+ Reply
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Your favorite Apple, iPhone, iPad, iOS, Jailbreak, and Cydia site.


Thread: Samsung Cites 2001: A Space Odyssey as Prior Art in Patent Suit

is a discussion within the

iPad News

forums, a part of the

General iPad

section;
Today Florian Mueller, writer for FOSS Patens blog, noticed a rather peculiar argument as part of Samsung's defense in their patent suit with Apple. Samsung is claiming 2001: A Space
...
  1. #1
    MMi Staff Writer Phillip Swanson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,342
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 79 Times in 46 Posts

    Default Samsung Cites 2001: A Space Odyssey as Prior Art in Patent Suit



    Today Florian Mueller, writer for FOSS Patens blog, noticed a rather peculiar argument as part of Samsung's defense in their patent suit with Apple.

    Samsung is claiming 2001: A Space Odyssey established iPad like devices as prior art, as part of their defense. The argument is odd, and most definitely not an integral part of Samsungs defense, I hope.

    As with the design claimed by the D’889 Patent, the tablet disclosed in the clip has an overall rectangular shape with a dominant display screen, narrow borders, a predominately flat front surface, a flat back surface (which is evident because the tablets are lying flat on the table's surface), and a thin form factor. - Samung's legal team.
    The scene in questions shows two astronaunts eating at a long table with two devices on the table next to their food. The devices appear to be video screens, with dimensions similar to tablet devices. However, the astronauts are never seen interacting with the devices at all, giving very little credence to Samsung's claims that the devices pictured are even tablets.

    I will give Samsung's legal team props for citing one of my favorite movies in their argument, but having reference scores any points with the courts is highly unlikely.

    Source: FOSS Patents
    Last edited by Phillip Swanson; 08-23-2011 at 07:23 PM.

  2. #2
    iPhone? More like MyPhone sammo123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 36 Times in 9 Posts

    Stupid Samsung trying to low ball Apple with this nonsense...pathetic

  3. #3
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by sammo123 View Post
    Stupid Samsung trying to low ball Apple with this nonsense...pathetic
    Funny how they think it'll work isn't it?

  4. #4
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    236
    Thanks
    227
    Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts

    Excellent move! The courts should slap apple for this nonsense of trademarking/patenting/copyrighting the rectangle... Sheesh!

  5. #5
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    216
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by cpotoso View Post
    Excellent move! The courts should slap apple for this nonsense of trademarking/patenting/copyrighting the rectangle... Sheesh!
    Honestly, this isn't going to get them anywhere in the case. It's not relevant to the case, and will just make them look like there scraping the barrel.
    Username is 3GS, but theres stuff past that:

    iPhone 4
    iPad
    Macbook Pro

  6. #6
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Its amazing to see that Apple actually think they invented the tablet/pad...

    The whole idea if a "pad-like" device have been used in so many moves, eg. star trek... on this one, i think Apple is pathetic.. get real damnit.. you dident invent it just because you created one...

  7. #7
    Green Apple
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    60
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts

    I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't allow that defense. LOL

  8. #8
    iPhoneaholic manickbarry's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    305
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 38 Times in 19 Posts

    I would have thought star trek would have been a better choice

  9. #9
    My iPhone is a Part of Me
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    860
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 51 Times in 47 Posts

    pic from star trek ~ 1966

    i think apple copied it


  10. #10
    My iPhone is a Part of Me keenpois0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    573
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by daytonaviolet View Post
    pic from star trek ~ 1966

    i think apple copied it

    can definitely see the resemblance

  11. #11
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by sammo123 View Post
    Stupid Samsung trying to low ball Apple with this nonsense...pathetic
    But it's brilliant when apple sues samsung with the same kind of nonsense?

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to aemon For This Useful Post:

    cpotoso (08-24-2011)

  13. #12
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    268
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by sammo123 View Post
    Stupid Samsung trying to low ball Apple with this nonsense...pathetic
    If it was the other way round you wouldn't be saying that, Apple may have nicked the iPad design from one OS Samsung's picture frames, that was made in 2006.

    Apple are Control freaks we need to stop them before they take over the world!!

  14. #13
    Green Apple Du Blex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    54
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    So they're basically saying they'd rather be sued by MGM Studios instead?...

  15. #14
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,110
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 94 Times in 66 Posts

    Whether it's relevant to the case or not is IRRELEVANT....the burden of proof rests with Apple. They have to prove that Samsung copied their design......Samsung does not have to prove that they didn't...although any evidence they submit would most likely help them.

    So the peculiarity of this really doesn't matter because it's certainly better than FORGING evidence.....which is what APPLE did. So try to remember that before you think something is ridiculous.
    Last edited by RICO_; 08-24-2011 at 06:33 AM.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to RICO_ For This Useful Post:

    cpotoso (08-24-2011)

  17. #15
    Green Apple Cheesey123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    95
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...YEARS-OLD.html

    Another example of a tablet well before the iPad

  18. #16
    What's Jailbreak?
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Danbury, Connecticut, United States
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by valkin View Post
    Its amazing to see that Apple actually think they invented the tablet/pad...

    The whole idea if a "pad-like" device have been used in so many moves, eg. star trek... on this one, i think Apple is pathetic.. get real damnit.. you dident invent it just because you created one...
    Sorry, but I think it is a whole different think between "think in something" and "make that thing"
    the ipad is not just an ordinary thing, it is nothing without the iOS which was made by apple, which I think is the most important thing in the tablet in my opinion
    Last edited by fmbar00; 08-24-2011 at 08:50 AM.

  19. #17
    iPhone? More like MyPhone
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    236
    Thanks
    227
    Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by iphone?3gs View Post
    Honestly, this isn't going to get them anywhere in the case. It's not relevant to the case, and will just make them look like there scraping the barrel.
    Then tell me again... what are the motives that apple is suing Samsung? It is the look of the device. This proves the nonsense of that. As stated by others, apple has to prove their cases, not vice-versa. They will loose this one.

  20. #18
    What's Jailbreak? dz302's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by cpotoso View Post
    Excellent move! The courts should slap apple for this nonsense of trademarking/patenting/copyrighting the rectangle... Sheesh!
    I think they are referencing whats inside the rectangle. Im waiting for someone else to create and produce something with the
    impact lame apple has done. i truly think that if someone builds a better product the migration to that product will follow.

    dz
    Last edited by dz302; 08-24-2011 at 10:58 AM.

  21. #19
    Livin the iPhone Life
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,128
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts

    The patent Apple said Samsung infringed on is the look of the device.
    All Samsung have to prove is a device as a drawing or actual product that have similar looks would not only win the lawsuit, it would also throw Apple's patent out the window. It does not matter how rediculous it may be or the owner of previous device did not patent their concept, Samsung or any other companies can use it.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to unison999 For This Useful Post:

    cpotoso (08-24-2011)

  23. #20
    chi-town fanatic! Paco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    1,429
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts

    If a company wants to make a tablet I think they hav to make it a different shape like a circle to avoid any lawsuits from apple

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts