing these same patents and won a $25 million judgement against the company. In 2003, it sued Canon and was awarded $34 million in damages. This just absolutely blows my mind. Not only are they playing this ridiculous game, they are actually winning! WTF!?
Since they've decided to play this game, St. Clair has filed suit against every major camera maker in the entire world including Fuji, Minolta, Kyocera, Nikon, Casio and Olympus. It also filed lawsuits against Samsung, Nokia, Panasonic, LG, Kodak, HP, Motorola, RIM and Palm, and the list goes on.
I don't know about you, but I'm getting really tired of this crap. This company can't even make it on it's own without stabbing every single company in the back and taking their moola.
Here is a list of St Clair Intellectual Property - Justia Federal District Court Filings and Dockets
Last edited by Nick Hesson; 12-04-2009 at 03:31 PM.
12-04-2009, 02:54 PM #2
wow this can be interesting!
No again apple
(the only reason im commenting is so some retard doesnt say "FIRST" lol
12-04-2009, 03:00 PM #3
12-04-2009, 03:00 PM #4
12-04-2009, 03:01 PM #5
I'm assuming that they're going to start suing Webcam makers next, seeing that they also do still images as well as video. They're going to make a lot of money, too bad I didn't make a patten on some sort of lever that moves ~1 gallon of water through a ceramic/porcelain bowl to move excrements through a tubing system!!
12-04-2009, 03:07 PM #6
12-04-2009, 03:08 PM #7
Things just keep looking up for the ol' Apple!
Hey does anybody think AT&T could get dragged into the lawsuit? That would be hella cool!
12-04-2009, 03:10 PM #8
12-04-2009, 03:10 PM #9
I bet their business isn't actually in making a unique product, but instead they make their money off of patents. Wait, maybe they'll soon get sued by IBM! Yeah, IBM filed for a patent that patents the idea of making patents to make money (i.e. you get a patent just to sue other companies for patent infringement). What a load of ******** the whole patent industry is becoming. Most of the individuals who have good ideas and patent them don't ever win their case when they find someone using their idea, and yet people who make retarded patents like this win??? Wow I sure hope the supreme court makes a decision on patents that will take out some of the stupidity.
12-04-2009, 03:19 PM #10
wow, time to start patenting a ton of stupid crap and get rich off it..lolIf I was any help, please hit the thanks button...
12-04-2009, 03:21 PM #11
12-04-2009, 03:21 PM #12
12-04-2009, 03:21 PM #13
12-04-2009, 03:47 PM #14
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Probably a company that puts out a lot of patents, and when something sounds like theirs they sue.
12-04-2009, 04:31 PM #15
I don't see what they did wrong. I mean, it seems they came up with a lot of the ideas of the digital camera and patented it, meaning that no one else could use it without their permission. Now that they did use it, they're suing the companies after they've made some money. Yes, it's true that every digital camera uses it, but it seems all of them are violating the patent which is wrong since they own them. We just don't see this as a crime to break the patent since it's so normal for a camera to do all these things, but it's only because that it's been a lot of years.
12-04-2009, 04:34 PM #16
12-04-2009, 05:15 PM #17
Putting someone elses idea in your hardware and then getting sued by them. Sounds familiar. (PLYSTAR) Apple what goes around comes around.
12-04-2009, 05:36 PM #18
Maybe I should file a patent on how to file patents on stupid stuff and use that to sue big companies and then I can turn around and sue these idiots that sue for this stupid **** for a living.
12-04-2009, 05:49 PM #19
Bull****! The company wants money! I wish that company can go to ****!!Asking for help is different from being stupid. Fanboys can rot in @#$%!
12-04-2009, 05:51 PM #20