+ Reply
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: WSJ Reports Samsung Offering Apple Secret Deal in Australian Patent Case

is a discussion within the

iPad News

forums, a part of the

General iPad

section;
The Wall Street Journal reported today Samsung is attempting to reach a secret deal with Apple that would allow the company to sell their Galaxy 10.1 tablet in Australia. Samsung's
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Phillip Swanson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,342
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 79 Times in 46 Posts

    Default WSJ Reports Samsung Offering Apple Secret Deal in Australian Patent Case



    The Wall Street Journal reported today Samsung is attempting to reach a secret deal with Apple that would allow the company to sell their Galaxy 10.1 tablet in Australia.

    Samsung's Attorney David Catterns told Down Jones Newswires, after a Federal court hearing in Sydney today, that if Apple accepts the deal the Galaxy Tab could be on store shelves in Australia by next week. The deal will most likely see some concessions on Samsung’s part. Hopefully—for their sake—it isn’t anything like the deal Samsung, HTC, and other Android manufacturers struck with Microsoft garnering the Redmond Giant an estimated $444 million a year in revenue. Reportedly that equates to between $3 and $6 per android device sold.

    If the deal includes some sort of fee paid to Apple—which again cuts into Samsung’s bottom line—it could set a nasty precedent for their other legal battles across the globe. With Amazon releasing a sub $200 tablet, and Apple dominating the market, Samsung can’t afford to keep their devices priced so high, and forking over more money per unit sold to another company means they can’t afford to lower prices much either. Most of all though, they can't afford to not sell their devices at all and a successful Apple injunction would do just that.

    Samsung and Apple have pulled their best Carmen Sandiego legal impersonation over the last year, and while the details of the deal are “secret” any resolution would be welcome by both sides, especially Samsung. Maybe I should have gone into patent law.

    Source: The Wall Street Journal
    Last edited by Phillip Swanson; 09-30-2011 at 12:53 PM.

  2. #2
    Peanut Brain confucious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Woking
    Posts
    10,290
    Thanks
    139
    Thanked 917 Times in 832 Posts

    I hope they come to a satisfactory solution for everyone.
    He who asks a question looks foolish for 5 minutes. He who doesn't ask a question remains foolish forever.

  3. #3
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    406
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts

    I'm sorry, but if someone was dumb enough to pick up a box that says Samsung Galaxy Tab right on it and think its an iPad, they are several levels beyond stupid.

  4. #4
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by GmAz View Post
    I'm sorry, but if someone was dumb enough to pick up a box that says Samsung Galaxy Tab right on it and think its an iPad, they are several levels beyond stupid.
    I think it's more about people seeing it and "hey this looks like an iPad", maybe I'll try it out because it's cheaper(?)

    It's more the idea of Samsung trying to tag along with Apple's success, which is Apple's. And it's very clear that Samsung tried to copy that.

  5. #5
    Peanut Brain confucious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Woking
    Posts
    10,290
    Thanks
    139
    Thanked 917 Times in 832 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Raeki View Post
    it's very clear that Samsung tried to copy that.
    Is it?
    He who asks a question looks foolish for 5 minutes. He who doesn't ask a question remains foolish forever.

  6. #6
    iPhone? More like MyPhone Kil0111's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Toms River, NJ
    Posts
    140
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by confucious View Post
    Is it?
    Seriously dude? Are you not seeing the similarities being almost identical to one another? Someone copied off of someone.. And if it wasn't samsung then apple beat them to the punch. Simple as that.

    Removed for being inappropriate. This is your sixth and final warning -

  7. #7
    Peanut Brain confucious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Woking
    Posts
    10,290
    Thanks
    139
    Thanked 917 Times in 832 Posts

    You seem to have a very simplistic view of life...
    He who asks a question looks foolish for 5 minutes. He who doesn't ask a question remains foolish forever.

  8. #8
    iPhone? More like MyPhone Kil0111's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Toms River, NJ
    Posts
    140
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

    Come on man, you of all people should know how greedy apple can be in terms of ownership. Simplistic? Sure.. but i prefer idealistic, if you will.

  9. #9
    Peanut Brain confucious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Woking
    Posts
    10,290
    Thanks
    139
    Thanked 917 Times in 832 Posts

    idealistic?I guess you are young. We all are until life catches up with ys.
    Enjoy it while you can
    He who asks a question looks foolish for 5 minutes. He who doesn't ask a question remains foolish forever.

  10. #10
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    853
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 51 Times in 47 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Raeki View Post
    I think it's more about people seeing it and "hey this looks like an iPad", maybe I'll try it out because it's cheaper(?)
    same price right??

    samsung galaxy tab 10.1 16g wifi = $499
    apple ipad2 16g wifi = $499

  11. #11
    Livin the iPhone Life Poseidon79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    8,265
    Thanks
    819
    Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,159 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by confucious View Post
    Is it?
    Regardless of whether or not they tried to copy it or not... it looks similar enough to have achieved injunctions in several countries in several courts so the legal world seems to think they copied it.

  12. #12
    My iPhone is a Part of Me GrandMstrBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    804
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 27 Times in 24 Posts

    Screw Apple, yes I have the iPad 2 but as soon as the Galaxy 10.1 3G/4G comes out for T-Mobile it's time to say good bye to the iPad for good.

  13. #13
    iPhoneaholic
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    405
    Thanks
    75
    Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by GmAz View Post
    I'm sorry, but if someone was dumb enough to pick up a box that says Samsung Galaxy Tab right on it and think its an iPad, they are several levels beyond stupid.
    I agree 110%! Honestly I other than being white and having a picture of the product on the front (no way you can confuse one for the other) what makes anyone think the Galaxy tab can be confused for an iPad? Sorry but if you're that stupid you deserve to get hosed. They also show a picture of the box opened.... wow they look similar but you can't see that with a closed and sealed box. I believe Samy is getting hosed but just my opinion..... and we know what they say about those.

    Yes they did get injunctions in several countries but seems to me like the folks who brought forth those injunctions are the stupid of which I spoke.

  14. #14
    Livin the iPhone Life Poseidon79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    8,265
    Thanks
    819
    Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,159 Posts

    It's the concept of protecting intellectual property from which the company makes a profit. If you came up with a product that you had a patent on and were making millions of dollars and someone down the street came out with something virtually identical to do the same thing and as a result you lost millions or dollars worth of sales I bet my life you'd go after them just like Apple is to protect their profits.. ie shareholders investments.

  15. #15
    What's Jailbreak? Vaer0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    **** apple seriously... I'm sure they think they run the world, with their patent and lawsuit a day life style... Just because the box is white and the company puts a picture of there product on the front their copying apple? wtf, since when did apple invent this? So a brand can't put their mark and product on the box?, and most company's like to put the project in question at the top of the box so its the first thing the consumer sees... **** off apple..... just F off...

  16. #16
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Maybe iPad it's better but the galaxy tab has Flash so I will get the galaxy or Acer cause it has a USB connection

  17. #17
    Livin the iPhone Life sziklassy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Iowa (ISU for Vet School!)
    Posts
    3,920
    Thanks
    69
    Thanked 310 Times in 264 Posts

    FWIW I purchased one of the HP Touchpads when they went on "fire sale". They are packaged the same way, and look remarkably like an iPad. I am just throwing this out there, but is it possible that tablets look like the iPad because the iPad, too, is a tablet? I agree that something can easily be done about packaging, but there are so many products that use "Apple-esque" packaging. Further, is the packaging even patented, copyrighted, etc? If not, it should be completely irrelevant (and legally it very well may be).

    The thing I do not understand is how similar one product can be to another before it is considered a "copy". These two devices (including their packaging) look different enough that any reasonably sensible person would notice a difference. There are plenty of products out there where one make looks identical to another make (let's talk tvs, monitors, hell you can throw in any technology here). Why is the galaxy tab the product to go after?
    Last edited by sziklassy; 10-01-2011 at 09:44 AM.

  18. #18
    szr
    szr is offline
    iPhone? More like MyPhone szr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    294
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Poseidon79 View Post
    It's the concept of protecting intellectual property from which the company makes a profit. If you came up with a product that you had a patent on and were making millions of dollars and someone down the street came out with something virtually identical to do the same thing and as a result you lost millions or dollars worth of sales I bet my life you'd go after them just like Apple is to protect their profits.. ie shareholders investments.
    This would all be true and fair to say if Apple was the originator of the concept of a tablet device, but the fact of the matter, the concept (and patents) existed long before the iPad, as well as the Newton. This is more of a question of competition. Products that look similar to one another are all over the place. Kleenex may be a very known brand of tissue, but every other tissue and it's container are virtual identical aside from names and logos. The same goes for many kinds of products. Suing a competitor strictly on grounds of product similarity is just plain silly.

    Has not the idea of compitition always been about building the better proverbial mouse trap, not suing the one who does? I could understand if Samsung had used actual iPad parts or actually stole part of their OS, but I always recall it being totally fair game if one came up with a product on their own, like how Atari lost in suing Coleco for making an Atari 2600 module for their console because they used off the shelf parts instead of using Atari's proprietary ones. As far as I've read, Samsung has not used any proprietary hardware or software owned by Apple, so I fail to really see what grounds Apple truly has in these law suits.
    Last edited by szr; 10-04-2011 at 06:25 PM.

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts