[ajl917]

There is no way that an iPhone model that costs less than the iPhone 3G will have more features. Apple always gives the iPhone the good features first...

[sziklassy]

Originally Posted by ajl917

There is no way that an iPhone model that costs less than the iPhone 3G will have more features. Apple always gives the iPhone the good features first...

I agree, you are probably right, but just for the sake of arguement...

the ipod nano technically has more features than the ipod classic and is cheaper

[ajl917]

Muahaha, I was right! No iPhone Nano at least for now...

[.:MirrorminD:.]

The iphone Nano is just a bad idea and pretty stupid imo. I just dont see how it would be functional with a touch screen on a smaller screen then what about typing an email - it would be nearly impossible.

[n00neimp0rtant]

About that screenshot...why would Apple suddenly capitalize "nano"?

[confucious]

Why are people still discussing a non-event? Like I said before, it was a typo in an advert and never an 'idea' at all.

But I still want an iPhone shuffle....

[ajl917]

Originally Posted by IndianCheese

About that screenshot...why would Apple suddenly capitalize "nano"?

There is more proof in that screenshot; look at the shadow, if the iPhone Nano option wasnt there, it would line up, but as you can see, it dosent line up. Another attempt at a fake gone terribly wrong...

[Melech518]

Nano iPhone??? why haha, I would never want this.

[confucious]

Do you enjoy reviving 6 month old threads to post your cr*p?
Given up posting your lies on the dev team blog and thought you'd come and abboy us here instead?
Why don't you cral back under your stone and get yourself a n*kia.

[theREALpeter]

iPhone Nano...

They would name it iPhone 4..

[iGrime]

No... They Making Things Even Worst!! Stop It Making So Many Makings On iPhone..!! Apple Becoming An S*it out-coming!! STOP IT!! iPhone 3G S Its the Same As iPhone 3G Got Both And Both Are Getting No Changes!! Am Hoping To Sell Both And Go Back To Sony!!