+ Reply
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 42

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Apple CAN Kill Confirmed by Steve

is a discussion within the

iPhone News

forums, a part of the

General iPhone

section;
Originally Posted by robbpell i dont see why people are so pissed about this they havent used it to remove the apps that where taken off so it is obviously
...
  1. #21
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by robbpell View Post
    i dont see why people are so pissed about this they havent used it to remove the apps that where taken off so it is obviously a safety feature i hope someone comes up with a hack to disable it that way all you ppl that are so worried will have all there information stolen when a real malicious app comes out and stays on your phone
    Indeed people! Don't go all in panic mode now cos u discovered this!

    This feature is here only to protect u, I am sure that Apple will never ever use it unless there is a real need to use it, so please calm down, and be happy that Apple is here to protect us (if necessary)!

  2. #22
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    139
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Hackers will save us. Humans created software and hardware so other humans can advance and recreate something from it. Whether it's a fix, modification, or exploit, we will find a way to bypass it. Besides the best hackers could help us but probably don't give a crap about things like this. Probably a waste of their time haha. We'll bypass this no worries.

  3. #23
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    400
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts

    Just add to the bottom line?
    edit: My phone is still running fine, but is this where it was supposed to go? was hoping for an answer
    Last edited by Muggz5; 08-15-2008 at 12:00 AM.

  4. #24
    My iPhone is a Part of Me lightmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    589
    Thanks
    174
    Thanked 165 Times in 112 Posts

    That is way to "Big Brother" for me. What's next, being able to kill iPhones and iTouchs that are jailbroken?
    "In computer networking, a Media Access Control address (MAC address) is a unique identifier assigned to most network adapters or network interface cards (NICs) by the manufacturer for identification, and used in the Media Access Control protocol sub-layer." (1)

    "The Macintosh, or Mac, is a series of several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc." (2)



  5. #25
    iPhone? More like MyPhone Carlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    100
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

    Okay call me foolish but im not scared of this kill thing, seems like the hackers are always out thinking apple anyways so everytime apple trys to stop something there is always some smarter

    Im on the Hackers Side, I feel once you buy a piece of equipment its your to do what you want!!

    MMI lover......no homo!
    King Los aka Los Ninyo

  6. #26
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Bismarck
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Noob question...
    Is Apple's "call home" function on the iPod Touch as well?
    I am guessing that it is.

    ...and doesn't Apple's remote url interfere with the privacy act in some way?
    I mean searching peoples homes without their consent is illegal, so shouldn't searching peoples phones be in the same boat?
    Last edited by MutherFOO; 08-14-2008 at 11:38 PM.

  7. #27
    My iPhone is a Part of Me lightmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    589
    Thanks
    174
    Thanked 165 Times in 112 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by MutherFOO View Post
    Noob question...
    Is Apple's "call home" function on the iPod Touch as well?
    I am guessing that it is.
    Yes, it is on the iTouch as well. Most functions and stuff that is on the iPhone is also on the iTouch, except, of course, the actual phone part and the EDGE/3G network.

    Quote Originally Posted by MutherFOO View Post
    ...and doesn't Apple's remote url interfere with the privacy act in some way?
    I mean searching peoples homes without their consent is illegal, so shouldn't searching peoples phones be in the same boat?
    Knowing Apple and all other phone manufacturers, the will probably come up with an excuse along the lines of "We're letting the people who have spent so much money on our products 'borrow' our iPhones and iTouches, not actually 'own' them." I know it will be a BS answer from Apple, but they can pull it off. Plus, I doubt that Steve Jobs would publicly announce the "Call Home" "feature" if they didn't have a valid excuse.


    A question of my own, for iPhone users who have to pay a pretty hefty charge for EDGE/3G network usage, if and when Steve Jobs places an app on his blacklist, will it use the EDGE/3G network and cost you money, or will it only happen when your using WIFI?
    "In computer networking, a Media Access Control address (MAC address) is a unique identifier assigned to most network adapters or network interface cards (NICs) by the manufacturer for identification, and used in the Media Access Control protocol sub-layer." (1)

    "The Macintosh, or Mac, is a series of several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc." (2)



  8. #28
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Bismarck
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by lightmaster View Post
    Knowing Apple and all other phone manufacturers, the will probably come up with an excuse along the lines of "We're letting the people who have spent so much money on our products 'borrow' our iPhones and iTouches, not actually 'own' them." I know it will be a BS answer from Apple, but they can pull it off. Plus, I doubt that Steve Jobs would publicly announce the "Call Home" "feature" if they didn't have a valid excuse.
    Well I'm guessing that Apple stated their "Call Home" feature somewhere in the long as$ "Read the following before excepting to the terms of use" BOOOOOOOOOK!!!, which NO ONE EVER READS, we all just click "Accept", So we will never know, LOL.

    But, you do have an excellent point on if they announced it they must have a excuse.

    Quote Originally Posted by lightmaster View Post
    A question of my own, for iPhone users who have to pay a pretty hefty charge for EDGE/3G network usage, if and when Steve Jobs places an app on his blacklist, will it use the EDGE/3G network and cost you money, or will it only happen when your using WIFI?
    Well, I'm not a iPhone user myself, I would like to be but not a single iPhone is soled in a 674.4 mile radius of my town, plus there is not a single AT&T tower even remotely close but there is a T-Mobile tower so there is small shinning gleam of hope for me to get an iPhone. LOL:P
    Anyways, I'm sure that Apple could blacklist apps for free over EDGE/3G.
    Last edited by MutherFOO; 08-15-2008 at 09:48 AM.

  9. #29
    Livin the iPhone Life Happy Noodle Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Earth.
    Posts
    2,370
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 463 Times in 270 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by lightmaster View Post
    Knowing Apple and all other phone manufacturers, the will probably come up with an excuse along the lines of "We're letting the people who have spent so much money on our products 'borrow' our iPhones and iTouches, not actually 'own' them." I know it will be a BS answer from Apple, but they can pull it off. Plus, I doubt that Steve Jobs would publicly announce the "Call Home" "feature" if they didn't have a valid excuse.
    That's pretty much what it is now. It's all in the contract (a fun read if you're bored on a weekend). I still think people are over-reacting over this. They already do a general good job on approving/denying apps before they hit the store. In case, something slips by (Aurora Feint not encrypting contacts when sending them), they just remove from the store and it spreads out pretty quick why they did. All this really does is keep Apple safe from a lawsuit if an app does try to kill your phone / sell your contact information without letting you know.

    I honestly don't see them using this ever.

    I'm a helpful jerk, fear me.

  10. #30
    My iPhone is a Part of Me lightmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    589
    Thanks
    174
    Thanked 165 Times in 112 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Happy Noodle Boy View Post
    That's pretty much what it is now. It's all in the contract (a fun read if you're bored on a weekend). I still think people are over-reacting over this. They already do a general good job on approving/denying apps before they hit the store. In case, something slips by (Aurora Feint not encrypting contacts when sending them), they just remove from the store and it spreads out pretty quick why they did. All this really does is keep Apple safe from a lawsuit if an app does try to kill your phone / sell your contact information without letting you know.
    I completely agree, it has the potential to be incredible good for all parties concerned, but, just like Spiderman, "With great power comes great responsibility" and in the ancient Latin proverb, "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" or, for those of you who don't speak Latin, "Who will guard the guards themselves." Apple may have the ability to kill malicious apps that somehow make there way into the AppStore and onto your iPhone/iTouch, but does that same power enable them to kill apps that you get through Cydia and Installer? And what happens if a serious bug occurs in your favorite paid app [insert app name here] and Apple kills the app and removes it from the AppStore permanently, what is to stop them from keeping your money that you spent on the app and refusing to give you a refund or store credit? I think most people are probably more worried about Apple being able to walk away with their money than they are worried about malicious apps getting on their iPhone/iTouch.

    Also, just like the issue with the government being able to intercept any phone call or radio wave, people are worried about their privacy being violated and sometimes, actually most of the times, they miss the point that Apple and the government are trying to protect us, from terrorist using cell phones to call each other and from malicious apps that may mess up your iPhone/iTouch.

    Now, don't get me wrong, I don't like that Apple didn't make this "Call Home" function more obvious from the start, but I see no reason in worrying about it or trying to turn it off unless someone finds evidence of Apple abusing this function. If someone does come forward with evidence of Apple killing their app for no real reason, then I'll be first in line to get this function turned off.
    Last edited by lightmaster; 08-15-2008 at 06:56 PM.
    "In computer networking, a Media Access Control address (MAC address) is a unique identifier assigned to most network adapters or network interface cards (NICs) by the manufacturer for identification, and used in the Media Access Control protocol sub-layer." (1)

    "The Macintosh, or Mac, is a series of several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc." (2)



  11. #31
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    400
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts

    Well yes its a bit of paranoia, but in the same respect I dont download anything without reading about it first. Id just rather not install something until its proven to work and be a legitimate application. So the use for this "KillSwitch" so to speak is not really neccessary. I embrace the fact our government is involved, and unless you are doing something illegal who cares if the government is listening/watching? They do protect us, and for the most part The Patriot Act was a step int he right direction. The only issue with this is its harder to get mandatory State/Federal licenses, permits, and day to day things done, etc. (you get my point) But since we are technically "breaking the law" with our phones by jailbreaking, unlocking, Id rather have less and less communication with Apple.

  12. #32
    My iPhone is a Part of Me lightmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    589
    Thanks
    174
    Thanked 165 Times in 112 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Muggz5 View Post
    So the use for this "KillSwitch" so to speak is not really neccessary. I embrace the fact our government is involved, and unless you are doing something illegal who cares if the government is listening/watching? They do protect us, and for the most part The Patriot Act was a step int he right direction.
    If your referring to my last post, I wasn't saying that the government is or isn't involved, I was referencing the governments ability to bypass the Patriot's Act and listen to our conversations if its in the name of our protections, and I was comparing that to Apple's new ability to peek into our iPhones/iTouches. It was only a comparison. As far as I know, the government isn't involved in anyway. Sorry about the confusion.
    "In computer networking, a Media Access Control address (MAC address) is a unique identifier assigned to most network adapters or network interface cards (NICs) by the manufacturer for identification, and used in the Media Access Control protocol sub-layer." (1)

    "The Macintosh, or Mac, is a series of several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc." (2)



  13. #33
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    400
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by lightmaster View Post
    If your referring to my last post, I wasn't saying that the government is or isn't involved, I was referencing the governments ability to bypass the Patriot's Act and listen to our conversations if its in the name of our protections, and I was comparing that to Apple's new ability to peek into our iPhones/iTouches. It was only a comparison. As far as I know, the government isn't involved in anyway. Sorry about the confusion.

    Indeed Im not saying either of the 2 are related, and was simply supporting your comments and giving my take on them. Also giving my point of view as far as what this "killswitch" means to me. The big brother thing is stupid, Im just saying the less they know about my phone and how I use it the better. Unless they plan on enabling all GSM carriers and need more input to make a better phone.

  14. #34
    iPhone? More like MyPhone Travace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    175
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 18 Times in 9 Posts

    they are just covering thier own asses.

    if someone sneaks a malicious app into the store.. or something that is illegal they need a feature like this to take care of it for the people who already got the malicious or illegal stuff on their iphones.

    I know for hackers this is Bad News but for Apple its a pretty smart way to cover their ***.

  15. #35
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts

    Lol actually they would give you your money back. Your purchase transaction occurs through your iTunes account. It isn't hard for apple to merely refund everyone, because they have your credit information, all refunds would be done through a single run, just by a simple scan to detect the apps removed from which users then just refunded with a click... Refunding apps in that case is not a big problem for apple, it is there responsibility that they inspect apps before released, so what ever money they lose by having to recall that app it is their own fault.

  16. #36
    Green Apple Macboy67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Los angeles, CA
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Don't you have to SSH into your iPhone to disable that????

  17. #37
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    ha so many people said it dosen't not this proves that is does

  18. #38
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    400
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 47 Times in 43 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Macboy67 View Post
    Don't you have to SSH into your iPhone to disable that????
    yes.

  19. #39
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    has the step by step process been comfirmed yet.? it is stated "add the following entry into /etc/hosts:" where is this step located? Is it in pnwange when one builds a new image?

  20. #40
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    163
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts

    I think our governent set a bad precedent, and now we will all suffer from corporate phishing. They only have been wanting to this since the beggining of the twisted pair.

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts