+ Reply
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Podcaster Blocked From Distribution Outside App Store

is a discussion within the

iPhone News

forums, a part of the

General iPhone

section;
When Alex Sokirynsky's Podcaster App was rejected from the AppStore by Apple because "... Podcaster assists in the distribution of podcasts, it duplicates the functionality of the Podcast section of
...
  1. #1
    Owner / Founder - ModMyi
    aka cash7c3
    Cody Overcash's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    11,893
    Thanks
    340
    Thanked 15,273 Times in 652 Posts

    Default Podcaster Blocked From Distribution Outside App Store
    When Alex Sokirynsky's Podcaster App was rejected from the AppStore by Apple because "... Podcaster assists in the distribution of podcasts, it duplicates the functionality of the Podcast section of iTunes," Sokirynsky came up with a solution: distribute Podcaster via ad-hoc.



    It was good while it lasted but now Apple has shut that down as well. Originally Sokirynsky was able to create new sets of Podcaster 100 at a time to send out to whomever donated $10. Apple apparently doesn't like that business plan much and has removed the "remove device" link in Sokirynsky's account on the Apple developer website. Clicking that link is one of the necessary steps to get a new set of Podcaster out the gates and into donators hands.

    For now Sokirynsky believes that all the previously distributed versions of Podcaster will still work so users that donated and received a copy wont be SOL. Sokirynsky also plans on making an update and distributing to all of those that purchased a copy of Pocaster after he tests it on his personal phone -- he does warn to keep a copy of version 1.0.8b just in case.

    The future of Podcaster is looking grim as far as the AppStore goes but it doesn't appear that the app is going away any time soon. Sokirynsky plans on making Podcaster for the Andriod platform and is also looking into the possibly of bringing Podcaster to Jailbroken iPhones.

  2. #2
    Previously Known as A.T MetallicaFan1991's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    1,582
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked 111 Times in 94 Posts

    There's so many calculator and weather apps. I'm sure they're duplicating the "Calculator" and "Weather" app aswell, aren't they??

    MBP 15" 2.66Ghz Core 2 Duo Nvidia 9400M 9600GT 256MB OS X 10.6.4 Windows 7 June 2009
    iPhone 4 August 28th

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetallicaFan1991 For This Useful Post:

    ksong12 (09-23-2008), Metallica (09-23-2008)

  4. #3
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    325
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 43 Times in 32 Posts

    True dat.
    If you like or found helpful anything I have said, please click that nice little Thanks button!

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to ksong12 For This Useful Post:

    Metallica (09-23-2008)

  6. #4
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    813
    Thanks
    417
    Thanked 108 Times in 80 Posts

    so if you can get podcasts on itunes, what the he11 is the point in this app?
    itunes charges and this only requires one time fee?
    news?

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to tattoojack For This Useful Post:

    Metallica (09-23-2008)

  8. #5
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    This app allows to get podcast over the air, without needing to sync

  9. #6
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts

    Default expected
    Quite frankly he should have expected this to happen. It was a flagrant abuse of the ad-hoc distribution method. If he really wanted to continue selling his app he should come up with a trial version and sell it to users with jailbroken phones.

    Attempting to get around Apple's ban on the app only ensures that none of this guys future apps are ever going to get certified and makes it less likely that Apple would reverse their decision at all.

  10. #7
    Retired Moderator one1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    In my own little world
    Posts
    10,318
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 1,180 Times in 730 Posts

    iTunes created the podcast!!!!! Without iTunes there would be no podcasters!!!! Apple owns every pod cast ever made and everyone who makes pod casts!!!! There was certainly no such thing as podcast before itunes!!!

    Are you thinking of making a Podcast? Well you thought it, too late now Apple owns you TOO!!!



    F'kers..............
    Screw #Winning, I'm #Juanning
    iMac 27" i5 quad 2.8Ghz (1TB), MacBook Pro 17" 2.6, iPhone 4s

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to one1 For This Useful Post:

    tattoojack (09-23-2008)

  12. #8
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    341
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts

    Default Um no
    Quote Originally Posted by one1 View Post
    iTunes created the podcast!!!!! Without iTunes there would be no podcasters!!!! Apple owns every pod cast ever made and everyone who makes pod casts!!!! There was certainly no such thing as podcast before itunes!!!

    Are you thinking of making a Podcast? Well you thought it, too late now Apple owns you TOO!!!



    F'kers..............
    Apple just coined podcast, podcast are just anualy updated sound files or videos, nothing new.

    Also most podcast arent on itunes, you can download them on the makers website. Itunes has no rite to own all the podcast or podcasters they didnt even trademark the term.

    and just so you no most itunes podcast are free, the point of this app is to sync on the air.

  13. #9
    Retired Moderator one1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    In my own little world
    Posts
    10,318
    Thanks
    349
    Thanked 1,180 Times in 730 Posts

    Damn newb, don't look too far past sarcasm you'll hurt yourself.
    Screw #Winning, I'm #Juanning
    iMac 27" i5 quad 2.8Ghz (1TB), MacBook Pro 17" 2.6, iPhone 4s

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to one1 For This Useful Post:

    darwina (09-24-2008), tattoojack (09-23-2008)

  15. #10
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    813
    Thanks
    417
    Thanked 108 Times in 80 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by one1 View Post
    Damn newb, don't look too far past sarcasm you'll hurt yourself.
    lmao, owned.

    one1, doesnt it seem like lately the mmi forum is more like the navy recruiters station.

    we get sophomoric newbs more and more everyday!!!!

  16. #11
    What's Jailbreak? kelticfury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    This just makes me want this app more every time I hear about it. I don't even watch/listen to podcasts.

    Negative publicity FTW.

  17. #12
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    He should make it available to jailbroken iphones. I'm sure people will donate.

  18. #13
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    81
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts

    Default I don't know how they can get away with it...
    What get's me is how is it legal for Apple to restrict users from utilizing the capabilities of the hardware with flagrantly anti-competitive practices? They build a phone that has certain capabilities, running software, hardware capabilities, etc. Then they restrict your rights to use those capabilities you paid for to only applications that do not take away from their own revenue streams.

    They do NOT own the device you purchased.

    Isn't this considered anti-competitive?

    I know this has been asked a million times before and debated to high heaven, but it just strikes me as strange that they can do this.

    Microsoft was called to task many times for the same kinds of things in Windows, such as adding code that made competitor browsers now function correctly, and hiding the fact. How is this any different?

  19. #14
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by santiagodraco View Post
    What get's me is how is it legal for Apple to restrict users from utilizing the capabilities of the hardware with flagrantly anti-competitive practices? They build a phone that has certain capabilities, running software, hardware capabilities, etc. Then they restrict your rights to use those capabilities you paid for to only applications that do not take away from their own revenue streams.

    They do NOT own the device you purchased.

    Isn't this considered anti-competitive?

    I know this has been asked a million times before and debated to high heaven, but it just strikes me as strange that they can do this.

    Microsoft was called to task many times for the same kinds of things in Windows, such as adding code that made competitor browsers now function correctly, and hiding the fact. How is this any different?

    It isn't. Try asking Verizon to add many, many Bluetooth features to simple phones like the LG Shine. They use the same principle. If they can make money on it, nobody else should. (I'm mainly referring to the BT Push Object.)


    -J

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts