• Your favorite

    Apple

    ,

    iPhone

    ,

    iPad

    ,

    iOS

    ,
    Jailbreak
    , and
    Cydia
    site.
  • Latest MacBook Pros 13-53% Faster According to Latest Benchmarks


    MacWorld has released new benchmark results for the latest generation of MacBook Pros. They feature Intelís newest Core i5 and Core i7 processors better known by their code name Sandy Bridge and the results are impressive. Macworld ran their usual battery of speed tests on the latest MacBook Pros. The only exception to the testing was with the new Thunderbolt connection, as devices that use this new standard were not yet available in time for testing.

    The latest MacBook Pros include Intelís newest Core i processors. These chips integrate many features that were once only found on separate chips. The processor, cache, graphics, and memory controller are all included on the same chip, which allows the processor to run more efficiently, increasing overall performance.

    The graphics processors used in the latest MacBook Pros have also been upgraded because of the Sandy Bridge processors. All of the latest MacBook Pros now uses the Intel HD Graphics 3000 processor that uses 384 MB of RAM that is shared with the main memory. The 15 and 17-inch models also include graphic processors by AMD instead of NVIDIA, this time around.

    The 13-inch entry-level MacBook Pro received a score of 141 on the Speedmark 6.5 test. This translates to a 35% increase in overall performance. This model showed marked improvements in every category tested with the exception of the Call of Duty tests. It was only able to display 26 fps as opposed to last yearís model which was able to product 33 fps. Using Intelís integrated graphics processor instead of a dedicated graphics card, really brought performance down quite a bit. The upper level 13-inch MacBook Pro only saw a 13% improvement over last yearís model, even though it uses the fastest dual-core processor that Intel currently makes, the 2.7 GHz Core i7 processor.



    The 15-inch MacBook Pro using a 2.0 GHz Core i7 quad-core processor, saw a 33% increase in speed over last yearís model. The next model 15-inch MacBook Pro using a 2.2 GHz Core i7 quad-core processor, saw a 38% increase over last yearís model. Itís not surprising that both computers scored so closely during the tests, as the clock speed of both CPUís is quite close to one another.

    The 17-inch MacBook Pro saw the greatest benefit from the upgrade to the Sandy Bridge processors with a 53% increase over last years model. This model has very similar specifications to the higher-end 15-inch model. This dramatic increase in system performance may have to do with the AMDís Radeon HD 6750M graphics processor that includes 1GB of dedicated video memory.

    Although the latest MacBook Proís didnít include a new case design, which was widely expected, the speed improvements over last yearís models canít be ignored. Using the latest Intel Sandy Bridge processors, the 2011 MacBook Pros are the fastest portable Macs that Apple has ever produced. I canít wait to take one for a test drive.

    Source: MacWorld
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Latest MacBook Pros 13-53% Faster According to Latest Benchmarks started by Wiley John Wright View original post
    Comments 71 Comments
    1. keenpois0n's Avatar
      keenpois0n -
      I want me one of those MacBooks.
    1. delusion950's Avatar
      delusion950 -
      Little late with news. This was up yesterday.
    1. iSteed's Avatar
      iSteed -
      I'm definitely happy with my base 13 inch.
    1. mhtruth's Avatar
      mhtruth -
      These results aren't Awe inspiring... especially from the quad-cores... plus im still pissed about Apple not adding usb 3.0 to its hardware... that would have been too easy and hardware is too readily available. Nope, lets take light-peak rename after a yet to be released android phone, and make them wait for hardware that supports this feature... GO APPLE!!!...too hell!
    1. Tenspeed123's Avatar
      Tenspeed123 -
      Quote Originally Posted by delusion950 View Post
      Little late with news. This was up yesterday.
      Was that remotely necessary, required, or relevant? Not really.
    1. 2Jaze's Avatar
      2Jaze -
      Can anyone tells me what makes the 15" model a "higher end" than the 17"?
    1. TheJailbreakGenius's Avatar
      TheJailbreakGenius -
      What time do u wake up?
    1. TheJailbreakGenius's Avatar
      TheJailbreakGenius -
      Quote Originally Posted by mhtruth View Post
      These results aren't Awe inspiring... especially from the quad-cores... plus im still pissed about Apple not adding usb 3.0 to its hardware... that would have been too easy and hardware is too readily available. Nope, lets take light-peak rename after a yet to be released android phone, and make them wait for hardware that supports this feature... GO APPLE!!!...too hell!
      Shutup and go to a different website, pessimist. Would u rather have a pc?
    1. mhtruth's Avatar
      mhtruth -
      wow! I didn't know my opinion effected you so negatively. I'll make sure to consider your feeling next time i decide to post on how Apple failed my expectations to upgrade my macbook pro. LOL! And since you were so nice as to inquire about my computer preference...bootcamp will just have to do for now. LOL!
    1. StellarZ's Avatar
      StellarZ -
      Quote Originally Posted by mhtruth View Post
      These results aren't Awe inspiring... especially from the quad-cores... plus im still pissed about Apple not adding usb 3.0 to its hardware... that would have been too easy and hardware is too readily available. Nope, lets take light-peak rename after a yet to be released android phone, and make them wait for hardware that supports this feature... GO APPLE!!!...too hell!
      I though Intel named the technology.
    1. maddawg05's Avatar
      maddawg05 -
      Got my eyes on 13" entry level especially if it's got a higher improvement rate than the upper level. Can't wait!!
    1. mhtruth's Avatar
      mhtruth -
      Apple renamed it "Thunderbolt"
    1. hitman10's Avatar
      hitman10 -
      I got the 2.3 Ghz 15" w/ high-res anti glare screen the day it came out.. Soooo nice!!! but where do i buy compatible thunderbolt hard drives?
    1. Cowboy's Avatar
      Cowboy -
      Play nice guys
    1. luketinsley's Avatar
      luketinsley -
      Quote Originally Posted by mhtruth View Post
      These results aren't Awe inspiring... especially from the quad-cores... plus im still pissed about Apple not adding usb 3.0 to its hardware... that would have been too easy and hardware is too readily available. Nope, lets take light-peak rename after a yet to be released android phone, and make them wait for hardware that supports this feature... GO APPLE!!!...too hell!
      There are many third parties out there that offer single connectors to thunderbolt for all your peripherals. Also Apples goal was to create a performance increase in their new models, adding USB 3 would not have given it that increase. So stop complaining and do your research before you post ignorant rants on forums.
    1. manickbarry's Avatar
      manickbarry -
      USB has been stale for far too long Thunderbolt has great potential IMO. I wonder if they will put a quad core in a mac mini soon?
    1. Nielsenius's Avatar
      Nielsenius -
      Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather have the one to two hours of extra battery life than a ~30% increase in processor power. My MacBook Pro has a 2.8GHz i7 and there is nothing slow about it. Unless you're doing intense gaming or lots of video editing, I'm not sure what the real benefit is.
    1. nkapoor124's Avatar
      nkapoor124 -
      Quote Originally Posted by Nielsenius View Post
      Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather have the one to two hours of extra battery life than a ~30% increase in processor power. My MacBook Pro has a 2.8GHz i7 and there is nothing slow about it. Unless you're doing intense gaming or lots of video editing, I'm not sure what the real benefit is.
      Agreed
    1. dale2's Avatar
      dale2 -
      Quote Originally Posted by Nielsenius View Post
      Maybe it's just me, but I'd rather have the one to two hours of extra battery life than a ~30% increase in processor power. My MacBook Pro has a 2.8GHz i7 and there is nothing slow about it. Unless you're doing intense gaming or lots of video editing, I'm not sure what the real benefit is.
      since the macbook pro is a portable workstation, it makes sense for performance to be a priority.
      a 30% increase in speed would save you time and more efficiently use your battery life anyway
    1. awesomeSlayer's Avatar
      awesomeSlayer -
      Dang! This MBP is a life saver!