• Your favorite

    Apple

    ,

    iPhone

    ,

    iPad

    ,

    iOS

    ,
    Jailbreak
    , and
    Cydia
    site.
  • Apple To Move Away From Samsung For Production of A6 Chips In 2012



    The ongoing legal battle between Samsung and Apple appears to be showing signs of wear on the two companies business relationship. According to Ars Technica, Apple is likely to tap Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company to build its next-generation "A6" chip in place of Samsung.

    The current "A5" chip found in the iPad 2 and likely the next iPhone is built by Samsung using a 45nm process.

    "It seems likely that Apple is making the change to cut some, if not all, Samsung-made components out of its supply chain," the report said.

    If Samsung loses Apple's business it would leave nearly an $8 billion hole in their bottom line (Apple is expected to buy $7.8 in Samsung components this year). The next generation "A6" chips which are rumored to be based on a 28nm process, would be a huge pick up for TSMC. The rumors of Apple courting the Taiwanese company for chip production date back to March, and the patent disputes between Apple and Samsung appear to have sped up the process, or at least the speculation.

    While Samsung has a number of phones, and tablets they manufacture themselves, they don't generate the production volume Apple demands. Also, with rumors of an ARM-based MacBook Air lingering, the potential for more orders from Apple would seem like an enticing prospect.

    Source: Ars Technica
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Apple To Move Away From Samsung For Production of A6 Chips In 2012 started by Phillip Swanson View original post
    Comments 9 Comments
    1. exNavy's Avatar
      exNavy -
      Yuo righters shuld bee fourced two yse spel chek.
    1. confucious's Avatar
      confucious -
      Unless Samsung have no costs, losing $7.8M of sales will not result in a bottom line deficit of nearly $8M.....
    1. ihappy's Avatar
      ihappy -
      This will definitely be a huge blow for Samsung since Apple is a huge client.
    1. PatrickGSR94's Avatar
      PatrickGSR94 -
      Quote Originally Posted by confucious View Post
      Unless Samsung have no costs, losing $7.8M of sales will not result in a bottom line deficit of nearly $8M.....
      that's >>B<
    1. feidhlim1986's Avatar
      feidhlim1986 -
      Samsung make high quality components. I hope Apple isn't thinking of changing to a potentially lower quality supplier just to spite Samsung.
    1. confucious's Avatar
      confucious -
      Quote Originally Posted by PatrickGSR94 View Post
      that's >>B<
      Billion / Million Meh
      It's just money
    1. coolguy742's Avatar
      coolguy742 -
      Quote Originally Posted by exNavy View Post
      Yuo righters shuld bee fourced two yse spel chek.
      eet's 2011, spealchck iz obselate,
    1. Orby's Avatar
      Orby -
      Quote Originally Posted by exNavy View Post
      Yuo righters shuld bee fourced two yse spel chek.
      Quote Originally Posted by coolguy742 View Post
      eet's 2011, spealchck iz obselate,
      Spel chek: you get it close, we get it right.

      Quote Originally Posted by confucious View Post
      Billion / Million Meh
      It's just money
      Ah yes, just money. Rounding error of a rounding error.

      (Can we make it a rule that all "rounding errors of rounding errors" go to my offshore account? Just have to hit it once and I'm set for life!).

      OT: I wonder how this will affect Apple in terms of system-on-a-chip design. Apple has been reliant on Samsung both for microprocessor design (all the processors to date are based off of various Samsung Hummingbird SoC designs if I'm not mistaken) and wafer fabrication. I wonder if this move will propel (either intentionally or as an unintended consequence) Apple to a full-blown "fabless" designer like Infineon, NVIDIA, VIA, or Qualcomm.