Results 1 to 17 of 17

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Proview Back With New Allegations Against Apple in Court

  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Michael Essany's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana
    Posts
    3,848
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 1,481 Times in 567 Posts

    Default Proview Back With New Allegations Against Apple in Court


    Providing more fodder for what is quickly becoming the Silicon Valley equivalent of a daytime soap opera, Proview - the Chinese company that claims rightful ownership of the iPad moniker - is blasting Apple in court yet again.

    I mean, you didn't think this saga was over yet, did you?

    After a seesaw legal battle that shifts momentum in opposite directions as the wind blows, Apple remains in virtual no danger of losing the rights to sell the iPad in China. But that isn't going to stop Proview from pursuing every legal channel possible to apparently get something out of Apple.

    As we understand it, today Proview revised its California lawsuit against the iPad maker to reflect the latest accusation against the Cupertino-based tech juggernaut. The new allegations state that Apple has engaged in full-blown fraud and other practices that wreak of unfair competition.

    The intricacies of the new accusations are steeped in enough boring details and jargon to put a Supreme Court justice to sleep. But suffice it to say that Proview is now saying that the steps Apple took to secure the rights to use the iPad name in China were slapdash and shady.

    Proview has even retained the services of a New York-based public relations firm to handle the company's public statements, the latest of which reads: "The complaint provides evidence that the December 23, 2009 agreement that Proview Taiwan entered into was fraudulently induced by the concealment and suppression of material facts by Apple's agents, and that, as a result, the 2009 agreement is void... Once the agreement is voided for fraud, the iPad trademarks in the European Union, South Korea, Mexico, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam will revert back to Proview Taiwan."

    Source: Los Angeles Times

  2. #2
    Livin the iPhone Life steve-z17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,266
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 146 Times in 124 Posts

    Give it up Proview, you're just in it for the money, you could care less about the name...

  3. #3
    iPhone? More like MyPhone GooseG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Utah :\
    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Japs just never quit.

    P.S. I realize their Chinese. Humor me.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bklyn NY !!
    Posts
    913
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked 62 Times in 51 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-z17 View Post
    Give it up Proview, you're just in it for the money, you could care less about the name...
    that's the same lie that was told about the iPhone name and iCloud. when apple decided it was ok to steal. seems like anything with an "i" at the beginning belongs to apple regardless of how old the trademark is or what its being used for.

    Proview will win in China but loose in the US.

  5. #5
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,149
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by GooseG View Post
    Japs just never quit.

    P.S. I realize their Chinese. Humor me.


    I see the humor in there, but its not what you wanted.
    That would be "they are" or "they're".

    Quote Originally Posted by jOnGarrett View Post
    that's the same lie that was told about the iPhone name and iCloud. when apple decided it was ok to steal. seems like anything with an "i" at the beginning belongs to apple regardless of how old the trademark is or what its being used for.
    Pretty soon Will-I-Am will have to change to Will-Am to avoid litigation by Apple.
    Last edited by unison999; 02-27-2012 at 05:19 PM.

  6. #6
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Apple sucks. Rooting for Proview.

  7. #7
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,149
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-z17 View Post
    Give it up Proview, you're just in it for the money, you could care less about the name...
    Proview would not have sold the name to Apple if they knew Apple was using it for iPad device, they may have leased the name to Apple but would not have sold it. Apple knows this and purposely say they are using it for "IP Application Development (IPAD)", now if Proview had a competent lawyer they would put in a none-competitive clause in the sales contract, the judge have no way to protect Apple and have to side with Proview.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by lfecefl View Post
    Apple sucks. Rooting for Proview.
    I hope their claims against apple was submitted on sharp cornered sheets of paper with ugly type fonts. i''d hate for apple to turn around and sue proview for violating any patents realed to round edges are pretty fonts. Then again doesnt apple already have a patent that allows them to sue everyone else for good ideas? Since suing apple was a good idea and apple has the patents on good ideas apple should sue proview for suing apple!

  9. #9
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,149
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkflame View Post
    I hope their claims against apple was submitted on sharp cornered sheets of paper with ugly type fonts. i''d hate for apple to turn around and sue proview for violating any patents realed to round edges are pretty fonts. Then again doesnt apple already have a patent that allows them to sue everyone else for good ideas? Since suing apple was a good idea and apple has the patents on good ideas apple should sue proview for suing apple!
    ^^iChuckled <- oh oh I better watch out! Apple is now coming for me.

    No worries, they filled out their papers in Legal Size document with sharp corners

    Quote Originally Posted by unison999 View Post
    ^^iChuckled <- oh oh I better watch out! Apple is now coming for me.

    No worries, they filled out their papers in Legal Size document with sharp corners
    BTW iChuckled is now TM (trademarked) and copyrighted!! Apple better not get any ideas.
    Last edited by unison999; 02-27-2012 at 06:50 PM.

  10. #10
    iPhone? More like MyPhone GooseG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Utah :\
    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    [QUOTE=unison999;6427409]
    That would be "they are" or "they're".

    True.

  11. #11
    The old guy probably said hey I've been going thru these old documents and that was apple that bought the iPad name from us, eew they have billions, them dirty rotten man we could of made a hell of a lot more then that. They committed fraud cause we could of got more money if we would of known it was apple! Well guess what proview GO XXXX YOURSELF apple had a legal company buy the name from u! Do u think if apple went out trying to buy the iPad name in their name 1. They would get screwed 2. People would be tipped off on a new product! The only fraud here is proview trying to screw apple out of billions! Ah guess what no chance!

  12. #12
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,149
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by trialnterror View Post
    The old guy probably said hey I've been going thru these old documents and that was apple that bought the iPad name from us, eew they have billions, them dirty rotten man we could of made a hell of a lot more then that. They committed fraud cause we could of got more money if we would of known it was apple! Well guess what proview GO XXXX YOURSELF apple had a legal company buy the name from u! Do u think if apple went out trying to buy the iPad name in their name 1. They would get screwed 2. People would be tipped off on a new product! The only fraud here is proview trying to screw apple out of billions! Ah guess what no chance!


    Now that would depend if there is a no-competitive clause they put into the contract for the sale of ipad, if they did Apple deserve to get screwed by Proview. The fact Apple made up the name "ip application development" is an obvious attempt to mislead Proview, and by not disclosing what the name was for Apple can also lose the case due to false pretenses.
    Just like you got a neighbor who has Micky Mantle baseball card in mint condition worth $2500+, because you know he does not know the value you made an offer of $1 for the card and he sold it to you. In many states around the country, the guy is entitled to get the card back.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by lfecefl View Post
    Apple sucks. Rooting for Proview.
    Great opinion and really adds to the debate. Anyway If they suck why are you on an apple related forum? I don't go onto android / windows phone based forums and troll there.

  14. #14
    My iPhone is a Part of Me TheDirtyDiddler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    530
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 53 Times in 37 Posts

    I don't think it was so much an attempt to fool Proview as it was an attempt to keep their product line a secret. You know how Apple is. And if Proview isn't holding up their end of the bargain then Apple will have paid them for nothing. If they want the rights to the name back, then they should pay back all the money they got from Apple to obtain it. They received that money to give up the name, and that's exactly what happened. I don't see how it even matters WHO it was. It's been paid for.
    Last edited by TheDirtyDiddler; 02-28-2012 at 01:22 AM.

  15. #15
    Isnt everyone just in it for the money? I sure as hell dont go to work because its fun.

  16. #16
    Livin the iPhone Life steve-z17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    2,266
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 146 Times in 124 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by jOnGarrett View Post
    that's the same lie that was told about the iPhone name and iCloud. when apple decided it was ok to steal. seems like anything with an "i" at the beginning belongs to apple regardless of how old the trademark is or what its being used for.

    Proview will win in China but loose in the US.
    Like I said, they're just in it for the money...

  17. #17
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,149
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDirtyDiddler View Post
    I don't think it was so much an attempt to fool Proview as it was an attempt to keep their product line a secret. You know how Apple is. And if Proview isn't holding up their end of the bargain then Apple will have paid them for nothing. If they want the rights to the name back, then they should pay back all the money they got from Apple to obtain it. They received that money to give up the name, and that's exactly what happened. I don't see how it even matters WHO it was. It's been paid for.
    Unfortunately because the original corporate name they used to buy the name IPAD for is so misleading, the courts will have to side with Proview especially if they have the no-competitive clause in the sales contract. Even if the clause is not there (I don't see why not when many lawyers were used because this apply to multiple countries), Proview is able to prove they had a verbal agreement it will still holds up in court.
    It is Apple's own fault for being so secretive, and lied to get the name. They could have said they are making an updated version of "Newton" which iPad essentially is, Apple to remove that none-competitive clause on the contract and Proview would most likely be ok with.
    Too bad when they were negotiating this deal Apple do not have billions on hand to throw around, now that Apple do have the billions and if I were Proview and able to get the name back I would only lease it to Apple instead of selling it.

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •